BACKGROUND: The combined measurement of diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide (Dlno) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) is a simple, noninvasive tool, but methodologic factors might influence results and reproducibility. We thus quantified the influence of breath-hold time on Dlco and Dlno in subjects with or without airway disease. METHODS: Simultaneous single-breath measurements of Dlco and Dlno were performed in 10 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [mean +/- SD age, 33 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 69 +/- 28% of predicted] and 10 healthy subjects (age, 31 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 108 +/- 8% of predicted), using the Masterscreen PFT (Viasys/Jaeger; Höchberg, Germany), with 45 ppm of inspired nitric oxide (NO), and breath-hold times of 4 s, 6 s, 8 s, and 10 s. The last two of three consecutive measurements were used for analysis. RESULTS: In healthy subjects but not patients with CF, Dlno, and Dlco differed significantly (p < 0.05 each) between breath-hold times. Differences primarily occurred at 4 s and 10 s, while at 6 s and 8 s alveolar volume (VA), Dlno, Dlco, and Dlno/Dlco were similar. Variability of consecutive measurements (either three or the last two measurements) did not depend on breath-hold time. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in healthy subjects were 4.9% and 2.5%, respectively, and 4.2% and 3.2% at 6 s. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in CF patients were 4.4% and 1.9%, and 7.4% and 3.3% at 6 s. CONCLUSIONS: Single-breath determinations of dlno and dlco showed no difference between breath-hold times of 6 s and 8 s in subjects with or without airway obstruction, and reproducibility was acceptable. Standardization of breath-hold time for Dlno measurements seems important for clinical and research comparisons.
BACKGROUND: The combined measurement of diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide (Dlno) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) is a simple, noninvasive tool, but methodologic factors might influence results and reproducibility. We thus quantified the influence of breath-hold time on Dlco and Dlno in subjects with or without airway disease. METHODS: Simultaneous single-breath measurements of Dlco and Dlno were performed in 10 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) [mean +/- SD age, 33 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 69 +/- 28% of predicted] and 10 healthy subjects (age, 31 +/- 9 years; FEV(1), 108 +/- 8% of predicted), using the Masterscreen PFT (Viasys/Jaeger; Höchberg, Germany), with 45 ppm of inspired nitric oxide (NO), and breath-hold times of 4 s, 6 s, 8 s, and 10 s. The last two of three consecutive measurements were used for analysis. RESULTS: In healthy subjects but not patients with CF, Dlno, and Dlco differed significantly (p < 0.05 each) between breath-hold times. Differences primarily occurred at 4 s and 10 s, while at 6 s and 8 s alveolar volume (VA), Dlno, Dlco, and Dlno/Dlco were similar. Variability of consecutive measurements (either three or the last two measurements) did not depend on breath-hold time. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in healthy subjects were 4.9% and 2.5%, respectively, and 4.2% and 3.2% at 6 s. At 8 s, mean variabilities of Dlno and Dlco in CFpatients were 4.4% and 1.9%, and 7.4% and 3.3% at 6 s. CONCLUSIONS: Single-breath determinations of dlno and dlco showed no difference between breath-hold times of 6 s and 8 s in subjects with or without airway obstruction, and reproducibility was acceptable. Standardization of breath-hold time for Dlno measurements seems important for clinical and research comparisons.
Authors: Joachim Saur; Frederik Trinkmann; Christina Doesch; Armin Scherhag; Joachim Brade; Stefan O Schoenberg; Martin Borggrefe; Jens J Kaden; Theano Papavassiliu Journal: Lung Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Astrid Thomas; Birgitte Hanel; Jacob L Marott; Frederik Buchvald; Jann Mortensen; Kim G Nielsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin Chaumont; Vanessa Tagliatti; El Mehdi Channan; Jean-Marie Colet; Alfred Bernard; Sofia Morra; Guillaume Deprez; Alain Van Muylem; Nadia Debbas; Thomas Schaefer; Vitalie Faoro; Philippe van de Borne Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Holger Dressel; Laura Filser; Rainald Fischer; Katharina Marten; Ullrich Müller-Lisse; Dorothea de la Motte; Dennis Nowak; Rudolf M Huber; Rudolf A Jörres Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Gerald Stanley Zavorsky; Ahmad Saleh Almamary; Mobarak Khalid Alqahtani; Shi Huh Samuel Shan; Douglas Shawn Gardenhire Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Courtney M Wheatley; Wayne J Morgan; Nicholas A Cassuto; William T Foxx-Lupo; Cori L Daines; Mary A Morgan; Hanna Phan; Eric M Snyder Journal: Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med Date: 2013-12-10
Authors: Anna Winkler; Kathrin Kahnert; Jürgen Behr; Claus Neurohr; Nikolaus Kneidinger; Rudolf Hatz; Holger Dressel; Thomas Radtke; Rudolf A Jörres Journal: Respir Res Date: 2018-09-10