Literature DB >> 1826526

A study of inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pocket depth and attachment level.

J L Fleiss1, J Mann, M Paik, J Goultchin, N W Chilton.   

Abstract

Factors affecting inter- and intra-examiner variability for probing pocket depth and periodontal attachment level were studied on a sample of 20 patients, each given six full-month examinations, two by each of 3 examiners. The major determinant of both dimensions of variability was the degree of periodontal destruction, measured as either pocket depth or level of attachment: the greater the degree of destruction, the greater the disagreements within and between examiners. Differences in variability were generally minor between sites on anterior and sites on posterior teeth, between midsites and proximal sites, and between sites on the facial and sites on the lingual surface. When differences were found between the average variances for different kinds of sites, they may have been due to corresponding differences between the average depths, and not to any inherently greater difficulty in measuring one kind of site than another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1826526     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1991.tb01635.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  3 in total

1.  A SEMI-PARAMETRIC BAYESIAN MODEL OF INTER- AND INTRA-EXAMINER AGREEMENT FOR PERIODONTAL PROBING DEPTH.

Authors:  E G Hill; E H Slate
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Birte Holtfreter; Dietrich Alte; Christian Schwahn; Moïse Desvarieux; Thomas Kocher
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 8.728

3.  Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe.

Authors:  R Deepa; Shobha Prakash
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.