L Steed1, D Cooke, S J Hurel, S P Newman. 1. Centre for Behavioural & Social Sciences in Medicine, University College London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: User acceptability of new health technologies is important in determining their widespread use and adoption. The aim of this current study was twofold: first, to investigate the acceptability of two continuous glucose monitoring devices for people with diabetes; and second, to develop a valid questionnaire measure to assess the acceptability of continuous glucose monitoring devices. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six people with diabetes who had previously used the GlucoWatchBiographer (Animas Corp., West Chester, PA) or the CGMS continuous glucose monitoring system (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) in order to increase understanding of the issues relating to acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the devices. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using framework analysis. These analyses, together with consultation with researchers and health professionals in the field, provided the foundation for development of a questionnaire measure that was piloted with 19 individuals. RESULTS: Six broad themes were elicited from the framework analysis: interference with daily activities; reliability and accuracy of the devices; practicality and ease of use; improvements in glycemic control; side effects; and self-consciousness and disclosure. Piloting of the questionnaire arising from this analysis demonstrated face validity. Further psychometric testing of the questionnaire will be conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the CGMS and GlucoWatch G2 Biographer. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately it is the user's preferences and his or her assessment of acceptability that will determine uptake and use of continuous glucose monitoring devices. It is therefore essential to consider and evaluate this alongside clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: User acceptability of new health technologies is important in determining their widespread use and adoption. The aim of this current study was twofold: first, to investigate the acceptability of two continuous glucose monitoring devices for people with diabetes; and second, to develop a valid questionnaire measure to assess the acceptability of continuous glucose monitoring devices. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six people with diabetes who had previously used the GlucoWatchBiographer (Animas Corp., West Chester, PA) or the CGMS continuous glucose monitoring system (Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) in order to increase understanding of the issues relating to acceptability of, and satisfaction with, the devices. Interview transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using framework analysis. These analyses, together with consultation with researchers and health professionals in the field, provided the foundation for development of a questionnaire measure that was piloted with 19 individuals. RESULTS: Six broad themes were elicited from the framework analysis: interference with daily activities; reliability and accuracy of the devices; practicality and ease of use; improvements in glycemic control; side effects; and self-consciousness and disclosure. Piloting of the questionnaire arising from this analysis demonstrated face validity. Further psychometric testing of the questionnaire will be conducted as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the CGMS and GlucoWatch G2 Biographer. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately it is the user's preferences and his or her assessment of acceptability that will determine uptake and use of continuous glucose monitoring devices. It is therefore essential to consider and evaluate this alongside clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Authors: Katharine D Barnard; Korey K Hood; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Chris Aldred; Nick Oliver; Lori Laffel Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 6.118