BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most used scale for neck pain and disability. There is no validated Spanish version so far. This prospective study's objective was to evaluate a Spanish version's comprehension and metrics characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The Spanish version of the NDI was obtained by the "translation-backward translation" method. This version and the pain visual analogue scale were both administered 2 times to 48 patients with nonnespecific or posttraumatic neck pain. RESULTS: 16% had comprehension troubles. The cultural level had no influence on it. Items more commonly called into question were the IX (neck pain and sleeping) and the VII (neck pain and working). The scales were fulfilled in 6 min 08 s (54 s) by those with middle-high cultural level, and in 7 min 59 s (1 min 26 s) by those with low one (p < 0.001). As shown by factor analysis, our NDI version is a one-dimension scale. Internal consistence was very good (Cronbach alpha of 0.937 at the first time and 0.944 at the second one). An optimal test-retest reliability was settled by intraclass correlation coefficient (0.978) and by Bland-Altman plot. For the construct validity, correlation with the pain visual analogue Scale was 0.643 (p < 0.01) at first time, and 0.743 (p < 0.01) at second one. This was the only metric characteristic where the cultural level had any influence. CONCLUSIONS: On reformulation of some items, our NDI Spanish version's feasibility will allow its use for future definitive validation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most used scale for neck pain and disability. There is no validated Spanish version so far. This prospective study's objective was to evaluate a Spanish version's comprehension and metrics characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The Spanish version of the NDI was obtained by the "translation-backward translation" method. This version and the pain visual analogue scale were both administered 2 times to 48 patients with nonnespecific or posttraumatic neck pain. RESULTS: 16% had comprehension troubles. The cultural level had no influence on it. Items more commonly called into question were the IX (neck pain and sleeping) and the VII (neck pain and working). The scales were fulfilled in 6 min 08 s (54 s) by those with middle-high cultural level, and in 7 min 59 s (1 min 26 s) by those with low one (p < 0.001). As shown by factor analysis, our NDI version is a one-dimension scale. Internal consistence was very good (Cronbach alpha of 0.937 at the first time and 0.944 at the second one). An optimal test-retest reliability was settled by intraclass correlation coefficient (0.978) and by Bland-Altman plot. For the construct validity, correlation with the pain visual analogue Scale was 0.643 (p < 0.01) at first time, and 0.743 (p < 0.01) at second one. This was the only metric characteristic where the cultural level had any influence. CONCLUSIONS: On reformulation of some items, our NDI Spanish version's feasibility will allow its use for future definitive validation.
Authors: Vanessa González Rueda; Carlos López de Celis; Martín Eusebio Barra López; Andoni Carrasco Uribarren; Sara Castillo Tomás; Cesar Hidalgo García Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Leonardo Gregorio Antúnez Sánchez; María de la Casa Almeida; Jesús Rebollo Roldán; Antonio Ramírez Manzano; Rocío Martín Valero; Carmen Suárez Serrano Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 1.137
Authors: Vanessa González-Rueda; César Hidalgo-García; Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Elena Bueno-Gracia; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt; Pere Ramón Rodríguez-Rubio; Carlos López-de-Celis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Luis Martín-Sacristán; Cesar Calvo-Lobo; Daniel Pecos-Martín; Josué Fernández-Carnero; José Luis Alonso-Pérez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: María Carmen Sánchez-González; Verónica Pérez-Cabezas; Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez; Carmen Ruiz-Molinero; Manuel Rebollo-Salas; José Jesús Jiménez-Rejano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rosa Gómez-Rodríguez; Belén Díaz-Pulido; Carlos Gutiérrez-Ortega; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz; Miguel Malo-Urriés; Jaime Corral-de-Toro; Carlos López-de-Celis; María Orosia Lucha-López; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno; Ana I Lorente; César Hidalgo-García Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.390