OBJECTIVES: An endothelial cell (EC)-specific angiogenesis assay was developed to functionally characterize angiogenic properties of 2 distinct putative endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs): early EPCs and late outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs). BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells promote revascularization of ischemic tissue. However, the nature of different EPCs and their role in angiogenesis remains debated. METHODS: Tubulogenesis was assessed by immunohistochemistry in co-cultures of differentiated ECs (including human umbilical vein, coronary artery, and microvascular ECs) or non-ECs with monolayers of human fibroblasts (MRC5). Using adaptations of the co-culture assay, early EPCs and OECs, isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were assessed by 3-dimensional immunofluorescence microscopy for their capacity for: 1) independent tubulogenesis; 2) incorporation into pre-existing vascular networks; and 3) paracrine angiogenic effects using transwell cultures. RESULTS: Branched interconnecting EC-specific tubules formed with all differentiated ECs after 72 h. Proangiogenic and antiangiogenic agents modulated tubulogenesis appropriately (vascular endothelial growth factor 10 ng: +142 +/- 13%, 1 microM anti-vascular endothelial growth factor: -44 +/- 7% vs. control, p < 0.001). In contrast, early EPCs, along with nonendothelial cell types, failed to independently form tubules or incorporate into differentiated EC tubules. Nevertheless, early EPCs indirectly augmented tubulogenesis by differentiated ECs even when physically separated by transwells (+115 +/- 4% vs. control; p < 0.001). By contrast, OECs independently formed tubules and incorporated into differentiated EC tubules but exerted no significant paracrine angiogenic effects. CONCLUSIONS: A novel EC-specific tubulogenesis assay highlights strikingly different angiogenic properties of different EPCs: late OECs directly participate in tubulogenesis, whereas early EPCs augment angiogenesis in a paracrine fashion, with implications for optimizing cell therapies for neovascularization.
OBJECTIVES: An endothelial cell (EC)-specific angiogenesis assay was developed to functionally characterize angiogenic properties of 2 distinct putative endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs): early EPCs and late outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs). BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells promote revascularization of ischemic tissue. However, the nature of different EPCs and their role in angiogenesis remains debated. METHODS: Tubulogenesis was assessed by immunohistochemistry in co-cultures of differentiated ECs (including human umbilical vein, coronary artery, and microvascular ECs) or non-ECs with monolayers of human fibroblasts (MRC5). Using adaptations of the co-culture assay, early EPCs and OECs, isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were assessed by 3-dimensional immunofluorescence microscopy for their capacity for: 1) independent tubulogenesis; 2) incorporation into pre-existing vascular networks; and 3) paracrine angiogenic effects using transwell cultures. RESULTS: Branched interconnecting EC-specific tubules formed with all differentiated ECs after 72 h. Proangiogenic and antiangiogenic agents modulated tubulogenesis appropriately (vascular endothelial growth factor 10 ng: +142 +/- 13%, 1 microM anti-vascular endothelial growth factor: -44 +/- 7% vs. control, p < 0.001). In contrast, early EPCs, along with nonendothelial cell types, failed to independently form tubules or incorporate into differentiated EC tubules. Nevertheless, early EPCs indirectly augmented tubulogenesis by differentiated ECs even when physically separated by transwells (+115 +/- 4% vs. control; p < 0.001). By contrast, OECs independently formed tubules and incorporated into differentiated EC tubules but exerted no significant paracrine angiogenic effects. CONCLUSIONS: A novel EC-specific tubulogenesis assay highlights strikingly different angiogenic properties of different EPCs: late OECs directly participate in tubulogenesis, whereas early EPCs augment angiogenesis in a paracrine fashion, with implications for optimizing cell therapies for neovascularization.
Authors: Seo Rin Kim; Alfonso Eirin; Sandra M S Herrmann; Ahmed Saad; Luis A Juncos; Amir Lerman; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Marlen Kolbe; Eva Dohle; Denise Katerla; Charles James Kirkpatrick; Sabine Fuchs Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Kreton Mavromatis; Diane J Sutcliffe; Giji Joseph; R Wayne Alexander; Edmund K Waller; Arshed A Quyyumi; W Robert Taylor Journal: J Biomol Screen Date: 2012-08-17