Literature DB >> 18254767

Two-minute skin anesthesia through ultrasound pretreatment and iontophoretic delivery of a topical anesthetic: a feasibility study.

Egilius L H Spierings1, Julie A Brevard, Nathaniel P Katz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pain associated with percutaneous procedures is a significant source of distress in clinical practice, especially in children. Topical anesthetics require 30-60 minutes to provide skin anesthesia; with iontophoresis, they minimally require 10 minutes, and with ultrasound pretreatment, 5 minutes. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of providing skin anesthesia to needle prick with the combination of ultrasound pretreatment and 2-minute low-voltage (1 mA) iontophoresis. We compared it with sham-ultrasound pretreatment and with standard, 10-minute high-voltage (4 mA) iontophoresis.
METHODS: This is a single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers, specifically for the purpose of the study subjected to standardized needle prick. They rated the absolute pain associated with the needle prick on a 10-cm visual analog scale, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "extremely painful."
RESULTS: Of the 31 subjects who consented to the study, 30 were randomized and completed the study. The mean duration of the ultrasound pretreatment was 21.4 seconds (range: 6-85). The absolute pain scores for the ultrasound plus 2-minute low-voltage iontophoresis and the standard, 10-minute high-voltage iontophoresis were not statistically significantly different (0.9 +/- 0.31 vs 0.46 +/- 0.20; P = 0.49). However, they were statistically significantly different from the sham-ultrasound plus 2-minute low-voltage iontophoresis pain score (2.6 +/- 0.55) (P = 0.0001 and 0.0012, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound pretreatment plus 2-minute low-voltage iontophoresis provides better skin anesthesia than sham-ultrasound plus 2-minute low-voltage iontophoresis, and similar to standard, 10-minute high-voltage iontophoresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18254767     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  8 in total

1.  The effect of sonophoresis on topical anesthesia: a pilot project.

Authors:  Joseph L Packer; Barry Krall; Ali Makki; Mahmoud Torabinejad
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends.

Authors:  Baris E Polat; Douglas Hart; Robert Langer; Daniel Blankschtein
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Low-frequency sonophoresis: application to the transdermal delivery of macromolecules and hydrophilic drugs.

Authors:  Baris E Polat; Daniel Blankschtein; Robert Langer
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 4.  An overview of clinical and commercial impact of drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Aaron C Anselmo; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Polymeric nanoparticle system to target activated microglia/macrophages in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Simonetta Papa; Raffaele Ferrari; Massimiliano De Paola; Filippo Rossi; Alessandro Mariani; Ilaria Caron; Eliana Sammali; Marco Peviani; Valentina Dell'Oro; Claudio Colombo; Massimo Morbidelli; Gianluigi Forloni; Giuseppe Perale; Davide Moscatelli; Pietro Veglianese
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  New delivery systems for local anaesthetics-part 2.

Authors:  Edward A Shipton
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-08

7.  Development of Lidocaine-Loaded Dissolving Microneedle for Rapid and Efficient Local Anesthesia.

Authors:  Huisuk Yang; Geonwoo Kang; Mingyu Jang; Daniel Junmin Um; Jiwoo Shin; Hyeonjun Kim; Jintae Hong; Hyunji Jung; Hyemyoung Ahn; Seongdae Gong; Chisong Lee; Ui-Won Jung; Hyungil Jung
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 8.  Potential and problems in ultrasound-responsive drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Ying-Zheng Zhao; Li-Na Du; Cui-Tao Lu; Yi-Guang Jin; Shu-Ping Ge
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-04-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.