Literature DB >> 18258411

Screening for discomfort as the fifth vital sign using an electronic medical recording system: a feasibility study.

Tatsuya Morita1, Koji Fujimoto, Miki Namba, Emi Kiyohara, Satoshi Takada, Ritsuko Yamazaki, Kimiyo Taguchi.   

Abstract

Late referral to a specialized palliative care service hinders quality symptomatic management. The aim of this article is to describe the feasibility and clinical usefulness of screening for patient discomfort as the fifth vital sign using an electronic medical recording system to identify patients with undertreated physical symptoms. For the electronic medical recording system, all admitted patients received routine nurse assessment of discomfort (defined as any physical symptom) at every vital signs check using Item 2 of the Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version (STAS). All medically treated cancer patients admitted to seven oncology units were automatically screened at one-week intervals. Positive screening was defined as a STAS score of 2 or more at least two times during the previous week. For each patient identified by screening, a palliative care team reviewed the medical record and provided written recommendations when other treatments might improve the patient's physical symptoms. Of 629 patients screened, 87 (14%) initially met the positive screening criteria. Fifteen (17%) were false positive due to psychiatric symptoms without physical symptoms or due to misrecording. Of 72 cases with actual discomfort, 33 had already been referred to the palliative care team, 14 had received adequate palliative care as determined by the palliative care team, 14 had self-limiting transient discomfort, and one patient died before the screening day. In the remaining 10 cases (11% of symptomatic patients, 1.7% of all screened patients), the palliative care team recommended potentially useful interventions for symptom control; seven patients were referred to the palliative care team within one week. The time required for all screening processes was about 30 minutes per week. This experience demonstrates that screening for patient discomfort as the fifth vital sign using an electronic medical recording system can be successfully implemented and may be useful in facilitating early referral of distressing patients to the specialized palliative care service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258411     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  4 in total

1.  Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Jonathan Sussman; Lorraine Martelli-Reid; Greg Pond; Daryl Bainbridge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care.

Authors:  Ruth A Bush; Alexa Pérez; Tanja Baum; Caroline Etland; Cynthia D Connelly
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-07-06

3.  Pain as the fifth vital sign-A comparison between public and private healthcare systems.

Authors:  Daniel Humberto Pozza; Luís Filipe Azevedo; José Manuel Castro Lopes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementia.

Authors:  Valentina Lichtner; Dawn Dowding; S José Closs
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.