Literature DB >> 18253904

Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain?

A J Eckardt1, C Swales, K Bhattacharya, W Y Wassef, N P Phelan, S Zubair, N Martins, S Patel, B Moquin, N Anwar, K Leung, J M Levey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy is important for quality assurance; it may be affected by various factors, including patient characteristics, physician training level, and procedural or organizational features. We aimed to analyze how these factors influenced patient satisfaction and pain in an outpatient training setting.
METHODS: Consecutive patients for open access colonoscopy (OAC) were enrolled in a prospective, single-blinded, controlled study. Primary and secondary outcomes were satisfaction and pain scores with and without trainee participation. A multivariate analysis was designed to achieve an 80 % power with an alpha value of 0.05.
RESULTS: 368 patients were enrolled. Satisfaction with the procedure was high (mean score 1.36; 1 = best to 5 = worst). In the multivariate analysis only waiting time in the endoscopy suite was significantly associated with lower satisfaction scores ( P = 0.024). Satisfaction was unaffected by patient factors (gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists' [ASA] score, anxiety, etc). Higher pain scores were associated with higher anxiety levels ( P = 0.02), female gender ( P = 0.02), longer procedure ( P< 0.001), and lower sedation levels ( P = 0.001); trainee involvement (49 % of procedures) did not adversely affect satisfaction or pain scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with OAC using sedation appears to depend primarily on organizational factors (waiting time beforehand). In contrast, pain is associated with patient characteristics (female gender, anxiety) and procedural factors (lower sedation, longer procedure). Trainee participation did not affect satisfaction or pain scores, a finding which may help to reassure patients undergoing OAC with trainee participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18253904     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  16 in total

1.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Kim Kenton; Nancy K Janz; Yvonne Hsu; Keisha Y Dyer; W Jerod Greer; Amanda White; Susie Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Nancy Janz; Kim Kenton; Yvonne Hsu; W Jerod Greer; Keisha Dyer; Amanda White; Susan Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  A prospective audit of patient experiences in colonoscopy using the Global Rating Scale: a cohort of 1,187 patients.

Authors:  Vincent de Jonge; Jerome Sint Nicolaas; Eoin A Lalor; Clarence K Wong; Brennan Walters; Anand Bala; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam; Sander Jo Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences among Black and Latino Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Sumedha V Chablani; Noah Cohen; Drusilla White; Steven H Itzkowitz; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-10

6.  Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Nikita Hickey; Brad Evans; Muna Lougheed; Curtis Marcoux; Jerry McGrath; Darrell Boone; Meghan O'Leary; Chris Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Assessment of participant satisfaction with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in South Korea.

Authors:  Hoo-Yeon Lee; Sun Mi Lim; Mi Ah Han; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Son Choi; Myung-Il Hahm; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Clinical impact of endoscopy position detecting unit (UPD-3) for a non-sedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Junichi Uematsu; Shin Kono; Sho Suzuki; Takemasa Sato; Naoko Yagi; Yuichiro Tsuji; Kenji Yagi; Chika Kusano; Takuji Gotoda; Takashi Kawai; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Patient comfort and quality in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vivian E Ekkelenkamp; Kevin Dowler; Roland M Valori; Paul Dunckley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Russell Loftus; Zoann Nugent; Lesley A Graff; Frederick Schumacher; Charles N Bernstein; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.