BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In South Africa diabetes makes a significant contribution to the burden of disease. Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of adult blindness, and screening can reduce the incidence. This project aimed to implement and evaluate a new service for retinal screening that uses a non-mydriatic mobile fundal camera in primary care. This is the first time such a service has been evaluated in an African primary care context. METHODS: The service was implemented as an operational research study at three community health centres and data were collected to evaluate the operational issues, screening, reporting and referral of patients. RESULTS: Out of 400 patients screened 84% had a significantly reduced visual acuity, 63% had retinopathy (22% severe nonproliferative, 6% proliferative and 15% maculopathy), 2% of eyes could not be screened and 14% of patients required dilatation. Referral was necessary in 27% of cases for cataracts, in 7% for laser treatment and in 4% for other specialist services. Repeat photography was needed in 8% and urgent follow-up in 12%. A SWOT analysis of the pilot project was completed and recommendations were made on how to integrate it into the district health system. CONCLUSION: Screening with a fundal camera improved the quality of care for diabetic patients and is feasible in the South African public sector, primary care setting. A single technician should be able to photograph almost 10,000 patients a year.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In South Africa diabetes makes a significant contribution to the burden of disease. Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of adult blindness, and screening can reduce the incidence. This project aimed to implement and evaluate a new service for retinal screening that uses a non-mydriatic mobile fundal camera in primary care. This is the first time such a service has been evaluated in an African primary care context. METHODS: The service was implemented as an operational research study at three community health centres and data were collected to evaluate the operational issues, screening, reporting and referral of patients. RESULTS: Out of 400 patients screened 84% had a significantly reduced visual acuity, 63% had retinopathy (22% severe nonproliferative, 6% proliferative and 15% maculopathy), 2% of eyes could not be screened and 14% of patients required dilatation. Referral was necessary in 27% of cases for cataracts, in 7% for laser treatment and in 4% for other specialist services. Repeat photography was needed in 8% and urgent follow-up in 12%. A SWOT analysis of the pilot project was completed and recommendations were made on how to integrate it into the district health system. CONCLUSION: Screening with a fundal camera improved the quality of care for diabeticpatients and is feasible in the South African public sector, primary care setting. A single technician should be able to photograph almost 10,000 patients a year.
Authors: Danielle B Cohen; Theresa J Allain; Simon Glover; Daniel Chimbayo; Helen Dzamalala; Helma W C Hofland; Ndaziona P K Banda; Eduard E Zijlstra Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Rènée du Toit; Hannah B Faal; Daniel Etya'ale; Boateng Wiafe; Ingrid Mason; Ronnie Graham; Simon Bush; Wanjiku Mathenge; Paul Courtright Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 2.655