Literature DB >> 18266654

Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.

Rafael Ratto de Moraes1, José Laurindo Machado Marimon, Luis Felipe Schneider, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Márcia Bueno.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed the effect of 6 months of aging in water on surface roughness and surface/subsurface hardness of two microhybrid resin composites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Filtek Z250 and Charisma were tested. Cylindrical specimens were obtained and stored in distilled water for 24 hours or 6 months, at 37 degrees C. For Knoop hardness evaluation, the specimens were transversely wet-flattened, and indentations were made on surface and subsurface layers. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha < or = 0.05). Surface roughness baseline measurements were made at 24 hours and repeated after 6 months of storage. Data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha < or = 0.05).
RESULTS: Surface hardness (KHN, kg/mm(2)) means (+/- standard deviation) ranged from 55 +/- 1 to 49 +/- 4 for Z250 and from 50 +/- 2 to 41 +/- 3 for Charisma, at 24 hours and 6 months, respectively. Subsurface means ranged from 58 +/- 2 to 61 +/- 3 for Z250 and from 50 +/- 1 to 54 +/- 2 for Charisma, at 24 hours and 6 months. For both composites, the aged specimens presented significantly softer surfaces (p < 0.01). For the subsurface hardness, alteration after storage was detected only for Charisma, which presented a significant rise in hardness (p < 0.01). Z250 presented significantly harder surface and subsurface layers in comparison with Charisma. Surface roughness (Ra, mum) means ranged from 0.07 +/- 0.00 to 0.07 +/- 0.01 for Z250 and from 0.06 +/- 0.01 to 0.07 +/- 0.01 for Charisma, at 24 hours and 6 months, respectively. For both composites, no significant roughness alteration was detected during the study (p= 0.386).
CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month period of storage in water presented a significant softening effect on the surfaces of the composites, although no significant deleterious alteration was detected for the subsurface hardness. In addition, the storage period had no significant effect on the surface roughness of the materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18266654     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00295.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  10 in total

1.  Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study.

Authors:  Sevil Gurgan; Uzay Koc Vural; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Filiz Yalcin Cakir
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of organic acids in dental biofilm on microhardness of a silorane-based composite.

Authors:  Sedighe Sadat Hashemikamangar; Seyed Jalal Pourhashemi; Mohammad Talebi; Nazanin Kiomarsi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-06-02

3.  The effect of microwave/laboratory light source postcuring technique and wet-aging on microhardness of composite resin.

Authors:  Farahnaz Sharafeddin; Elham Sharifi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-05

4.  Effect of protective coating on microhardness of a new glass ionomer cement: Nanofilled coating versus unfilled resin.

Authors:  Foad Faraji; Haleh Heshmat; Sepideh Banava
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

5.  Microhardness of different esthetic restorative materials: Evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink.

Authors:  Claudio Poggio; Matteo Viola; Maria Mirando; Marco Chiesa; Riccardo Beltrami; Marco Colombo
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 May-Jun

6.  Properties of A Model Self-Healing Microcapsule-Based Dental Composite Reinforced with Silica Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Khaled Abid Althaqafi; Abdulrahman Alshabib; Julian Satterthwaite; Nikolaos Silikas
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill, Conventional, and Flowable Resin Composites Stored Dry and Wet.

Authors:  Dana Jafarpour; Reihaneh Ferooz; Maryam Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-10

8.  Acid Resistance of CAD/CAM Resin Composites.

Authors:  Leonie Schmohl; Anuschka Josephine Roesner; Florian Fuchs; Maximilian Wagner; Michael Benno Schmidt; Sebastian Hahnel; Angelika Rauch; Andreas Koenig
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-11

9.  Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period.

Authors:  Ugur Erdemir; Esra Yildiz; Meltem Mert Eren; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  The Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Base Coating on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Resin Composites.

Authors:  Negar Moghaddasi; Maryam Tavallali; Dana Jafarpour; Reihaneh Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-10-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.