Literature DB >> 1825971

The management of intrauterine devices following uterine perforation.

A Adoni1, A Ben Chetrit.   

Abstract

The generally accepted indications for removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device (IUD) are: a) a closed variety of IUD, b) medicated IUDs with copper or hormone release, and c) a medico-legal or psychological problem. A perforated IUD can be left in the peritoneal cavity if it is made of non-irritating plastic. The copper IUD causes adhesions, but these lead to few cases of serious complications. The reason for removal of the IUD stems only from the fear of adhesion formation. Our experience, supported by the literature, leads us to believe that this indication should no longer be accepted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesions; Asia; Case Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--complications; Developed Countries; Diseases; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Israel; Iud--complications; Mediterranean Countries; Perforations; Postpartum Programs; Pregnancy; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Retention; Signs And Symptoms; Studies; Uterine Perforation; Western Asia

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1825971     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90128-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  14 in total

1.  Incidental detection of a transmigrated intrauterine device.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Levsky; Mark Herskovits
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-05-14

2.  Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Mustafa Kaplanoğlu; Mehmet Bülbül; Tuncay Yüce; Dilek Kaplanoğlu; Meral Aban
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

3.  Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication.

Authors:  Sujnanendra Mishra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Amy Stoddard; Colleen McNicholas; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Laparoscopic retrieval of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon.

Authors:  Angie R Taras; Jedediah A Kaufman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Successful Conservative Management of a Dislocated IUD.

Authors:  Hasan Ali Inal; Zeynep Ozturk Inal; Ender Alkan
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-12

7.  Laparoscopic removal of migrated intrauterine device embedded in intestine.

Authors:  Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Tehilla Apfel; Rozhin Naghshizadian; John Morgan Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and removal of an intrauterine device translocated to the right subdiaphragmal region: a case report.

Authors:  Salih Krasniqi; Elvis Ahmeti; Sejdullah A Hoxha; Halit Ymeri; Ismet Shaqiri; Nexhmije B Kastrati-Spahija; Avdyl S Krasniqi
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-08-25

Review 9.  Elective surgical removal of migrated intrauterine contraceptive devices from within the peritoneal cavity: a comparison between open and laparoscopic removal.

Authors:  Frances R Mosley; Navneel Shahi; Mohamed A Kurer
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Authors:  Sam Rowlands; Emeka Oloto; David H Horwell
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.