Literature DB >> 18265841

The visual light field.

Jan J Koenderink1, Sylvia C Pont, Andrea J van Doorn, Astrid M L Kappers, James T Todd.   

Abstract

Human observers are sensitive to the '(physical) light field' in the sense that they have expectations of how a given object would appear if it were introduced in the scene in front of them at some arbitrary location. Thus the 'visual light field' is defined even in the 'empty space' between objects. In that sense the light field is akin to visual space considered as a 'container'. The visual light field at any given point can be measured in psychophysical experiments through the introduction of a suitable 'gauge object' at that position and letting the observer adjust the appearance of that gauge object (eg through suitable computer rendering) so as to produce a 'visual fit' into the scene. The parameters of the rendering will then be considered as the measurement result. We introduced white spheres as gauge objects at various locations in stereoscopically presented photographic scenes. We measured the direction ('direction of the light'), diffuseness ('quality of the light' as used by photographers and interior decorators), and intensity of the light field. We used three very different scenes, with very different physical light fields. The images were geometrically and photometrically calibrated, so we were in a position to correlate the observations with the physical 'ground truth'. We report that human observers are quite sensitive to various parameters of the physical light field and generally arrive at close to veridical settings, although a number of comparatively minor systematic deviations from veridicality can be noted. We conclude that the visual light field is an entity whose existence is at least as well defined as that of visual space, despite the fact that the visual light field hardly appears as prominently in vision science as it does in the visual arts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265841     DOI: 10.1068/p5672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  The influence of shape cues on the perception of lighting direction.

Authors:  James P O'Shea; Maneesh Agrawala; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  We infer light in space.

Authors:  James A Schirillo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

3.  The color constancy of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  Bei Xiao; Brendan Hurst; Lauren MacIntyre; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Detection of changes in luminance distributions.

Authors:  Thomas Y Lee; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Awareness of the light field: the case of deformation.

Authors:  Andrea J van Doorn; Jan J Koenderink; James T Todd; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-07-18

6.  Is the perception of 3D shape from shading based on assumed reflectance and illumination?

Authors:  James T Todd; Eric J L Egan; Flip Phillips
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  The visual light field in real scenes.

Authors:  Ling Xia; Sylvia C Pont; Ingrid Heynderickx
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  Increasing the Complexity of the Illumination May Reduce Gloss Constancy.

Authors:  Gunnar Wendt; Franz Faul
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-12-09

9.  Estimating the Illumination Direction From Three-Dimensional Texture of Brownian Surfaces.

Authors:  Sylvia C Pont; Andrea J van Doorn; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-04-13

10.  Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene.

Authors:  Ling Xia; Sylvia C Pont; Ingrid Heynderick
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.