PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if pretreatment endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings are predictive of outcome in patients who undergo external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Committee on Human Research approval, with waiver of the requirement for informed consent, was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty men with biopsy-proved prostate cancer (mean age, 59 years; range, 47-75 years) who underwent endorectal MR imaging of the prostate prior to external-beam radiation therapy were retrospectively identified; details of baseline tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Two experienced readers independently reviewed all MR imaging studies and recorded tumor T stage and the radial diameter of extracapsular extension (if present). Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between baseline imaging and clinical predictive variables and the end point of metastatic failure. RESULTS: At MR imaging, readers 1 and 2, respectively, considered 50 and 60 patients to have T1 or T2 disease (ie, organ-confined disease) and 30 and 20 patients to have T3 disease. After a mean follow-up of 43 months, four patients developed metastases. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that baseline serum prostate-specific antigen level, presence of extracapsular extension at MR imaging (according to either reader), and degree of extracapsular extension (according to either reader) were all significantly (P < .05) related to the development of metastases. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the sole independent predictive variable was mean diameter of extracapsular extension (relative hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.22, 3.48; P = .007). In particular, three of five patients with extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm at pretreatment MR imaging developed metastases 24, 43, and 63 months after therapy. CONCLUSION: The presence and degree of extracapsular extension at MR imaging prior to external-beam radiation therapy are important predictors of posttreatment metastatic recurrence.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine if pretreatment endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings are predictive of outcome in patients who undergo external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Committee on Human Research approval, with waiver of the requirement for informed consent, was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Eighty men with biopsy-proved prostate cancer (mean age, 59 years; range, 47-75 years) who underwent endorectal MR imaging of the prostate prior to external-beam radiation therapy were retrospectively identified; details of baseline tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Two experienced readers independently reviewed all MR imaging studies and recorded tumor T stage and the radial diameter of extracapsular extension (if present). Univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between baseline imaging and clinical predictive variables and the end point of metastatic failure. RESULTS: At MR imaging, readers 1 and 2, respectively, considered 50 and 60 patients to have T1 or T2 disease (ie, organ-confined disease) and 30 and 20 patients to have T3 disease. After a mean follow-up of 43 months, four patients developed metastases. Univariate Cox analysis revealed that baseline serum prostate-specific antigen level, presence of extracapsular extension at MR imaging (according to either reader), and degree of extracapsular extension (according to either reader) were all significantly (P < .05) related to the development of metastases. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the sole independent predictive variable was mean diameter of extracapsular extension (relative hazard ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.22, 3.48; P = .007). In particular, three of five patients with extracapsular extension of more than 5 mm at pretreatment MR imaging developed metastases 24, 43, and 63 months after therapy. CONCLUSION: The presence and degree of extracapsular extension at MR imaging prior to external-beam radiation therapy are important predictors of posttreatment metastatic recurrence.
Authors: K K Yu; J Scheidler; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; C J Zaloudek; R G Males; S J Nelson; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Scheidler; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; K K Yu; D L Sokolov; L R Huang; C J Zaloudek; S J Nelson; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Daniel H Clarke; Stephen J Banks; A Roger Wiederhorn; John W Klousia; Jeanne M Lissy; Michelle Miller; Arnold M Able; Carlos Artiles; William V Hindle; Deborah N Blair; Russell R Houk; Michael J Sheridan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Ying Lu; Kirk D Jones; Mark G Swanson; Silvia D Chang; Peter R Carroll; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hedvig Hricak; Liang Wang; David C Wei; Fergus V Coakley; Oguz Akin; Victor E Reuter; Mithat Gonen; Michael W Kattan; Chinyere N Onyebuchi; Peter T Scardino Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M L Schiebler; B C Yankaskas; C Tempany; C E Spritzer; M D Rifkin; H M Pollack; P Holtz; E A Zerhouni Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Z Fuks; S A Leibel; K E Wallner; C B Begg; W R Fair; L L Anderson; B S Hilaris; W F Whitmore Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Rajpal Dhingsa; Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Kirk D Jones; Mark G Swanson; Peter R Carroll; Hedvig Hricak; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Valdair F Muglia; Antonio C Westphalen; Zhen J Wang; John Kurhanewicz; Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Antonio C Westphalen; Walter J Koff; Fergus V Coakley; Valdair F Muglia; John M Neuhaus; Ralph T Marcus; John Kurhanewicz; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Antonio C Westphalen; Fergus V Coakley; Mack Roach; Charles E McCulloch; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Apurva A Bonde; Elena K Korngold; Bryan R Foster; Antonio C Westphalen; David R Pettersson; Megan L Troxell; Jeffry P Simko; Fergus V Coakley Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Tim Joseph; David A McKenna; Antonio C Westphalen; Fergus V Coakley; Shoujun Zhao; Ying Lu; I-Chow Hsu; Mack Roach; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Benedict Oerther; Moritz V Buren; Christina M Klein; Simon Kirste; Nils H Nicolay; Tanja Sprave; Simon Spohn; Deepa Darshini Gunashekar; Leonard Hagele; Lars Bielak; Michael Bock; Anca-L Grosu; Fabian Bamberg; Matthias Benndorf; Constantinos Zamboglou Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.155