Derek J Fisher1, Alain Labelle, Verner J Knott. 1. Department of Psychology/Institute of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., Canada. Derek.Fisher@rohcg.on.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine pre-attentive acoustic change detection in schizophrenia patients with and without auditory hallucinations via mismatch negativity (MMN) extracted from a multi-feature paradigm. METHODS: This study examined the electroencephalograph (EEG)-derived MMN, recorded across 32 sites, in 12 hallucinating patients (HPs) with schizophrenia, 12 non-hallucinating patients (NPs) with schizophrenia and 12 healthy controls (HCs). MMN was recorded in response to a multi-feature MMN paradigm [Näätänen, R., et al., 2004. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin. Neurophys. 115, 140-144] which employs frequency, duration, intensity, location and gap deviants. Differences in source localization were probed using standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). RESULTS: HPs showed significantly smaller MMNs to duration deviants compared to HCs and NPs, as well as smaller MMNs to intensity deviants compared to HCs. Regionalized differences between HCs and each of the patient groups were observed in response to frequency deviants. There were no significant group effects for location or gap deviants, or for MMN latency. Source localization using sLORETA showed no significant differences in MMN generator location across groups for any of the deviant stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The often-reported robust MMN deficit to duration deviants may be specific to schizophrenia patients afflicted with auditory hallucinations. Furthermore, by using symptom-specific groups, novel deficits of pre-attentive auditory processing, such as that observed to intensity deviants in HPs, may be revealed. SIGNIFICANCE: The differential responding observed between both groups of patients with schizophrenia has implications for automatic processing within the auditory cortex of hallucinating patients and suggests that care must be taken when recruiting participants in studies involving schizophrenia to ensure consistent, replicable results.
OBJECTIVE: To examine pre-attentive acoustic change detection in schizophreniapatients with and without auditory hallucinations via mismatch negativity (MMN) extracted from a multi-feature paradigm. METHODS: This study examined the electroencephalograph (EEG)-derived MMN, recorded across 32 sites, in 12 hallucinatingpatients (HPs) with schizophrenia, 12 non-hallucinatingpatients (NPs) with schizophrenia and 12 healthy controls (HCs). MMN was recorded in response to a multi-feature MMN paradigm [Näätänen, R., et al., 2004. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin. Neurophys. 115, 140-144] which employs frequency, duration, intensity, location and gap deviants. Differences in source localization were probed using standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). RESULTS: HPs showed significantly smaller MMNs to duration deviants compared to HCs and NPs, as well as smaller MMNs to intensity deviants compared to HCs. Regionalized differences between HCs and each of the patient groups were observed in response to frequency deviants. There were no significant group effects for location or gap deviants, or for MMN latency. Source localization using sLORETA showed no significant differences in MMN generator location across groups for any of the deviant stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The often-reported robust MMN deficit to duration deviants may be specific to schizophreniapatients afflicted with auditory hallucinations. Furthermore, by using symptom-specific groups, novel deficits of pre-attentive auditory processing, such as that observed to intensity deviants in HPs, may be revealed. SIGNIFICANCE: The differential responding observed between both groups of patients with schizophrenia has implications for automatic processing within the auditory cortex of hallucinatingpatients and suggests that care must be taken when recruiting participants in studies involving schizophrenia to ensure consistent, replicable results.
Authors: Judith M Ford; Thomas Dierks; Derek J Fisher; Christoph S Herrmann; Daniela Hubl; Jochen Kindler; Thomas Koenig; Daniel H Mathalon; Kevin M Spencer; Werner Strik; Remko van Lutterveld Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Judith M Ford; Vanessa A Palzes; Brian J Roach; Steven G Potkin; Theo G M van Erp; Jessica A Turner; Bryon A Mueller; Vincent D Calhoun; Jim Voyvodic; Aysenil Belger; Juan Bustillo; Jatin G Vaidya; Adrian Preda; Sarah C McEwen; Daniel H Mathalon Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Veronica B Perez; Scott W Woods; Brian J Roach; Judith M Ford; Thomas H McGlashan; Vinod H Srihari; Daniel H Mathalon Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Megan A Perrin; Pamela D Butler; Joanna DiCostanzo; Gina Forchelli; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Dean F Salisbury; Nicola R Polizzotto; Paul G Nestor; Sarah M Haigh; Justine Koehler; Robert W McCarley Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Evelien De Groote; Annelies Bockstael; Dick Botteldooren; Patrick Santens; Miet De Letter Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 3.575