Literature DB >> 18254676

Similar cost for elective open and endovascular AAA repair in a population-based setting.

Kevin Mani1, Martin Björck, Jonas Lundkvist, Anders Wanhainen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare cost differences between elective open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a population-based setting.
METHODS: Clinical data and hospital-related costs (pre-, peri-, and postoperative) were analyzed for 109 consecutive AAA procedures (98 men; mean age 73 years, range 48-95; mean aneurysm diameter 61 mm, range 42-120) performed from 2001 to 2005 (58 OR, 51 EVAR) in our primary catchment area. Data were obtained through case records and hospital accounting systems. Nonparametric bootstrap was used for cost comparison.
RESULTS: EVAR patients were older (76 versus 70 years, p<0.001) and had more comorbidities (ASA class 2.6 versus 2.3, p = 0.025). OR patients more often had anatomically complex aneurysms (52% versus 14%, p<0.001). Comparison of data with diagnosis-based reimbursement levels nationally and internationally indicated adequate cost level in the study. No difference was observed in total cost between OR and EVAR (euro29,786 versus euro26,382; p = 0.336). Preoperative cost was lower for OR compared to EVAR (euro661 versus euro1494, p = 0.002). OR patients had higher cost of intensive care [36% (euro8921) of perioperative cost versus 7% (euro1460), p = 0.001], while EVAR had higher implant cost [36% (euro7468) versus 2% (euro448), p<0.001]. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years (range 0.5-5.4). Mean postoperative cost was similar (OR euro4613 versus EVAR euro4403, p = 0.209; 16% and 17% of total cost, respectively). Postoperative cost after OR was high early on, with lower cost thereafter. Postoperative cost after EVAR was more homogeneously distributed, leveling off at euro500 to euro1000 annually over 5 years.
CONCLUSION: In a population-based setting, total cost was similar for OR and EVAR. There were, however, important differences in patient characteristics and cost structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18254676     DOI: 10.1583/07-2258.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of costs of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Il Min; Seung-Kee Min; Sanghyun Ahn; Suh Min Kim; Daedo Park; Taejin Park; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park; Jongwon Ha; Sang Joon Kim; In Mok Jung
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarians--beyond limits?

Authors:  Marguerite F Bouwmeester; Steven M M van Sterkenburg; Clark J Zeebregts; Willem R de Vries; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

3.  Should endovascular repair be reimbursed for low risk abdominal aortic aneurysm patients? Evidence from ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Jean-Eric Tarride; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; James M Bowen; Hamid Reza Nakhai-Pour; Daria O'Reilly; Feng Xie; Teresa Novick; Robert Hopkins; Ron Goeree
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2011-06-24

4.  Baseline characteristics, survival and direct costs associated to treatment of gastric cancer patients at the National Oncology Institute of Panama from 2012 to 2015: a hospital-based observational study.

Authors:  Franz Castro; David Shahal; Musharaf Tarajia; Ilais Moreno Velásquez; Maribel Tribaldos Causadias; Víctor Herrera; Beatriz Gómez; Moisés Cukier; Jorge Motta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.

Authors:  S G Thompson; H A Ashton; L Gao; R A P Scott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.