Literature DB >> 18257856

Urinary cytology and nuclear matrix protein 22 in the detection of bladder cancer recurrence other than transitional cell carcinoma.

Georg C Hutterer1, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Craig Zippe, Gerson Lüdecke, Hans Boman, Marta Sanchez-Carbayo, Roberto Casella, Christine Mian, Martin G Friedrich, Sanaa Eissa, Hideyuki Akaza, Vincenzo Serretta, Hans Hedelin, Raina Rupesh, Naoto Miyanaga, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Paul Perrotte, Yair Lotan, Michael J Marberger, Shahrokh F Shariat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22), compared with urinary cytology, in predicting the recurrence of bladder cancer that is not transitional cell carcinoma (non-TCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We tested the sensitivity, specificity and the predictive accuracy of NMP22 in the context of non-TCC bladder cancer recurrence, and compared it to the performance of urinary cytology. The study group comprised 2687 patients with history of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer from 10 centres across four continents.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 64.8 years and 75.4% were men; of all patients, 513 (19.1%) had positive urinary cytology, 906 (33.7%) had a positive NMP22 test (>or=10 units/mL) and 80 (3.0%) had non-TCC recurrence. Most of these, i.e. 60 (75%), were stage >or=T2. The sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology were, respectively, 20.0% and 94.8%, vs 77.5% and 81.8% for NMP22 of >or=10 units/mL. The predictive accuracy of urinary cytology was 57.5%, vs 87.1% for NMP22 >or= 10 units/mL. A combined model that included dichotomized NMP22 and urinary cytology was 85.3% accurate.
CONCLUSION: The ability of a NMP22 level of >or=10 units/mL to predict non-TCC recurrence was better than that of urinary cytology, suggesting that NMP22 might have a role in the surveillance of patients at risk of non-TCC recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18257856     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07352.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Use and Promise of Urinary Markers for Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  William Tabayoyong; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  New and promising strategies in the management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

3.  Assessing the clinical benefit of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the surveillance of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and negative cytology: a decision-curve analysis.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Thomas F Chromecki; Maxine Sun; Douglas S Scherr; Richard K Lee; Giovanni Lughezzani; Mesut Remzi; Michael J Marberger; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Urinary tumor markers could predict survival in bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Ragaa H M Salama; Tahia H Selem; Mohammed El-Gammal; Abd-Elmoneim A Elhagagy; Sally M Bakar
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-10-02

Review 5.  Bladder cancer detection in patients with neurogenic bladder: are cystoscopy and cytology effective, and are biomarkers pertinent as future diagnostic tools? A scoping review.

Authors:  Marc Sbizzera; Françoise Descotes; Théo Arber; Paul Neuville; Alain Ruffion
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  The contemporary role and impact of urine-based biomarkers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Igor Duquesne; Lars Weisbach; Atiqullah Aziz; Luis A Kluth; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  MtDNA As a Cancer Marker: A Finally Closed Chapter?

Authors:  Elmar Kirches
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.236

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.