OBJECTIVE: Little research substantiates long-term gains in the treatment of phantom limb pain. This report describes and evaluates an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) treatment with extensive follow-up. DESIGN: A case series of phantom limb pain patients. Setting. In-patient hospitalization and out-patient private practice. PATIENTS: Case series of five patients with phantom limb pain ranging from 1 to 16 years. All patents were on extensive medication regimens prior to EMDR. INTERVENTIONS: Three to 15 sessions of EMDR were used to treat the pain and the psychological ramifications. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were measured for continued use of medications, pain intensity/frequency, psychological trauma, and depression. RESULTS: EMDR resulted in a significant decrease or elimination of phantom pain, reduction in depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms to subclinical levels, and significant reduction or elimination of medications related to the phantom pain and nociceptive pain at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The overview and long-term follow-up indicate that EMDR was successful in the treatment of both the phantom limb pain and the psychological consequences of amputation. The latter include issues of personal loss, grief, self-image, and social adjustment. These results suggest that (1) a significant aspect of phantom limb pain is the physiological memory storage of the nociceptive pain sensations experienced at the time of the event and (2) these memories can be successfully reprocessed. Further research is needed to explore the theoretical and treatment implications of this information-processing approach.
OBJECTIVE: Little research substantiates long-term gains in the treatment of phantom limb pain. This report describes and evaluates an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) treatment with extensive follow-up. DESIGN: A case series of phantom limb painpatients. Setting. In-patient hospitalization and out-patient private practice. PATIENTS: Case series of five patients with phantom limb pain ranging from 1 to 16 years. All patents were on extensive medication regimens prior to EMDR. INTERVENTIONS: Three to 15 sessions of EMDR were used to treat the pain and the psychological ramifications. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were measured for continued use of medications, pain intensity/frequency, psychological trauma, and depression. RESULTS: EMDR resulted in a significant decrease or elimination of phantom pain, reduction in depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms to subclinical levels, and significant reduction or elimination of medications related to the phantom pain and nociceptive pain at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The overview and long-term follow-up indicate that EMDR was successful in the treatment of both the phantom limb pain and the psychological consequences of amputation. The latter include issues of personal loss, grief, self-image, and social adjustment. These results suggest that (1) a significant aspect of phantom limb pain is the physiological memory storage of the nociceptive pain sensations experienced at the time of the event and (2) these memories can be successfully reprocessed. Further research is needed to explore the theoretical and treatment implications of this information-processing approach.
Authors: Carlijn de Roos; A C Veenstra; A de Jongh; M den Hollander-Gijsman; N J A van der Wee; F G Zitman; Y R van Rood Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Gianluca Castelnuovo; Emanuele M Giusti; Gian Mauro Manzoni; Donatella Saviola; Arianna Gatti; Samantha Gabrielli; Marco Lacerenza; Giada Pietrabissa; Roberto Cattivelli; Chiara A M Spatola; Stefania Corti; Margherita Novelli; Valentina Villa; Andrea Cottini; Carlo Lai; Francesco Pagnini; Lorys Castelli; Mario Tavola; Riccardo Torta; Marco Arreghini; Loredana Zanini; Amelia Brunani; Paolo Capodaglio; Guido E D'Aniello; Federica Scarpina; Andrea Brioschi; Lorenzo Priano; Alessandro Mauro; Giuseppe Riva; Claudia Repetto; Camillo Regalia; Enrico Molinari; Paolo Notaro; Stefano Paolucci; Giorgio Sandrini; Susan G Simpson; Brenda Wiederhold; Stefano Tamburin Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-02-19
Authors: Agda M Andreotti; Marcelo C Goiato; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Aldiéris A Pesqueira; Aimée M Guiotti; Humberto Gennari-Filho; Daniela M dos Santos Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2014-12-07
Authors: Sara Carletto; Martina Borghi; Gabriella Bertino; Francesco Oliva; Marco Cavallo; Arne Hofmann; Alessandro Zennaro; Simona Malucchi; Luca Ostacoli Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-04-21