Elasticity imaging is a reconstructive imaging technique where tissue motion in response to mechanical excitation is measured using modern imaging systems, and the estimated displacements are then used to reconstruct the spatial distribution of Young's modulus. Here we present an ultrasound elasticity imaging method that utilizes the model-based technique for Young's modulus reconstruction. Based on the geometry of the imaged object, only one axial component of the strain tensor is used. The numerical implementation of the method is highly efficient because the reconstruction is based on an analytic solution of the forward elastic problem. The model-based approach is illustrated using two potential clinical applications: differentiation of liver hemangioma and staging of deep venous thrombosis. Overall, these studies demonstrate that model-based reconstructive elasticity imaging can be used in applications where the geometry of the object and the surrounding tissue is somewhat known and certain assumptions about the pathology can be made.
Elasticity imaging is a reconstructive imaging technique where tissue motion in response to mechanical excitation is measured using modern imaging systems, and the estimated displacements are then used to reconstruct the spatial distribution of Young's modulus. Here we present an ultrasound elasticity imaging method that utilizes the model-based technique for Young's modulus reconstruction. Based on the geometry of the imaged object, only one axial component of the strain tensor is used. The numerical implementation of the method is highly efficient because the reconstruction is based on an analytic solution of the forward elastic problem. The model-based approach is illustrated using two potential clinical applications: differentiation of liver hemangioma and staging of deep venous thrombosis. Overall, these studies demonstrate that model-based reconstructive elasticity imaging can be used in applications where the geometry of the object and the surrounding tissue is somewhat known and certain assumptions about the pathology can be made.
Elasticity imaging or elastography is a method to remotely
estimate elastic properties of biological tissues
[1-4].
One of the approaches in elasticity imaging is based on the
measurement of local tissue deformation as tissue responds to
external or internal quasi-static mechanic loading. Ultrasound,
MRI, or other methods can be used to measure the resultant
internal tissue motion. Using inverse problem formulations, the
elasticity (Young's modulus) distribution is evaluated based on
the distribution of the strain tensor components. Initially,
elasticity imaging was focused on the noninvasive cancer
diagnosis, but then the approach proved to be useful in various
other applications including detection of atherosclerotic plaques
[5, 6], corneal refractive surgery [7], cardiac strain
imaging [8], muscle biomechanics
[9], and so forth.Once the internal tissue motion is measured, the strain image in
the tissue can be produced. Usually hard tissue regions are less
deformed in comparison with soft regions and, therefore, contrast
in strain images is influenced by the tissue elasticity. However,
the strain field depends not only on the elastic distribution, but
also on global boundary conditions which can be very complicated
in real tissues. As a result, the relationship between strain
image and elasticity distribution in tissue is not straightforward
and reconstruction of Young's modulus is required to determine
tissue elasticity quantitatively. Elastic modulus reconstruction
in an inhomogeneous material using remote measurements of internal
displacements can be posed in a number of ways
[10-18]. These approaches can be
generally grouped into two categories: direct and indirect
(model-based) reconstruction techniques. If all necessary
components of the internal displacement vector and strain tensor
are available at any point within the object, then reconstruction
algorithms based on the mechanical equilibrium equations can be
used to describe the unknown distribution of Young's or shear
modulus—these techniques, therefore, belong to
direct reconstruction methods. Unfortunately, in direct reconstruction
methods, it is often difficult to formulate and solve the inverse
problem for an arbitrary geometry and elasticity distribution.
However, if any prior knowledge or assumptions about the geometry
of the object and boundary conditions can be made, the inverse
problem can be solved by using repeated solutions of forward
problems with adjusted elasticity parameters. Indeed, if
elasticity variations of the object within the region of interest
can be modeled based on the object geometry or any other
assumptions, then a model-based reconstruction can be performed.
Therefore, the model-based elasticity imaging methods could be
useful in applications where the existence of the pathology is
already determined from the imaging study and pathology
characterization rather than detection is required. In such cases,
the approximate location and geometry of the pathology is known
and certain assumption about tissue elasticity distribution can be
made. Note here, that both direct and model-based approaches
provide information only about relative elasticity distribution.
