BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine the sensitivity of 16-row multi-detector computed tomography urography (CTU) axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types for upper tract urothelial neoplasm detection. METHODS: Twenty-one CTU examinations were identified that contained one or more pathology-proven upper tract urothelial neoplasms during our study period. Two readers independently reviewed 1.25 and 2.5 mm axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted excretory phase CTU images. Each reader then documented the location and appearance of lesions suspicious for upper tract urothelial neoplasm. These results were correlated with relevant endoscopic/surgical procedure notes as well as pathology results. RESULTS: Reader #1 detected 72%, 63%, 75%, and 72% of the known 32 upper tract urothelial neoplasms using 1.25 mm axial, 2.5 mm axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types, respectively. Reader #2 detected 72% of the known neoplasms using each of the four image-types. No significant difference in sensitivity between image-types was identified. After combining the results for all four image-types, readers #1 and #2 had overall sensitivities of 94% and 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types have similar sensitivities for the detection of upper tract urothelial neoplasm in 16-row multi-detector CTU. Reviewing multiple image-types increases the sensitivity of urothelial lesion detection.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine the sensitivity of 16-row multi-detector computed tomography urography (CTU) axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types for upper tract urothelial neoplasm detection. METHODS: Twenty-one CTU examinations were identified that contained one or more pathology-proven upper tract urothelial neoplasms during our study period. Two readers independently reviewed 1.25 and 2.5 mm axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted excretory phase CTU images. Each reader then documented the location and appearance of lesions suspicious for upper tract urothelial neoplasm. These results were correlated with relevant endoscopic/surgical procedure notes as well as pathology results. RESULTS: Reader #1 detected 72%, 63%, 75%, and 72% of the known 32 upper tract urothelial neoplasms using 1.25 mm axial, 2.5 mm axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types, respectively. Reader #2 detected 72% of the known neoplasms using each of the four image-types. No significant difference in sensitivity between image-types was identified. After combining the results for all four image-types, readers #1 and #2 had overall sensitivities of 94% and 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Axial, coronal reformatted, and curved-planar reformatted image-types have similar sensitivities for the detection of upper tract urothelial neoplasm in 16-row multi-detector CTU. Reviewing multiple image-types increases the sensitivity of urothelial lesion detection.
Authors: Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Eva M Coppenrath; Thomas Meindl; Christoph Degenhart; Michael K Scherr; Christian G Stief; Maximilian F Reiser; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S Seifert; U G Mueller-Lisse; C Degenhart; K Jundt; F Mourched; C G Stief; M F Reiser; U L Mueller-Lisse Journal: Radiologe Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 0.635