Literature DB >> 18266586

3-D telestration: a teaching tool for robotic surgery.

Mohamed R Ali1, Jamie P Loggins, William D Fuller, Brian E Miller, Christopher J Hasser, Peter Yellowlees, Tamas J Vidovszky, Jason J Rasmussen, Jonathan Pierce.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task.
RESULTS: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18266586     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2007.0051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Improving Common Ground Development in Surgical Training through Talk and Action.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Feng; Helena M Mentis
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  General surgery training in the era of robotic surgery: a qualitative analysis of perceptions from resident and attending surgeons.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Jenny Lam; Hannah M Hollandsworth; Arielle M Lee; Nicole E Lopez; Benjamin Abbadessa; Samuel Eisenstein; Bard C Cosman; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Lisa A Parry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An evaluation framework for defining the contributions of telestration in surgical telementoring.

Authors:  Andrius Budrionis; Knut Magne Augestad; Hiten Rh Patel; Johan Gustav Bellika
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 4.  Telepointer technology in telemedicine: a review.

Authors:  Rohana Abdul Karim; Nor Farizan Zakaria; Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley; Mohd Marzuki Mustafa; Ismail Sagap; Nani Harlina Md Latar
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings.

Authors:  Julia Schreyer; Amelie Koch; Annika Herlemann; Armin Becker; Boris Schlenker; Ken Catchpole; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.