Literature DB >> 18264725

ER alpha negative breast cancer cells restore response to endocrine therapy by combination treatment with both HDAC inhibitor and DNMT inhibitor.

Jiang Fan1, Wen-Jin Yin, Jin-Song Lu, Lei Wang, Jiong Wu, Feng-Ying Wu, Gen-Hong Di, Zhen-Zhou Shen, Zhi-Min Shao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) mediates the growth stimulation of estrogen in breast cancer cells and is a useful predictive factor for response to endocrine therapy. It is reported that ER alpha was induced in ER alpha negative breast cancer cells by both DNA methyltransferase-1 (DNMT1) inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AZA) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA). However, whether the breast cancer cells with induced ER alpha restore response to endocrine therapy requires to be further researched. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method was used to explore the change in the mRNA of ER alpha, PR and pS2 in the ER alpha negative breast cancer cells MDA-MB-435 treated with two chemicals (AZA + TSA). Water-soluble tetrazolium salt-8 (WST-8) method was used to study the proliferation rate of the breast cancer cells. Flow cytometer (FCW) was used to analyze the distribution of cell cycle of these breast cancer cells. Some xenograft models in nude mice were used to further study the results we found in vitro.
RESULTS: In this study we observed that the mRNA of ER alpha, PR and pS2 in the ER alpha negative breast cancer cells MDA-MB-435 was re-expressed by treatment with AZA + TSA. The proliferation assay analysis showed AZA + TSA suppressed the proliferation of MDA-MB-435 cells, which were further suppressed by addition of 4-OH Tamoxifen (4-OHT). On the contrary, the proliferation of cells treated with 4-OHT alone showed no difference compared with the vehicle control. Cell cycle analysis showed AZA + TSA treated cells showed S phase arrest, which was partially attenuated by addition of estradiol (E2); furthermore, the effect of E2 on stimulation of cell cycle could be reversed by 4-OHT in the treated cells with induced ER alpha. In vivo experiment xenograft volume of MDA-MB-435 cells treated with AZA + TSA was smaller than that of the control (P < 0.01), and the xenograft of AZA + TSA treated cells was further suppressed by ovariectomy (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that DNMT1 inhibitor AZA and HDAC inhibitor TSA play important roles in restoring sensitivity of the ER alpha negative breast cancer cells to endocrine therapy in vitro and in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264725     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-008-0354-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  25 in total

Review 1.  Acetylation and chromosomal functions.

Authors:  W L Cheung; S D Briggs; C D Allis
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  Transcriptional activation of estrogen receptor alpha in human breast cancer cells by histone deacetylase inhibition.

Authors:  X Yang; A T Ferguson; S J Nass; D L Phillips; K A Butash; S M Wang; J G Herman; N E Davidson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid induces differentiation of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  P N Munster; T Troso-Sandoval; N Rosen; R Rifkind; P A Marks; V M Richon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Jones; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Epigenetic information and estrogen receptor alpha expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Giacinti; Pier Paolo Claudio; Massimo Lopez; Antonio Giordano
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-01

6.  Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, suppresses the growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  L M Butler; D B Agus; H I Scher; B Higgins; A Rose; C Cordon-Cardo; H T Thaler; R A Rifkind; P A Marks; V M Richon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Methyl-group dietary intake and risk of breast cancer among African-American women: a case-control study by methylation status of the estrogen receptor alpha genes.

Authors:  Kangmin Zhu; Nancy E Davidson; Sandra Hunter; Xiaowei Yang; Kathleen Payne-Wilks; Chanel L Roland; Dawn Phillips; Christy Bentley; Min Dai; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A sensitizes estrogen receptor alpha-negative breast cancer cells to tamoxifen.

Authors:  Eun Ryoung Jang; Soo-Jeong Lim; Eun Sook Lee; Gajin Jeong; Tae-You Kim; Yung-Jue Bang; Jong-Soo Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Number of CpG islands and genes in human and mouse.

Authors:  F Antequera; A Bird
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Altered methylation patterns in cancer cell genomes: cause or consequence?

Authors:  Stephen Baylin; Timothy H Bestor
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 31.743

View more
  50 in total

1.  Progestin and antiprogestin responsiveness in breast cancer is driven by the PRA/PRB ratio via AIB1 or SMRT recruitment to the CCND1 and MYC promoters.

Authors:  Victoria Wargon; Marina Riggio; Sebastián Giulianelli; Gonzalo R Sequeira; Paola Rojas; María May; María L Polo; María A Gorostiaga; Britta Jacobsen; Alfredo Molinolo; Virginia Novaro; Claudia Lanari
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer: current status, possible mechanisms and overcoming strategies.

Authors:  Weimin Fan; Jinjia Chang; Peifeng Fu
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.808

3.  Epigenetic Reactivation of Estrogen Receptor: Promising Tools for Restoring Response to Endocrine Therapy.

Authors:  Neeraj K Saxena; Dipali Sharma
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2010

4.  A chimeric SERM-histone deacetylase inhibitor approach to breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Hitisha K Patel; Marton I Siklos; Hazem Abdelkarim; Emma L Mendonca; Aditya Vaidya; Pavel A Petukhov; Gregory R J Thatcher
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Entinostat: a promising treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Michelle A Rudek; Richard Piekarz
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Targeting tumorigenicity of breast cancer stem-like cells using combination epigenetic therapy: something old and something new.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  SIRT1 deacetylates the DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein and alters its activities.

Authors:  Lirong Peng; Zhigang Yuan; Hongbo Ling; Kenji Fukasawa; Keith Robertson; Nancy Olashaw; John Koomen; Jiandong Chen; William S Lane; Edward Seto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Dual Src Kinase/Pretubulin Inhibitor KX-01, Sensitizes ERα-negative Breast Cancers to Tamoxifen through ERα Reexpression.

Authors:  Muralidharan Anbalagan; Mei Sheng; Brian Fleischer; Yifang Zhang; Yuanjun Gao; Van Hoang; Margarite Matossian; Hope E Burks; Matthew E Burow; Bridgette M Collins-Burow; David Hangauer; Brian G Rowan
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 9.  Rational therapeutic combinations with histone deacetylase inhibitors for the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  K Ted Thurn; Scott Thomas; Amy Moore; Pamela N Munster
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 10.  Mechanisms of resistance to estrogen receptor modulators in ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Qianying Wang; Qing Wang; Jiangran Cao; Jiafu Sun; Zhengmao Zhu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.