Jordan F Karp1, Thomas Rudy, Debra K Weiner. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. karpjf@upmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Differential item functioning (DIF) assesses the consistency of items on a metric across clinical samples in relation to the attribute being measured. We hypothesized that in older adults with persistent pain, items of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) would evidence DIF based on presence or intensity of pain. DESIGN: Unidimensionality was determined by factor and item analyses. DIF was tested using Rasch Modeling. We then evaluated the psychometric properties of a revised GDS (GDS-PAIN), comprised of items that did not evidence DIF. PATIENT AND SETTINGS: A total of 677 community dwelling older adults (age 65-91) participating in observational or treatment studies of low back or knee pain who endorsed at least moderate pain for at least 3 months. A total of 201 pain-free controls were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Ten of the 30 items displayed significant DIF. These items were: 1) dropping activities and interests; 2) bothered by persistent thoughts; 3) often get fidgety and restless; 4) prefer to stay home; 5) do not feel full of energy; 6) do not enjoy getting up in the morning; 7) mind is not as clear as it was, 8) feel life is empty; 9) feel more problems with memory; and 10) do not find life very exciting. The modified GDS-PAIN scale did not adversely affect the psychometric properties of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the GDS is affected by pain. When unstable items are removed, the revised GDS (GDS-PAIN) appears to be psychometrically stable and maintains both internal consistency and similar correlation values with a measure of pain as the original scale.
OBJECTIVE: Differential item functioning (DIF) assesses the consistency of items on a metric across clinical samples in relation to the attribute being measured. We hypothesized that in older adults with persistent pain, items of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) would evidence DIF based on presence or intensity of pain. DESIGN: Unidimensionality was determined by factor and item analyses. DIF was tested using Rasch Modeling. We then evaluated the psychometric properties of a revised GDS (GDS-PAIN), comprised of items that did not evidence DIF. PATIENT AND SETTINGS: A total of 677 community dwelling older adults (age 65-91) participating in observational or treatment studies of low back or knee pain who endorsed at least moderate pain for at least 3 months. A total of 201 pain-free controls were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Ten of the 30 items displayed significant DIF. These items were: 1) dropping activities and interests; 2) bothered by persistent thoughts; 3) often get fidgety and restless; 4) prefer to stay home; 5) do not feel full of energy; 6) do not enjoy getting up in the morning; 7) mind is not as clear as it was, 8) feel life is empty; 9) feel more problems with memory; and 10) do not find life very exciting. The modified GDS-PAIN scale did not adversely affect the psychometric properties of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the GDS is affected by pain. When unstable items are removed, the revised GDS (GDS-PAIN) appears to be psychometrically stable and maintains both internal consistency and similar correlation values with a measure of pain as the original scale.
Authors: M Carrington Reid; Zhenchao Guo; Virginia R Towle; Robert D Kerns; John Concato Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Debra K Weiner; Thomas E Rudy; Ronald M Glick; J Robert Boston; Susan J Lieber; Lisa A Morrow; Stephen Taylor Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Cyrus M Kosar; Patricia A Tabloski; Thomas G Travison; Richard N Jones; Eva M Schmitt; Margaret R Puelle; Jennifer B Inloes; Jane S Saczynski; Edward R Marcantonio; David Meagher; M Carrington Reid; Sharon K Inouye Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Alexander W Thompson; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays; Wayne J Katon; Rebecca Rausch; Natalie Diaz; Erin L Jacob; Stefanie D Vassar; Barbara G Vickrey Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: Neilly Buckalew; Marc W Haut; Howard Aizenstein; Lisa Morrow; Subashan Perera; Hiroto Kuwabara; Debra K Weiner Journal: Pain Med Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: M W Williams; A M Kueider; N O Dmitrieva; J J Manly; C F Pieper; S P Verney; L E Gibbons Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.485