Literature DB >> 18258398

Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.

Xiao-Ming Sun1.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in the absence and presence of contralateral noise at five levels--below, equal to, and above the middle-ear muscle (MEM) reflex threshold. The resultant changes in DPOAE level and phase were dependent on stimulus frequency and noise level. Both low-level noise, believed to elicit the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex, and high-level noise, thought to activate both MOC and MEM reflexes, significantly decreased the DPOAE level. However, the shift from sole MOC effect to mixed MOC and MEM effects was not as dramatic as we thought. While low-level noise resulted in a minimum DPOAE phase change, high-level noise caused a substantial phase lead for 1 and 2kHz. With increasing frequency, phase lag became more notable. The present study suggests the following: (1) DPOAE contralateral suppression by low-level sound most likely does not involve the effect of the MEM reflex and signal crossover; and (2) combined analysis of DPOAE level and phase changes warrants further investigations to overcome the difficulty in separating the effects of MOC efferents and MEM contraction. The results also imply that OAE measurement has the potential for being used to investigate the effect of the MEM reflex on sound transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18258398     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

4.  Effects of cochlear synaptopathy on middle-ear muscle reflexes in unanesthetized mice.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; Stéphane F Maison; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Identifying the Origin of Effects of Contralateral Noise on Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Unanesthetized Mice.

Authors:  Yingyue Xu; Mary Ann Cheatham; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

6.  Changes in Acoustic Absorbance Pre- and Post-Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Jordan M Racca; Laura L Jones; Robert T Dwyer; Mary Ferguson; Linsey Sunderhaus; Linda J Hood; René H Gifford
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

8.  Efferent modulation of pre-neural and neural distortion products.

Authors:  S B Smith; K Ichiba; D S Velenovsky; B Cone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Contralateral efferent suppression of human hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-15

10.  Contralateral Inhibition of Click- and Chirp-Evoked Human Compound Action Potentials.

Authors:  Spencer B Smith; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Barbara K Cone
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.