Literature DB >> 18256708

A single question reliably identifies physically inactive women in primary care.

Sally B Rose1, C Raina Elley, Beverley A Lawton, Anthony C Dowell.   

Abstract

AIM: To validate a single-item screening question for systematic use in primary health care to identify physically inactive adults, who may benefit from physical activity intervention.
METHODS: The single-item physical activity screening question was administered to 1171 women aged 51-74 years recruited from 10 general practices, followed by a longer validated physical activity questionnaire (the NZPAQ-LF). Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and a Kappa statistic were calculated to assess validity of the screening question.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the single-item question was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73.5-79.7). It had high specificity (81.1%, 95%CI 77.2-84.4), and a high positive predictive value (86.7%, 95%CI 83.8-89.1). The positive likelihood ratio was 4.05 (3.33-4.93), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.29 (0.25-0.33). The Kappa statistic calculated for the single-item screening question when validated against the NZPAQ-LF was 0.56 (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The single-item screening question has good sensitivity, specificity, and concordance with a validated physical activity questionnaire. The question is easy to administer and elicits a simple yes/no response from patients. This validated tool can now be used in practice to identify women who would benefit from physical activity interventions in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18256708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  25 in total

1.  The association of lifetime physical inactivity with bladder and renal cancer risk: A hospital-based case-control analysis.

Authors:  Rikki Cannioto; John Lewis Etter; Lauren Beryl Guterman; Janine M Joseph; Nicholas R Gulati; Kristina L Schmitt; Michael J LaMonte; Ryan Nagy; Albina Minlikeeva; James Brian Szender; Kirsten B Moysich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Patient-reported areas for quality improvement in general practice: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Mariko Carey; Danielle Mazza; Serene Yoong; Alice Grady; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Chronic Recreational Physical Inactivity and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk: Evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

Authors:  Rikki Cannioto; Michael J LaMonte; Harvey A Risch; Chi-Chen Hong; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Kevin H Eng; J Brian Szender; Jenny Chang-Claude; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Ruediger Klapdor; Emily Gower; Albina N Minlikeeva; Gary R Zirpoli; Elisa V Bandera; Andrew Berchuck; Daniel Cramer; Jennifer A Doherty; Robert P Edwards; Brooke L Fridley; Ellen L Goode; Marc T Goodman; Estrid Hogdall; Satoyo Hosono; Allan Jensen; Susan Jordan; Susanne K Kjaer; Keitaro Matsuo; Roberta B Ness; Catherine M Olsen; Sara H Olson; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Malcolm C Pike; Mary Anne Rossing; Elizabeth A Szamreta; Pamela J Thompson; Chiu-Chen Tseng; Robert A Vierkant; Penelope M Webb; Nicolas Wentzensen; Kristine G Wicklund; Stacey J Winham; Anna H Wu; Francesmary Modugno; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Linda E Kelemen; Kirsten B Moysich
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Assessing physical activity in general practice: a disconnect between clinical practice and public health?

Authors:  Tania Winzenberg; Pam Reid; Kelly Shaw
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Touch screen computer health assessment in Australian general practice patients: a cross-sectional study protocol.

Authors:  Sze Lin Yoong; Mariko Leanne Carey; Robert William Sanson-Fisher; Grant Russell; Danielle Mazza; Meredith Makeham; Christine Louise Paul; Kerry Jane Inder; Catherine D'Este
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The Effect of a Physical Activity Program on the Total Number of Primary Care Visits in Inactive Patients: A 15-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maria Giné-Garriga; Carme Martin-Borràs; Anna Puig-Ribera; Carlos Martín-Cantera; Mercè Solà; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Using a single question to assess physical activity in older adults: a reliability and validity study.

Authors:  Dawn P Gill; Gareth R Jones; Guangyong Zou; Mark Speechley
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A cross-sectional survey and latent class analysis of the prevalence and clustering of health risk factors among people attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service.

Authors:  Natasha E Noble; Christine L Paul; Nicole Turner; Stephen V Blunden; Christopher Oldmeadow; Heidi E Turon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  LIFETIME PHYSICAL INACTIVITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH LUNG CANCER RISK AND MORTALITY.

Authors:  Rikki Cannioto; John Lewis Etter; Michael J LaMonte; Andrew D Ray; Janine M Joseph; Emad Al Qassim; Kevin H Eng; Kirsten B Moysich
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2018

10.  Exercise on prescription for women aged 40-74 recruited through primary care: two year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Beverley A Lawton; Sally B Rose; C Raina Elley; Anthony C Dowell; Anna Fenton; Simon A Moyes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.