For absolute Young's modulus reconstruction, either reference
point or measurements of stress are required.Ultrasound is widely used in elasticity imaging since motion of
the speckle can be tracked over large range of tissue
deformations. However, the accuracy of the lateral displacement
estimates is less accurate than axial component of the
displacement vector. Indeed, for an ultrasound system, the
resolution of axial displacement is limited primarily by the
frequency bandwidth of the transducer, and the lateral resolution
is determined by the width of the ultrasound beam
[19, 20].
Since all displacement components and spatial derivatives are
needed in direct reconstruction methods, the anisotropy in the
accuracy of the displacement vector measurements is an additional
source of noise in elasticity images. In contrast, model-based
approaches can be formulated using only axial component of the
displacement vector to insure that the quality of Young's modulus
reconstruction is independent from the quality of lateral motion
tracking.Here we present the model-based elasticity imaging approach
illustrated using two potential clinical applications:
characterization of liver hemangiomas and differentiation of deep
venous thrombi (DVT). For liver hemangioma, the spherical symmetry
of the lesion was assumed, and for DVT a blood clot was described
as a cylindrically symmetry object. In both cases, the external
surface deformations were applied during continuous ultrasound
imaging, and the measurements of tissue motion were performed
using block-matching cross-correlation technique. Based on the
measured strain images, the Young's modulus was reconstructed.
These studies demonstrate that model-based reconstructive
elasticity imaging can be used in applications where the geometry
of the object and the surrounding tissue is assessable and certain
assumptions about the pathology can be made from the ultrasound
images.
2. THEORY
The model-based elasticity reconstruction technique is performed
in two successive steps. First, the analytical solution of the
forward elastic problem is derived where the displacement and
strain fields are determined based on the spatial distribution of
Young's modulus in the object and pattern of externally applied
deformation. Second, the inverse problem is solved iteratively,
where the solution of the forward problem for a modeled object is
compared with experimentally measured strains to match the unknown
spatial distribution of Young's modulus in a region of interest
(ROI). The Young's modulus distribution providing the best
agreement is assumed to describe the distribution of elastic
properties in the region of interest.
2.1. Forward problem
The formulation of a forward problem is based on a uniaxial
deformation of an infinite, incompressible medium with spherical
or cylindrically shaped inhomogeneities. Here, we consider only
incompressible media since most soft tissues are very close to
incompressible materials [21]. The forward problem is
formulated in a spherical system of coordinates
(r, φ, θ) for spherical inclusions and in cylindrical
coordinates (r, φ, z) for cylindrical inclusions. The
origins of the coordinate systems are placed at the centers of the
inhomogeneities. The polar axis of both systems of coordinates is
along an applied deformation, that is, an angle ϕ is between
a radius vector and the deformation direction (see
Figure 1). It is assumed that Young's modulus
E(r)
is a function of only radial position. To find the solution of
forward problem for arbitrary Young's modulus E(r) over an ROI,
we presume that the Young's modulus is constant within each
subinterval [r, r
], that is, E(r) :
E = const, r ∈ [r, r
], i = 1 ⋯ N, where N is the total
number of subintervals covering the region of interest [22].
The displacement vector must satisfy the equations of
static equilibrium for isotropic incompressible linear medium on
each subinterval [r, r
] [23]:
where p is static internal pressure and μ is shear elastic
modulus. For incompressible media, the shear modulus and Young's
modulus are related (μ = E/3),
and only one modulus (μ or E) is sufficient to describe the elastic properties of the material. In addition, the incompressibility condition must be
satisfied: div = 0.
Figure 1
Schematic
representation of the deformation model. (x, y) refer to
Cartesian system of coordinates and (r, φ) refer to either
cylindrical or spherical system of coordinates. The inhomogeneity
is approximated as a layered round object, where the Young's or
shear modulus is a function of only the radial coordinate
r.
