Literature DB >> 18254789

Clinical experience of StarClose vascular closure device in patients with first and recurrent femoral punctures.

Edgar Lik-Wui Tay1, Melissa Co, Bee-Choo Tai, Yian Ping Lee, Adrian Low, Yean-Teng Lim, Huay-Cheem Tan, Chi-Hang Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present our clinical experience of StarClose in patients undergoing coronary interventions, including its use in patients after repeated puncture of the same femoral access site.
BACKGROUND: The StarClose is a novel vascular closure device that deploys a small, flexible, circumferential nitinol clip onto the femoral artery surface.
METHODS: In this study, 103 consecutive patients (24% with repeated punctures) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received a StarClose were followed up prospectively. The patients were assessed for vascular complications prior to hospital discharge. Device success, based on time-to-hemostasis, was divided into (1) immediate success: hemostasis achieved immediately after StarClose deployment without the need for adjunctive manual compression, (2) partial success: occurrence of minor oozing after StarClose deployment and hemostasis achieved after <3 minutes of manual compression, and (3) device failure: need for adjunctive manual compression for >3 minutes.
RESULTS: Immediate success, partial success, and device failure rates were 74% (n = 68), 16% (n = 15), and 10% (n = 9), respectively. There were no major complications attributable to the StarClose device. There were 10 (9.7%) cases of minor complications; all were recurrent wound bleeding requiring manual compression in the wards. Among these 10 cases of recurrent bleeding, 5 (50%) had initial device success (immediate success, n = 2, partial success, n = 3) in the catheterization laboratory. The risk for recurrent bleeding was 2.9% after immediate device success and 20.0% after partial device success.
CONCLUSION: Our study found no major complications but a 10% failure rate and a 9.7% rate of minor complications. Close surveillance is important as there is a risk for recurrent bleeding, especially in patients with partial device success as defined in this report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18254789     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  3 in total

1.  StarClose vascular closure device: safety and efficacy of deployment and reaccess in a neurointerventional radiology service.

Authors:  R A McTaggart; D Raghavan; R A Haas; M V Jayaraman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Vascular closure device failure in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Venkatesan D Vidi; Michael E Matheny; Usha S Govindarajulu; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Susan L Robbins; Vikram V Agarwal; Sripal Bangalore; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Safety and efficacy of the StarClose vascular closure system following 8-Fr sheath placement for intra-aortic balloon pump: a single-center analysis of 42 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Guang Chu; Wenyi Yang; Guobing Zhang; Zhi Zhang; Shaowen Liu; Baogui Sun; Fang Wang
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 1.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.