Literature DB >> 18259880

Degradation rates of aged petroleum hydrocarbons are likely to be mass transfer dependent in the field.

Katarina Björklöf1, Jani Salminen, Pirjo Sainio, Kirsten Jørgensen.   

Abstract

Evidence for on site biodegradation may be difficult to provide at heterogeneous sites without additional experiments in controlled laboratory conditions. In this study, microbial activities measured as CO2 and CH4 production were compared in situ, in intact soil cores and in bottle microcosms containing sieved soils. In addition, biodegradation rates were determined by measuring the decrease in petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations at 7 degrees C in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Elevated concentrations of CO2 and CH4 in the soil gas phase indicated that both the aerobic and anaerobic microbial activity potentials were high at the contaminated site. Aerobic and anaerobic microbial degradation rates in laboratory experiments of petroleum hydrocarbons were highest in soils from the most contaminated point and degradation in the aerobic and anaerobic microcosms was linear throughout the incubation, indicating mass-transfer-dependent degradation. Different results for microbial activity measurements were obtained in laboratory studies depending on pretreatment and size of the sample, even when the environmental conditions were mimicked. These differences may be related to differences in the gas exchange rates as well as in changes in the bioavailability of the contaminant in different analyses. When predicting by modeling the behavior of an aged contaminant it is relevant to adapt the models in use to correspond to conditions relevant at the contaminated sites. The variables used in the models should be based on data from the site and on experiments performed using the original aged contaminant without any additions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259880     DOI: 10.1007/s10653-008-9148-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Geochem Health        ISSN: 0269-4042            Impact factor:   4.609


  8 in total

1.  Time scales of organic contaminant dissolution from complex source zones: coal tar pools vs. blobs.

Authors:  Christina Eberhardt; Peter Grathwohl
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.188

2.  Effect of aging of chemicals in soil on their biodegradability and extractability.

Authors:  P B Hatzinger; M Alexander
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Potential of preliminary test methods to predict biodegradation performance of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil.

Authors:  H Aichberger; Marion Hasinger; Rudolf Braun; Andreas P Loibner
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  The abundance of nahAc genes correlates with the 14C-naphthalene mineralization potential in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated oxic soil layers.

Authors:  Pirjo M Tuomi; Jani M Salminen; Kirsten S Jørgensen
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-12-27       Impact factor: 4.194

5.  Occurrence and rates of terminal electron-accepting processes and recharge processes in petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated subsurface.

Authors:  Jani M Salminen; Pekka J Hänninen; Jussi Leveinen; Petri T J Lintinen; Kirsten S Jørgensen
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Potential for aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in boreal subsurface.

Authors:  Jani M Salminen; Pirjo M Tuomi; Anna-Mari Suortti; Kirsten S Jørgensen
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Evaluation of the intrinsic methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) biodegradation potential of hydrocarbon contaminated subsurface soils in batch microcosm systems.

Authors:  David Moreels; Leen Bastiaens; Frans Ollevier; Roel Merckx; Ludo Diels; Dirk Springael
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Does bioavailability limit biodegradation? A comparison of hydrocarbon biodegradation and desorption rates in aged soils.

Authors:  Michael H Huesemann; Tom S Hausmann; Tim J Fortman
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Katarina Björklöf; Sanja Karlsson; Asa Frostegård; Kirsten S Jørgensen
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2009-05-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.