Based on Goodier's solution [24,
25], we attempt to find the
solution of (1) under the assumption of spherical
symmetry (3D case) in the form
where the displacement vector components are
= (u, u, u).Similarly, solution of (1) under the assumption of
cylindrical symmetry (2D case) can be found in the following form:
where the components of the displacement vector are
= (u, u, u).Using the incompressibility condition, the relationships between
the V(r) and V(r) areSubstituting expressions (2)–(4) into
(1) and eliminating the pressure, we find V(r):Arbitrary constants c
1
,
c
2
, c
3
,
c
4
vary for
each [r
, r
] layer. These unknown constants can be found
using boundary conditions and the stress and displacement
continuity conditions at the boundaries of each layer. To satisfy
boundary conditions for (1), the displacements u
and u must be zero at r = 0 (the solution is limited at
the center of the system of coordinates), and must match the
strains applied at infinity. For uniaxial loading, the condition
must be satisfied, where ε
0 is axial strain at
infinity. For homogeneous media, the solution of spherical and
cylindrical problems (5) is the same linear function
V(r) = ε
0⋅
r.Hence, the solution of (1) for a specific elasticity
distribution can be reduced to the solution of a linear system of
algebraic equations. This fact allows us to simplify and to speed
up the solution of the forward problem and, as a result, to
construct an effective procedure for inverse problem solution.
2.2. Inverse problem
The inverse problem was formulated using a Cartesian system of
coordinates since a linear array ultrasound probe was used to
measure the internal displacements and the ultrasound images were
inherently obtained in a Cartesian system of coordinates (x, y, z)
as evident from the ultrasound and strain images presented in
Figure 2. Therefore, the analytical solutions of the
forward problems formulated in spherical and cylindrical systems
of coordinates were converted to a Cartesian system of
coordinates. By pushing the ultrasound transducer against the
skin, the external surface deformations we applied were such that
the ultrasound beam is along the direction of applied deformation.
Figure 2
Liver hemangioma (a) B-Scan (left) and (b) strain image
(right). The images are 38-mm by 78-mm.
In ultrasound strain imaging, the quality of axial strain
estimates (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio and resolution) is higher
than that of other strain tensor components [19, 20].
Therefore, it is desired to construct the inverse problem solution
using only one experimentally measured axial component of the
strain tensor ɛ = ∂u/∂ y, where
u is the axial component of the displacement vector in
Cartesian coordinates.The theoretical distribution of axial strain in the region of
interest can be computed when the following parameters are known:
Young's moduli over a set of layers, the center of the
inhomogeneity (x
0, y
0), and the effective deformation ɛ
0 at infinity. Using the analytic solution of the
forward problem and having experimentally measured the axial
strain component, the unknown Young's modulus E can be
estimated by minimizing the error function, that is, the
difference between experimentally measured and theoretically
predicted axial strains [22]:In general, the deformation ɛ
0 and the center
(x
0, y
0) of the object can be considered unknown and
estimated simultaneously with the unknown distribution of the
Young's modulus E by minimizing the error function.
Alternatively, the applied deformation ɛ
0 and the
center (x
0, y
0) of the object can be derived based on some
a priori information.Hence, elasticity reconstruction reduces to a minimization of the
error function of (7) with respect to the unknown
elasticity distribution, the geometry of the object, and the
details of external loading.To minimize (7), a gradient-based iterative procedure
was implemented [22,
26]. The step size of the gradient method
was chosen based on three estimates of error function δ
The minimum of the error function was locally predicted using a
second-order polynomial approximation of δ as a function
of the unknown parameters under the restriction of a decreasing
error. Then, a global linear prediction for all unknowns was used
simultaneously to increase the rate of convergence, that is,
iterative step sizes for the gradient method were chosen taking
into account the second-order polynomial approximation of δ
as a function of unknown parameters. This iterative process does
not require any additional derivatives of displacement or strain
and, therefore, compared to direct elasticity reconstruction
methods, does not introduce additional noise associated with
higher-order derivatives of the displacement vector and strain
tensor components. The high computational speed is achieved by
using the analytical solution to calculate forward problem with
only a small number of unknown parameters.
3. ELASTICITY RECONSTRUCTION OF LIVER HEMANGIOMA
Hemangioma is the most prevalent benign tumor of the liver,
occurring in up to 70% of the population. Hemangiomas can vary in
size and be as large as several centimeters. These tumors are
filled with vascular channels of various sizes and may also
contain fibrous tissue. Thrombi (clotted blood) may be present in
the vascular channels. Histologically, the hemangioma is
characterized by large, thin-walled blood vessels completely
filled with blood [27].These asymptomatic lesions are often found incidentally on
ultrasound or CT when imaging studies are undertaken for other
reasons. Once diagnosed, no treatment is necessary, and only
large, symptomatic hemangiomata are treated by surgical resection.
