Literature DB >> 18259738

The effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive TMS on the input/output properties of the human corticospinal pathway.

E Houdayer1, A Degardin, F Cassim, P Bocquillon, P Derambure, H Devanne.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the effects of various parameters (notably the frequency and intensity) of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the primary motor (M1) and premotor (PMC) cortices on the excitability of the first dorsalis interosseus (FDI) corticospinal pathway. To this end, we applied a comprehensive input-output analysis after fitting the experimental results to a sigmoidal function. Twenty-six healthy subjects participated in the experiments. Repetitive TMS was applied either over M1 or PMC at 1 Hz (LF) for 30 min (1,800 pulses) or at 20 Hz (HF) for 20 min (1,600 pulses). In the HF condition, the TMS intensity was set to 90% (HF(90)) of the FDI's resting motor threshold (RMT). In the LF condition, the TMS intensity was set to either 90% (LF(90)) or 115% (LF(115)) of the RMT. The FDI input/output (I/O) curve was measured on both sides of the body before rTMS (the Pre session) and then during two Post sessions. For each subject, the I/O curves (i.e., the integral of the FDI motor-evoked potential (MEP) vs. stimulus intensity) were fitted using a Boltzmann sigmoidal function. The graph's maximum slope, S (50) and plateau value were then compared between Pre and Post sessions. LF(115) over M1 increased the slope of the FDI I/O curve but did not change the S (50) and plateau value. This also suggested an increase in the RMT. HF(90) led to a more complex effect, with an increase in the slope and a decrease in the S (50) and plateau value. We did not see a cross effect on the homologous FDI corticospinal pathway, and only PMC LF(90) had an effect on ipsilateral corticospinal excitability. Our results suggest that rTMS may exert a more complex influence on cortical network excitability than is usually reported (i.e. simple inhibitory or facilitatory effects). Analysis of the fitted stimulus response curve indicates a dichotomous influence of both low- and high-frequency rTMS on M1 cortical excitability; this may reflect intermingled effects on excitatory and inhibitory cortical networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259738     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1294-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Jose Rafael Romero; David Anschel; Roland Sparing; Massimo Gangitano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex.

Authors:  W Gerschlager; H R Siebner; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Repeated premotor rTMS leads to cumulative plastic changes of motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  Tobias Bäumer; Rüdiger Lange; Joachim Liepert; Cornelius Weiller; Hartwig R Siebner; John C Rothwell; Alexander Münchau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Martin Lotze; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Functional connectivity of human premotor and motor cortex explored with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Münchau; B R Bloem; K Irlbacher; M R Trimble; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer's cramp.

Authors:  H R Siebner; J M Tormos; A O Ceballos-Baumann; C Auer; M D Catala; B Conrad; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Shaping the excitability of human motor cortex with premotor rTMS.

Authors:  Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; Nicola Modugno; Alessandra Pesenti; Alexander Münchau; Willibald Gerschlager; Ruth M Webb; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over premotor cortex can improve cortical tremor.

Authors:  E Houdayer; H Devanne; L Tyvaert; L Defebvre; P Derambure; F Cassim
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  33 in total

1.  Slow (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induces a sustained change in cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sasa R Filipović; John C Rothwell; Kailash Bhatia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects.

Authors:  P Li Voti; A Conte; A Suppa; E Iezzi; M Bologna; M S Aniello; G Defazio; J C Rothwell; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Differential intensity-dependent effects of magnetic stimulation on the longest neurites and shorter dendrites in neuroscreen-1 cells.

Authors:  Ching-Yi Lin; Whitney J Huang; Kevin Li; Roy Swanson; Brian Cheung; Vernon W Lin; Yu-Shang Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Therapeutic approaches for shankopathies.

Authors:  Xiaoming Wang; Alexandra L Bey; Leeyup Chung; Andrew D Krystal; Yong-Hui Jiang
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.964

6.  Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Efficient and reliable characterization of the corticospinal system using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sahana N Kukke; Rainer W Paine; Chi-Chao Chao; Ana C de Campos; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.177

8.  A neuronal network model for simulating the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on local field potential power spectra.

Authors:  Alina Bey; Stefan Leue; Christian Wienbruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targeted to Premotor Cortex Followed by Primary Motor Cortex Modulates Excitability Differently Than Premotor Cortex or Primary Motor Cortex Stimulation Alone.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Huiqiong Deng; Rebekah L Schmidt; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2015-08-26

10.  Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation Over the Right Orbitofrontal Cortex in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Weiwei Liu; Hua Shao; Jing Liao; Dalu Yang; Maoliang Ma; Jianli Yang
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.