Literature DB >> 18255046

Causes of primary donor failure in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Lisanne Ham1, Jacqueline van der Wees, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the causes of primary failure of donor Descemet membrane transplants in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
DESIGN: Laboratory and clinical study.
METHODS: From a larger series of eyes that underwent DMEK for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy, 11 transplanted corneas did not clear within the first week after surgery. During a secondary 'Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty' procedure, the first graft was carefully removed and analyzed with light microscopy. For each patient, the surgical video of the initial DMEK procedure was analyzed to determine the cause of transplant failure.
RESULTS: With light microscopy, all but two explanted transplants had a endothelial cell density of 1700 cells/mm2 or higher. Three Descemet grafts may have been positioned upside down and three may have failed due to manipulation. One transplant could not be properly attached onto the recipient posterior stroma because of insufficient air-support in a post-vitrectomy eye. For four eyes, no obvious cause of failure could be determined.
CONCLUSION: Unexpectedly, graft failure after DMEK may not primarily result from tissue damage during implantation and associated endothelial cell loss. Detached grafts may therefore be managed by early reposition. When the graft is attached after surgery but fails to clear, secondary surgical intervention may be postponed, because these corneas may clear spontaneously after several weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18255046     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  9 in total

Review 1.  [DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; F E Kruse
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Graft survival and endothelial outcomes in the new era of endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Comparison of endothelial cell loss and complications following DMEK with the use of three different graft injectors.

Authors:  K Droutsas; A Lazaridis; G D Kymionis; K Chatzistefanou; M M Moschos; C Koutsandrea; W Sekundo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Management of Upside-Down Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Case Series.

Authors:  Ahmed Shalaby Bardan; Mohamed B Goweida; Hesham F El Goweini; Christopher Sc Liu
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Negative impact of dextran in organ culture media for pre-stripped tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome.

Authors:  Alaadin Abdin; Loay Daas; Max Pattmöller; Shady Suffo; Achim Langenbucher; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  [Keratoplasty: laminate or penetrate? Part 2: lamellar keratoplasty].

Authors:  P Maier; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Herpes Simplex Virus Endotheliitis following Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati; Reza Alizadeh; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Influences on rebubble rate in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Keegan B Mechels; Michael D Greenwood; Ramu G Sudhagoni; John P Berdahl
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 9.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Gustavo Vedana; Guadalupe Villarreal; Albert S Jun
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.