Literature DB >> 18257858

Upper-pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective review of treatment safety and efficacy.

Asif Raza1, Sami Moussa, Gordon Smith, David A Tolley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the safety and efficacy of supracostal puncture during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 12-year period, 66 patients had either an upper-pole puncture alone or combined with middle- or lower-pole puncture during PCNL for renal calculi. All punctures were made by an experienced uroradiologist and were either supra- or subcostal. We retrospectively reviewed all case notes and radiographs to determine stone-clearance rates and complications associated with the site and number of punctures.
RESULTS: There was an overall stone-free rate of 78% with upper-pole puncture alone or combined with middle- or lower-pole puncture. There was a 3% thoracic complication rate with upper pole punctures, and an overall complication rate of 30% for both thoracic and non-thoracic complications.
CONCLUSION: Upper-pole puncture in PCNL is associated with minimum morbidity if done by an experienced urologist or radiologist. The stone-free rate appears to be more dependent on stone size and complexity than the site of puncture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18257858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07388.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Treating lower pole renal stones: in defence of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  John Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Supracostal access for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of supracostal and infracostal approaches.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ismail Basibuyuk; Onur Kucuktopcu; Yunus Kayali; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Li Wang; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  RE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Authors:  Mohd Nazli Kamarulzaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Image-Guided Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Single-Center Experience in 591 Patients.

Authors:  Patrick L Vande Lune; David Thayer; Naganathan Mani; Andrew Warren; Alana C Desai; Daniel J Picus; Andrew J Gunn
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-07-20

6.  Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing complex renal calculi.

Authors:  Rohit Singh; S P Kankalia; Vilas Sabale; Vikram Satav; Deepak Mane; Abhirudra Mulay; Bhupender Kadyan; Naveen Thakur
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Prospective evaluation of complications using the modified Clavien grading system, and of success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Guy's Stone Score: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Swarnendu Mandal; Apul Goel; Rohit Kathpalia; Satyanarayan Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Rahul J Sinha; Bhupender P Singh; Divakar Dalela
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Retrograde upper-pole calyceal access for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy of stones in the lower-pole calyx.

Authors:  Khalid M Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-09-23

9.  Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Maneesh Sinha; Pramod Krishnappa; Santosh Kumar Subudhi; Venkatesh Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Foo Cheong Ng; Wai Loon Yam; Tze Ying Benjamin Lim; Jin Kiat Teo; Kok Kit Ng; Sey Kiat Lim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.