The diagnosis of hemangioma, however, requires special imaging
studies such as nuclear medicine scans using radioactive
technicium tagged red blood cells, magnetic resonance or dynamic
CT scans with contrast.Liver hemangiomas can be clearly identified in the ultrasound
B-Scan image as a hyperechoic region, and the margins of the tumor
are usually well defined. However, routine ultrasound is
suggestive but usually not diagnostic. Many other tumors in liver,
some of which are malignant, may appear similar on the B-Scan.
Therefore, there is a need to specifically diagnose a detected
liver mass in the least invasive and most time/cost efficient way
available.In the literature, hemangiomas are often referred to as soft
lesions filled with blood [27]. Therefore, elasticity imaging
may help in the diagnosis of hemangiomas. Indeed, most solid
tumors are usually harder than the background, so hemangiomas may
be distinguished from other liver tumors based on their mechanical
properties.To test the hypothesis that elasticity imaging can detect and
diagnose hemangiomas, studies on volunteers with previously
diagnosed hemangioma were performed. All subjects gave informed
consent, and this study was approved by the University of Michigan
Institutional Review Board. In these experiments, the liver was
imaged between the ribs using an Ultramark-9 ATL scanner with a
linear 128-element array transducer operating at 5 MHz. The
system was interfaced with a custom-made circuit board to acquire
approximately 120 frames of real-time digital RF signals during 4
seconds. Within this interval, the array, attached to a
deformational device residing on a clinical trolley (gurney), was
pressed against the body to produce a modest deformation of the
liver. In most experiments, surface deformations did not exceed
10–12 mm, and all volunteers indicated no discomfort from the
applied stress.In all experiments, frame-to-frame motion was estimated using a
two-dimensional correlation-based phase-sensitive speckle tracking
technique [28]. The 2D displacement was estimated from
the position of the maximum correlation coefficient, where the
axial displacement estimate was refined using the position of the
phase zero crossing of the analytic signal correlation.
Displacement error was further reduced by filtering spatially
adjacent correlation functions prior to displacement estimation
[28].The ultrasound B-Scan image of a liver hemangioma is presented in
Figure 2(a). This image is a typical example of
hemangiomas, where the location, margins, and size of the tumor
are clearly identified. Furthermore, the muscle layers can be
easily recognized at the top. This and other images in
Figure 2 are 38-mm by 78-mm, where the transducer is
located at the top of the image.The distribution of the normal axial strain (ɛ)
is shown in Figure 2(b). This quantitative grayscale
image is displayed from 0 to 10 percent strain, where full black
corresponds to no strain and full white to 10% strain. The tumor
is clearly visible as a low strain region indicating that overall
it is harder than the background tissue.Similar results were obtained from several other volunteers. The
apparent overall hardness of a hemangioma, inferred from the
strain image, is unexpected given the soft interior of the tumor.
However, this result is consistent with information gathered by
surgeons in the operating room—when large, symptomatic
hemangiomata are treated by surgical resection, the intact
hemangiomas are felt as hard lesions. Pressure applied to the
hemangioma, however, ruptures it, releasing blood as it collapses.
Therefore, a hemangioma feels hard even it is filled with blood,
which has no or low-shear elasticity.In general, a soft, fluid-filled sack can appear hard if it is
encapsulated by a very hard, thin membrane. If the mechanical
properties of the shell are similar to that of the lesion, the
shell itself would not affect the strain pattern. If the shell is
harder than the lesion, however, the strain magnitude inside of
the lesion is reduced. In fact, for an infinitely hard and
absolutely noncompliant shell, the strain inside of the lesion
vanishes regardless of the internal material properties.
Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the thin membrane
encapsulating a hemangioma is significantly harder than the
lesion's core, and dominates the overall strain pattern within the
tumor. The mechanical properties of the shell surrounding a lesion
can significantly impact the strain distribution. In particular,
the strain images of a heterogeneous lesion surrounded by a hard
shell and a uniform hard inclusion appear very similar. It may be
possible, however, to estimate the lesion composition in both
cases using reconstructive elasticity imaging.For elasticity imaging of hemangiomas, the mapping of Young's
modulus was performed using two approaches: direct reconstruction
and model-based reconstruction. Direct reconstruction numerically
solves the discretized equilibrium equations for a plane strain
condition [10]. The plane strain condition is a reasonable
approximation for elasticity imaging of the liver, where
deformations are applied through the rib cage resulting in
negligible out-of-plane strains. This method does not require any
a priori knowledge of the object, and no other assumptions are
made. After defining a region of interest containing the lesion,
the Young's modulus distribution is reconstructed relative to the
modulus of the background tissue (i.e., liver).In model-based approach we assume that the hemangioma can be
modeled as a spherical object such that the elastic modulus within
the imaging plane is simply a function of radial position from the
center of the tumor. For a realistic tumor, this is a reasonable
approximation if the tumor is near no external boundaries.
Nevertheless, by assuming a simple model such as this, the
model-based reconstruction in the vicinity of the tumor core is
far less susceptible to strain noise compared to direct elasticity
reconstruction.The results of the elasticity reconstruction are presented in
Figure 3. In Figure 3(a), a 17.5-mm by
17.5-mm region of interest (ROI) of grayscale ultrasound image
containing the hemangioma is shown. In direct reconstruction
method (see Figure 3(b)), the Young's modulus along the
ROI boundary was set to unity, resulting in reconstruction of the
Young's modulus relative to liver. Clearly, the overall hemangioma
is harder than the background tissue, but it has a softer interior
part. This distribution is better depicted in the model-based
elasticity image (see Figure 3(c)), where the softer
interior part can be easily identified. In model-based
reconstruction, the hemangioma was initially modeled as a
homogeneous spherical inclusion, that is, object with one layer
only. For a given number of layers, the relative Young's modulus,
the external load ɛ
0 and position of hemangioma
center (x
0, y
0) were reconstructed by minimizing the error
function (7) across the ROI.
Figure 3
B-Scan (a) and elasticity images of hemangioma obtained
direct method (b) and model-based method (c).
The Young's modulus distributions along the horizontal line
intersecting the center of the hemangioma are contrasted in
Figure 4
indicating reasonable agreement between the
two different reconstruction approaches. In model-based
reconstruction approach, only 12 layers were used to describe
hemangioma. The results in Figures 3
and 4
correspond closely to the expected elasticity distribution within
the hemangioma, where the capsule surrounding the tumor makes the
lesion harder overall. Reconstructive elasticity imaging captures
the complex composition of such tumors.
Figure 4
The Young's modulus distributions, obtained using direct
and model-based reconstruction methods, are compared along the
horizontal line intersecting the center of the
hemangioma.
The results of this study suggest that diagnosis of liver
hemangioma may be possible with reconstructive elasticity imaging.
Strain imaging by itself may not be sufficient to differentiate
hemangioma from other types of liver tumors since all lesions
overall can produce somewhat similar strain images. In contrast,
the reconstructed elasticity map may capture the critical
differences between the tumors.
4. ELASTICITY RECONSTRUCTION OF DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
The leading cause of preventable in-hospital mortality in the USA
and other developed countries is pulmonary embolism (PE), which is
one of the complications of deep venous thrombosis [29]. DVT
occurs when the blood clot forms inside a deep vein (commonly
located in the calf or thigh) and either partially or completely
blocks the flow of blood in the vein. In pulmonary embolism, a
portion of the thrombus detaches from the vessel wall and travels
through the veins into the lung. When large emboli lodge in the
main pulmonary artery, pulmonary embolism can quickly become
fatal. The level of pulmonary embolism risk and DVT treatment
depend on the age of the clot (in this paper, we often refer to
DVT as blood clot). For an acute thrombus, the patient is at a
higher risk of the clot breaking off and becoming an embolus. This
patient is treated with heparin followed by oral anticoagulants.
Patients with chronic DVT are treated with either oral
anticoagulants, coumadin, alone, or no treatment [30].
