Literature DB >> 18266039

Screening for recurrences in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery: is there a role for MRI?

John W Gorechlad1, Elizabeth B McCabe, John H Higgins, Donald S Likosky, Petra J Lewis, Kari M Rosenkranz, Richard J Barth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it has been shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography in the detection of breast cancer in high-risk populations, there is little data on the use of MRI as a screening tool to detect recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Our objective was to determine the potential role of MRI in the screening of breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing margin-negative lumpectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy for infiltrating breast carcinoma between 1(st) January 1993 and 1(st) January 2004. Patients were followed for recurrence in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast by physical exam and mammography.
RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-six primary tumor excisions were performed. Patients were followed for a median of 5.4 years. Ipsilateral breast recurrences developed in eight patients (1.7%) with a mean diameter of 1.6 cm. All of these women are alive and free of metastases. Contralateral cancers developed in 11 patients (2.3%) with a mean diameter of 1.5 cm. Ten of these 11 women are alive and free of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary patient population the risk of local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy is very low. If screening MRI had been a part of annual follow-up, a total of 2570 MRIs would have been performed. Given the small tumor size at detection and the excellent survival of those who recurred, annual screening MRI would have incurred significant cost and would have been unlikely to improve overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18266039     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-9832-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  Should screening MRI be included in surveillance for patients treated with breast-conserving therapy?

Authors:  Murray Rebner; Inga Grills; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-11-25

2.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging: are those who need it getting it?

Authors:  S Tan; J David; L Lalonde; M El Khoury; M Labelle; R Younan; E Patocskai; J Richard; I Trop
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Early uptake of breast magnetic resonance imaging in a community-based medical practice, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.

Authors:  D Ribnikar; J M Ribeiro; D Pinto; B Sousa; A C Pinto; E Gomes; E C Moser; M J Cardoso; F Cardoso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

5.  Use of Breast Imaging After Treatment for Locoregional Breast Cancer (AFT-01).

Authors:  Taiwo Adesoye; Jessica R Schumacher; Heather B Neuman; Stephen Edge; Daniel McKellar; David P Winchester; Amanda B Francescatti; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Mammographycally occult high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as second primary breast cancer, detected with MRI: a case report.

Authors:  Marta Zebic-Sinkovec; Maksimiljan Kadivec; Gasper Podobnik; Erik Skof; Marko Snoj
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.991

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.