OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate a novel, angle-independent, feature-tracking method for the echocardiographic quantitation of regional function. BACKGROUND: A new echocardiographic method, Velocity Vector Imaging (VVI) (syngo Velocity Vector Imaging technology, Siemens Medical Solutions, Ultrasound Division, Mountain View, California), has been introduced, based on feature tracking-incorporating speckle and endocardial border tracking, that allows the quantitation of endocardial strain, strain rate (SR), and velocity. METHODS: Seven dogs were studied during baseline, and various interventions causing alterations in regional function: dobutamine, 5-min coronary occlusion with reperfusion up to 1 h, followed by dobutamine and esmolol infusions. Echocardiographic images were acquired from short- and long-axis views of the left ventricle. Segment-length sonomicrometry crystals were used as the reference method. RESULTS: Changes in systolic strain in ischemic segments were tracked well with VVI during the different states of regional function. There was a good correlation between circumferential and longitudinal systolic strain by VVI and sonomicrometry (r = 0.88 and r = 0.83, respectively, p < 0.001). Strain measurements in the nonischemic basal segments also demonstrated a significant correlation between the 2 methods (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant relation was observed for circumferential and longitudinal SR between the 2 methods (r = 0.94, p < 0.001 and r = 0.90, p < 0.001, respectively). The endocardial velocity relation to changes in strain by sonomicrometry was weaker owing to significant cardiac translation. CONCLUSIONS: Velocity Vector Imaging, a new feature-tracking method, can accurately assess regional myocardial function at the endocardial level and is a promising clinical tool for the simultaneous quantification of regional and global myocardial function.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to validate a novel, angle-independent, feature-tracking method for the echocardiographic quantitation of regional function. BACKGROUND: A new echocardiographic method, Velocity Vector Imaging (VVI) (syngo Velocity Vector Imaging technology, Siemens Medical Solutions, Ultrasound Division, Mountain View, California), has been introduced, based on feature tracking-incorporating speckle and endocardial border tracking, that allows the quantitation of endocardial strain, strain rate (SR), and velocity. METHODS: Seven dogs were studied during baseline, and various interventions causing alterations in regional function: dobutamine, 5-min coronary occlusion with reperfusion up to 1 h, followed by dobutamine and esmolol infusions. Echocardiographic images were acquired from short- and long-axis views of the left ventricle. Segment-length sonomicrometry crystals were used as the reference method. RESULTS: Changes in systolic strain in ischemic segments were tracked well with VVI during the different states of regional function. There was a good correlation between circumferential and longitudinal systolic strain by VVI and sonomicrometry (r = 0.88 and r = 0.83, respectively, p < 0.001). Strain measurements in the nonischemic basal segments also demonstrated a significant correlation between the 2 methods (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant relation was observed for circumferential and longitudinal SR between the 2 methods (r = 0.94, p < 0.001 and r = 0.90, p < 0.001, respectively). The endocardial velocity relation to changes in strain by sonomicrometry was weaker owing to significant cardiac translation. CONCLUSIONS: Velocity Vector Imaging, a new feature-tracking method, can accurately assess regional myocardial function at the endocardial level and is a promising clinical tool for the simultaneous quantification of regional and global myocardial function.
Authors: Neil L Greenberg; Michael S Firstenberg; Peter L Castro; Michael Main; Agnese Travaglini; Jill A Odabashian; Jeanne K Drinko; L Leonardo Rodriguez; James D Thomas; Mario J Garcia Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Maxime Cannesson; Masaki Tanabe; Matthew S Suffoletto; David Schwartzman; John Gorcsan Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Brage H Amundsen; Thomas Helle-Valle; Thor Edvardsen; Hans Torp; Jonas Crosby; Erik Lyseggen; Asbjørn Støylen; Halfdan Ihlen; João A C Lima; Otto A Smiseth; Stig A Slørdahl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stian Langeland; Jan D'hooge; Patrick F Wouters; H Alex Leather; Piet Claus; Bart Bijnens; George R Sutherland Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-10-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amil M Shah; Susan Cheng; Hicham Skali; Justina Wu; Judy R Mangion; Dalane Kitzman; Kunihiro Matsushita; Suma Konety; Kenneth R Butler; Ervin R Fox; Nakela Cook; Hanyu Ni; Josef Coresh; Thomas H Mosley; Gerardo Heiss; Aaron R Folsom; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: David B Hanna; Shuo Xu; Michal L Melamed; Franklyn Gonzalez; Matthew A Allison; Martin S Bilsker; Barry E Hurwitz; Mayank M Kansal; Neil Schneiderman; Sanjiv J Shah; Robert C Kaplan; Carlos J Rodriguez; Jorge R Kizer Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 2.778