Because the risk of bleeding is higher with heparin than with
coumadin, one would like to avoid the use of heparin if at all
possible [31]. Therefore it is clinically important to
distinguish between acute and chronic DVT.Both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and duplex ultrasound can
tell whether a thrombus is present [32,
33]. The problem is
that while these technologies can identify the blood clot in the
vein, they cannot determine its age. Studies suggest that elastic
properties of clot can be used to determine DVT maturity
[22,
34–41]. This is based on the assumption
that the Young's modulus of a thrombus changes monotonically with
fibrin and collagen concentration. Since both the fibrin and
collagen content of a thrombus increase over time, DVT hardens
with age. Consequently, remote estimation of the elastic
properties of a thrombus can become an important clinical tool to
age DVT.The examination employs real-time B-mode sonography (2D grayscale
ultrasound imaging) combined with color flow Doppler imaging and
compression ultrasound. During the compression ultrasound, a
transverse view of the veins and arteries of the patient's leg is
imaged. The operator periodically pushes on the surface of the
leg to deform the underlying tissue including vein and artery. If
the vein does not deform while the adjacent artery does, the clot
is suspected [33]. Since compression ultrasound already has
all of the essential ingredients of elasticity imaging (i.e.,
external deformation of the object during continuous ultrasound
imaging), elasticity imaging is a simple addition to the existing
procedure of DVT diagnosis [36].Animal studies were performed using a rat model of stasis-induced-venous thrombosis
[37, 38, 42, 43]. The protocol was
approved by the University of Michigan Committee on the use and
care of animals and strictly complied with the National Institutes
of Health Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. A
group of five rats were used in this study although only four
animals developed thrombi. On the first day, all rats underwent
surgery to initiate thrombus formation in the inferior vena cava
(IVC). As the animals developed thrombi, which changed
progressively from acute to chronic stages [42], each rat was
imaged on days 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 10.All experiments were performed using a Siemens “Elegra”
ultrasound scanner with a linear 12 MHz array transducer
(VFX13-5). First, the IVCs were scanned in transverse and
longitudinal orientations using color Doppler mode to determine
thrombus location and find the best possible probe position on the
rat's abdomen. Next, the transducer itself was used to compress
the rat's abdominal wall and underlying tissue in a transverse
orientation. It was attached to a manual deformation device to
achieve continuous compression. The deformation lasted
approximately 6 seconds, while phase sensitive ultrasound
frames were collected in real time. Consecutive frames were
processed offline using a 2D correlation-based phase-sensitive
speckle tracking algorithm to derive the strain image of the DVT
and surrounding tissue [28]. A kernel size 0.60-mm laterally
by 0.17-mm axially was chosen for cross-correlation. The
correlation function was filtered by a Hanning filter extending
1.20-mm laterally by 0.85-mm axially. Finally, frame-to-frame
displacements were accumulated over a number of frames within the
same deformation sequence and axial strains were calculated
numerically.An analysis of the B-scan in the thrombus area (see
Figure 5) was the starting point of elasticity
reconstruction for each animal. Based on the ultrasound image, the
ROIs for elasticity reconstruction and the position of the clot
center (x
0, y
0) were chosen. Each ROI was selected such
that it included the IVC and a small portion of surrounding tissue
(see Figure 6) to minimize elasticity variations of
background tissue. The elasticity reconstruction program creates
relative Young's modulus images—the stress distribution at the
surface in response to surface-applied deformations is required
for absolute reconstruction. Therefore, a vessel wall was used as
the reference material, that is, Young's modulus of the vessel
wall was assigned unity value.
Figure 5
Ultrasound B-scan image of rat's abdomen.
Figure 6
Elasticity reconstruction procedure demonstrated for a
rat with a 5-day old thrombus. (a) A 4.5-mm by 4.5-mm region of
interest (a) was selected for elasticity reconstruction. (b) The
measured axial strain image within selected ROI. (c) Reconstructed
Young's modulus distribution. (d) Corresponding theoretical axial
strain image.
A slight modification of described method was used for DVT
elasticity reconstruction. We assume that the external load is
applied at an angle α relative to the axial direction of
an ultrasound beam. The angle α was added to expression
(7) as a parameter of minimization. The details are
presented elsewhere [22]. Based on
the geometry of the thrombus, vessel, and surrounding tissue
(Figure 1), the clot-containing vessel is modeled as a
long round cylinder. At the beginning of the reconstruction, a
homogeneous cylindrical clot was assumed. The position of the clot
center (x
0, y
0) was manually set based on the ultrasound
image.Once the solution for a given number of rings was found, the
number of rings required to represent the object was increased.
