BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We examined white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV) and subclinical infarction (no history of clinical stroke; SI) in relation to performance on tests of sequencing, cognitive flexibility, and sensorimotor ability. METHODS: The Northern Manhattan Study includes a stroke-free community-based sample of Hispanic, Black, and White participants. A subsample (n=656) has undergone measurement of WMHV, SI, and neuropsychological testing. Linear regression was used to examine WMHV and SI in relation to performance on tests of sequencing as measured by Color Trails 1, cognitive flexibility as measured by Color Trails 2, and sensorimotor ability as measured by Grooved Pegboard, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for the correlation among the cognitive tests and other covariates. RESULTS: Considering performance on the tests of sequencing, cognitive flexibility, and sensorimotor ability simultaneously using GEE, WMHV and subclinical infarction were each associated with worse cognitive performance globally. There was a threshold effect for WMHV with those in the upper quartile performing significantly worse on the tests of cognitive flexibility and sensorimotor ability. Those with frontal SI performed worse on the test of cognitive flexibility and those with deep SI, worse on the test of sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Both SI and WMHV were associated with globally worse cognitive performance. Participants with WMH affecting more than 0.75% of cranial volume had significantly slower performance on a task of cognitive flexibility and sensorimotor ability than those in the lowest quartile. The effects of SI on cognitive performance varied by location.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We examined white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV) and subclinical infarction (no history of clinical stroke; SI) in relation to performance on tests of sequencing, cognitive flexibility, and sensorimotor ability. METHODS: The Northern Manhattan Study includes a stroke-free community-based sample of Hispanic, Black, and White participants. A subsample (n=656) has undergone measurement of WMHV, SI, and neuropsychological testing. Linear regression was used to examine WMHV and SI in relation to performance on tests of sequencing as measured by Color Trails 1, cognitive flexibility as measured by Color Trails 2, and sensorimotor ability as measured by Grooved Pegboard, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for the correlation among the cognitive tests and other covariates. RESULTS: Considering performance on the tests of sequencing, cognitive flexibility, and sensorimotor ability simultaneously using GEE, WMHV and subclinical infarction were each associated with worse cognitive performance globally. There was a threshold effect for WMHV with those in the upper quartile performing significantly worse on the tests of cognitive flexibility and sensorimotor ability. Those with frontal SI performed worse on the test of cognitive flexibility and those with deep SI, worse on the test of sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: Both SI and WMHV were associated with globally worse cognitive performance. Participants with WMH affecting more than 0.75% of cranial volume had significantly slower performance on a task of cognitive flexibility and sensorimotor ability than those in the lowest quartile. The effects of SI on cognitive performance varied by location.
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Niels D Prins; Tom den Heijer; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R L Sacco; R T Benson; D E Kargman; B Boden-Albala; C Tuck; I F Lin; J F Cheng; M C Paik; S Shea; L Berglund Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tien Yin Wong; Ronald Klein; A Richey Sharrett; David J Couper; Barbara E K Klein; Duan-Ping Liao; Larry D Hubbard; Thomas H Mosley Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Monika Hollander; Ewoud J van Dijk; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Vladimir Hachinski; Costantino Iadecola; Ron C Petersen; Monique M Breteler; David L Nyenhuis; Sandra E Black; William J Powers; Charles DeCarli; Jose G Merino; Raj N Kalaria; Harry V Vinters; David M Holtzman; Gary A Rosenberg; Anders Wallin; Martin Dichgans; John R Marler; Gabrielle G Leblanc Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Karina Stavitsky; Yangchun Du; Daniel Seichepine; Thomas M Laudate; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Charles Decarli; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Charles DeCarli; Claudia Kawas; John H Morrison; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Reisa A Sperling; Clinton B Wright Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Chuanhui Dong; Nooshin Nabizadeh; Michelle Caunca; Ying Kuen Cheung; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Charles DeCarli; Ralph L Sacco; Yaakov Stern; Clinton B Wright Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Beau M Ances; Archana Bhatt; Florin Vaida; Debralee Rosario; Terry Alexander; Jennifer Marquie-Beck; Ronald J Ellis; Scott Letendre; Igor Grant; J Allen McCutchan Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Hilary Glazer; Chuanhui Dong; Mitsuhiro Yoshita; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Charles DeCarli; Yaakov Stern; Clinton B Wright Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 9.910