PURPOSE: We previously reported that BRCA1 interacts with aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) and that this interaction affects TCDD-induced CYP1A1 gene expression (Kang et al., J Biol Chem 281:14654-14662, 2006). In this study we continue this investigation and begin to define the significance of this interaction for the regulation of stress-induced transcription. METHODS: Immunoprecipitations (IPs), western blot (WB) analysis, GST pull-down assays and promoter reporter assays were used to investigate whether the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) can regulate transcription that is dependent on the activation domain 1 (AD1) domain of BRCA1. RESULTS: We show that AhR, a transcription factor, can bind specifically to AD1 in the C-terminal region of BRCA1 and affect BRCA1's ability to regulate transcription activity. We found that xenobiotics that positively and negatively affect AhR's activity as a transcription factor (e.g., dioxin and alpha-naphthoflavone, respectively), have similar effects on AhR's ability to affect AD1-domain-dependent transcription. These physical and functional AhR-AD1 interactions may require the coiled-coil motif in AD1 because point-mutations in this motif reduce these interactions. CONCLUSION: Xenobiotic-activated AhR can function in two ways, as a component of the AhR/ARNT transcription factor and a regulator of AD1-dependent transcription. Consequently, BRCA1 has two distinct mechanisms for sensing xenobiotics and regulating AhR-dependent stress responses to these xenobiotics. We speculate that the normal functioning of this interaction could play a role in BRCA1's tumor suppressing ability.
PURPOSE: We previously reported that BRCA1 interacts with aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) and that this interaction affects TCDD-induced CYP1A1 gene expression (Kang et al., J Biol Chem 281:14654-14662, 2006). In this study we continue this investigation and begin to define the significance of this interaction for the regulation of stress-induced transcription. METHODS: Immunoprecipitations (IPs), western blot (WB) analysis, GST pull-down assays and promoter reporter assays were used to investigate whether the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) can regulate transcription that is dependent on the activation domain 1 (AD1) domain of BRCA1. RESULTS: We show that AhR, a transcription factor, can bind specifically to AD1 in the C-terminal region of BRCA1 and affect BRCA1's ability to regulate transcription activity. We found that xenobiotics that positively and negatively affect AhR's activity as a transcription factor (e.g., dioxin and alpha-naphthoflavone, respectively), have similar effects on AhR's ability to affect AD1-domain-dependent transcription. These physical and functional AhR-AD1 interactions may require the coiled-coil motif in AD1 because point-mutations in this motif reduce these interactions. CONCLUSION: Xenobiotic-activated AhR can function in two ways, as a component of the AhR/ARNT transcription factor and a regulator of AD1-dependent transcription. Consequently, BRCA1 has two distinct mechanisms for sensing xenobiotics and regulating AhR-dependent stress responses to these xenobiotics. We speculate that the normal functioning of this interaction could play a role in BRCA1's tumor suppressing ability.
Authors: Oliver Moennikes; Sandra Loeppen; Albrecht Buchmann; Patrik Andersson; Carina Ittrich; Lorenz Poellinger; Michael Schwarz Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Patrik Andersson; Jacqueline McGuire; Carlos Rubio; Katarina Gradin; Murray L Whitelaw; Sven Pettersson; Annika Hanberg; Lorenz Poellinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-07-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tisha C King-Heiden; Vatsal Mehta; Kong M Xiong; Kevin A Lanham; Dagmara S Antkiewicz; Alissa Ganser; Warren Heideman; Richard E Peterson Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: Hyo Jin Kang; Young Bin Hong; Hee Jeong Kim; Yong Weon Yi; Raghu G Nath; Young Soo Chang; Ho-Chan Cho; Insoo Bae Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Hyo Jin Kang; Young Bin Hong; Hee Jeong Kim; Olga C Rodriguez; Raghu G Nath; Elena M Tilli; Christopher Albanese; Fung-Lung Chung; Sang Hoon Kwon; Insoo Bae Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mele N Avilla; Kristen M C Malecki; Mark E Hahn; Rachel H Wilson; Christopher A Bradfield Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 3.739