The previous elasticity distribution and load parameters α
and ɛ
0 were used (after interpolation) as the
initial point for the next step, where thrombus, vessel wall, and
surrounding tissue were approximated using more independent rings
of different elasticity. This iterative process was continued
until the difference between two successive reconstructions (i.e.,
Young's modulus reconstructions for a different number of layers)
was less then 2%. In the final Young's modulus map, the number of
layers ranged from 30 to 40 depending on a particular dataset.A typical B-scan image of a rat's abdomen with 5-day old thrombus
is shown in Figure 5. This image covers 10-mm (axial)
by 8.5-mm (lateral) region. Using color-flow imaging, the artery
adjacent to the IVC was identified while no flow was detected in
the IVC signaling that the thrombus occluded the vessel. On the
bottom of the B-scan, the anterior surface of the spine can also
be noted. Figure 6
presents the results of model-based
elasticity reconstruction for the same rat. The 4.5-mm by 4.5-mm
elasticity reconstruction region (Figure 6(a), also
outlined rectangular area in Figure 5) was chosen to
include the entire IVC, with the clot located in the center, and a
small portion of background tissue. The measured axial strain
image is presented in Figure 6(b). This image is
displayed over a 0 to 18% strain dynamic range, where full white
represents no strain, and full black represents a normal axial
strain magnitude of 18% and larger (negative strain indicates
that vein size was reduced vertically during the deformation).Once the region of interest was identified, iterative elasticity
reconstruction was performed, where the experimentally measured
axial strain distribution ɛ
exp was compared
with the theoretically predicted axial strain map
ɛ
theory to minimize the error function
(7). The resultant Young's modulus distribution E
over a set of rings is presented in Figure 6(c) where a
grayscale map is used to display the relative Young's modulus over
the 0.5 to 1.0 range. The grayscale map was selected so that full
black corresponds to a relative Young's modulus of less than or
equal to 0.5, and white areas represent harder tissue. Finally,
Figure 6(d)
presents the theoretically predicted axial
strain distribution corresponding to reconstructed values of
Young's modulus in Figure 6(c).The minimization process is illustrated in Figures 7
and 8. Figure 7
shows changes in relative
Young's modulus during iterations. In this example, the number of
layers is fixed and equal to 5. The initial elasticity value was
taken from the previous step, where the number of layers was equal
to 4. During each iteration, the minimization of the error
function (7) was performed. Regions of rapid change in
elasticity (at iterations 5 and 25) correspond to successful
global linear prediction resulting in 5–10 times faster
convergence. Figure 8
presents behavior of relative
elasticity of thrombus as the number of rings is increased. These
results illustrate that 30–40 rings are sufficient to describe the
blood clot, vessel wall, and surrounding tissue for this
particular experimental dataset since further increase in the
number of rings does not change the final result.
Figure 7
Relative Young's modulus versus number of iterations for
blood clot approximated using 5 rings or layers. Initial value for
iterative process was chosen from previous 4-ring model. These
particular results correspond to the data presented in Figures
5
and 6
(an animal with 5-day old
thrombus).
Figure 8
Changes in relative Young's modulus with increased number
of layers or rings. These particular results correspond to the
data presented in Figures 5
and 6
(an animal
with 5-day old thrombus).
Figure 9
contrasts relative Young's modulus profiles
along the center of the
thrombus for one of the animals at 5, 8, and 10 days after the
surgery (the profile for 5-day old thrombus corresponds to results
presented in Figures 5–8).
Figure 10
presents the profiles of relative Young's
modulus for another animal with 4-day, 7-day, and 10-day old
thrombus. Note here, that position of vessel walls have changed
through time because of the vessel shrank in process of clot
formation [37, 38].
Figure 9
Young's modulus
profiles for 5-day old (acute), 8-day old (subacute), and 10-day
old (chronic) thrombi.
Figure 10
Young's modulus
profiles for 4-day old (acute), 7-day old (subacute), and 10-day
old (chronic) thrombi.
