Literature DB >> 18263647

What is the harm-benefit ratio of Cox-2 inhibitors?

T P van Staa1, L Smeeth, I Persson, J Parkinson, H G M Leufkens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selective cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitors, developed to reduce the risk of NSAID-related gastrointestinal (GI) complications, have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our objective was to determine the balance of potential harm and benefit related to Cox-2 inhibitors' exposure.
METHODS: The study population included patients aged 40+ years who received a prescription for Cox-2 inhibitors and were included in the General Practice Research Database. The incidence of upper GI events, myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke was estimated in this cohort. It was assumed that patients had experienced the upper GI and cardiovascular effects, as observed in clinical trials [relative rate (RR) of 0.49 for upper GI and 1.86 for MI]. Simulation methodology was used to estimate attributable risks, i.e. the difference between exposed and unexposed event probabilities.
RESULTS: The study population included 155,439 Cox-2 users. The number of upper GI events prevented by Cox-2 inhibitors was 179, while the number of excess MI cases was 83 per 10,000 patients treated for 4 years. A strong association was found between extent of GI benefit and cardiovascular harm. There was a large difference in the frequency of benefit over harm in only 6% of the patients (difference of 1% or more); 23% of the patients had more harm than benefit, including those with a history of ischaemic heart disease.
CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of Cox-2 inhibitors in reducing the frequency of upper GI events may be offset by their cardiovascular harm, particularly in patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18263647     DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  8 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to drug safety: a pharmacovigilance tool kit.

Authors:  Lesley Wise; John Parkinson; June Raine; Alasdair Breckenridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource.

Authors:  Tim Williams; Tjeerd van Staa; Shivani Puri; Susan Eaton
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2012-04

3.  Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases.

Authors:  Stephanie J Reisinger; Patrick B Ryan; Donald J O'Hara; Gregory E Powell; Jeffery L Painter; Edward N Pattishall; Jonathan A Morris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in cell proliferation and cell death in human malignancies.

Authors:  Cyril Sobolewski; Claudia Cerella; Mario Dicato; Lina Ghibelli; Marc Diederich
Journal:  Int J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-17

5.  Population impact of regulatory activity restricting prescribing of COX-2 inhibitors: ecological study.

Authors:  Benedict W Wheeler; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter Stephens; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  The role of inflammatory and oxidative stress mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease: focus on astrocytes.

Authors:  Rituraj Niranjan
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Frederik Keus; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Potential of prescription registries to capture individual-level use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Denmark: trends in utilization 1999-2012.

Authors:  Morten Schmidt; Jesper Hallas; Søren Friis
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.