Literature DB >> 18262619

Use of resorbable collagen dural substitutes in the presence of cranial and spinal infections-report of 3 cases.

Todd D McCall1, Daniel W Fults, Richard H Schmidt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various allografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials are used in neurosurgery to repair dural defects when primary suture closure is impossible and autologous grafts are inadequate or inaccessible. When used in contaminated or infected wounds, however, nonautologous grafts promote chronic colonization and recurring infection. Recently, several resorbable dural substitutes that are broken down biologically and replaced by autologous tissues have been introduced. These include type 1 collagen matrix (DuraGen, Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, NJ) and a collagen implant derived from bovine skin (Durepair, Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn), which can be applied as sutured or sutureless onlay grafts. The safety and efficacy of this material has not been reported in the setting of wound contamination or infection. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: We present 3 cases in which these new collagen dural substitutes were successfully used to close dural defects in the presence of wound contamination and infection. In one case, a lumbar dural defect was closed with DuraGen in the presence of a subdural empyema. In the second case, maceration of the cranial dura mater from extensive compound depressed skull fractures was repaired with DuraGen in the presence of a subgaleal abscess. In the third case, a large dural defect in the setting of frontal osteomyelitis was successfully closed with sutured Durepair. In all cases appropriate antibiotic coverage was provided for the infection, and the tissues healed with excellent biologic incorporation and without evidence of further infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Resorbable collagen dural grafts appear to be effective alternatives to either primary dural closure or the use of autologous-harvested tissue grafts in the setting of grossly contaminated or infected wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18262619     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  6 in total

1.  Experimental evaluation of new chitin-chitosan graft for duraplasty.

Authors:  M Pogorielov; A Kravtsova; G C Reilly; V Deineka; G Tetteh; O Kalinkevich; O Pogorielova; R Moskalenko; G Tkach
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Radially aligned, electrospun nanofibers as dural substitutes for wound closure and tissue regeneration applications.

Authors:  Jingwei Xie; Matthew R Macewan; Wilson Z Ray; Wenying Liu; Daku Y Siewe; Younan Xia
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 3.  Skull Base Trauma: Clinical Considerations in Evaluation and Diagnosis and Review of Management Techniques and Surgical Approaches.

Authors:  Jacob S Feldman; Soroush Farnoosh; Robert M Kellman; Sherard A Tatum
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  New dried human amniotic membrane is useful as a substitute for dural repair after skull base surgery.

Authors:  Takahiro Tomita; Nakamasa Hayashi; Motonori Okabe; Toshiko Yoshida; Hideo Hamada; Shunro Endo; Toshio Nikaido
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-10

5.  Cells and tissue interactions with glycated collagen and their relevance to delayed diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Huijuan Liao; Julia Zakhaleva; Weiliam Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Spinal Subdural Abscess Following Laminectomy for Symptomatic Stenosis: A Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alexander D Ramos; John D Rolston; Grant E Gauger; Paul S Larson
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.