In this animal model, 3-day to 4-day old thrombus represents an
acute DVT, 6-day to 7-day old thrombus represents a subacute DVT,
and 10-day old thrombus represents a chronic DVT. The rate of
thrombus growth is different in humans, but the process of clot
formation has the same stages. As the thrombus develops, its
elasticity increases. This is further illustrated in
Figure 11, where relative Young's modulus is plotted
as function of time after surgery, that is, age of the thrombus.
Here, the elasticity values were averaged for the four rats used
in our study. Clearly, the relative elasticity of the clot
increases with thrombus age suggesting that Young's modulus can be
used to age DVT.
Figure 11
The model-based reconstructed values of relative Young's
modulus of the blood clot during formation and aging of
thrombus.
The results of in vivo elasticity reconstruction were compared
with the results of ex vivo direct elasticity measurements
[38]. A total of 59 Sprague-Dawley rats were studied. On days
3, 6, 10, 12, and 14, the group of animals (9–13 animals) was
euthanized for the direct measurements of Young's modulus of the
blood clots. Thrombi were removed from the dissected IVC and
transported immediately to the next room for mechanical
load-displacement measurements to accurately assess the Young's
modulus of the thrombi. Specifically, the displacement versus
force was measured while a test sample was subjected to
compression. Based on the strain-stress relationship and finite
element modeling of the clot deformation, Young's modulus of the
test sample was estimated. Initially, the system was tested on
rubber cylindrical sample with known elastic properties [38].
The direct ex vivo elasticity measurements were performed using
15–20% strain range. This range approximately corresponds to the
strain level used in ultrasound in vivo studies. In
Figure 12, the mechanical, ex vivo measurements of
Young's modulus are plotted as function of thrombus age.
Figure 12
The ex vivo direct
mechanical measurements of the Young's modulus of the blood clot
during formation and aging of thrombus.
Figures 11
and 12
demonstrate that the in vivo
reconstruction agrees well with the ex vivo mechanical
measurement. The results of direct elasticity estimations and
remote assessment of the clot elasticity indicate that a thrombus
hardens as it matures. Indeed, the Young's modulus of thrombi
increases over time, and a 10-day old thrombus is approximately
3–6 times harder than a 3-day old thrombus.Therefore, the model-based elasticity reconstruction approach is
applicable to an animal model of DVT. Indeed, thrombus elasticity
(Young's modulus) increases with time and can be accurately
assessed and monitored using quantitative model-based
reconstructive elasticity imaging.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The model-based elasticity reconstruction method was developed to
demonstrate the potential of ultrasound-based reconstructive
elasticity imaging. The developed model-based method has several
advantages compared to other elasticity reconstruction approaches.
The model-based elasticity reconstruction requires only axial
component of the strain tensor. The minimization procedure in
model-based reconstruction is relatively efficient and stable
given the small number of unknown scalar parameters derived from
an analytic solution of the forward elastic problem. Finally, the
model-based reconstruction is not highly sensitive to the details
of external loading. The model-based reconstructive elasticity
imaging was applied to differentiate liver hemangioma and to age
deep vein thrombosis. The results of our studies indicate that the
model-based reconstruction approach is applicable in ultrasound in
vivo elasticity imaging and can provide needed information about
biomechanical properties of tissues.
Authors: Xunchang Chen; Marwa J Zohdy; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Matthew O'Donell Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Jonathan Ophir; S Kaisar Alam; Brian S Garra; Faouzi Kallel; Elisa E Konofagou; Thomas Krouskop; Christopher R B Merritt; Raffaella Righetti; Remi Souchon; Seshadri Srinivasan; Tomy Varghese Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 1.314
Authors: Jonathan M Rubin; Hua Xie; Kang Kim; William F Weitzel; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Salavat R Aglyamov; Thomas W Wakefield; Andrew G Urquhart; Matthew O'Donnell Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: S Y Emelianov; X Chen; M O'Donnell; B Knipp; D Myers; T W Wakefield; J M Rubin Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: T W Wakefield; R M Strieter; C A Wilke; A M Kadell; S K Wrobleski; M D Burdick; R Schmidt; S L Kunkel; L J Greenfield Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra Journal: Curr Med Imaging Rev Date: 2011-11
Authors: John J Black; Francois T H Yu; Rick G Schnatz; Xucai Chen; Flordeliza S Villanueva; John J Pacella Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 2.998