Literature DB >> 18253473

Comparison of envelope-related genes in unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria.

Yu Yang1, Song Qin, Fangqing Zhao, Xiaoyuan Chi, Xiaowen Zhang.   

Abstract

To elucidate the evolution of cyanobacterial envelopes and the relation between gene content and environmental adaptation, cell envelope structures and components of unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria were analyzed in comparative genomics. Hundreds of envelope biogenesis genes were divided into 5 major groups and annotated according to their conserved domains and phylogenetic profiles. Compared to unicellular species, the gene numbers of filamentous cyanobacteria expanded due to genome enlargement effect, but only few gene families amplified disproportionately, such as those encoding waaG and glycosyl transferase 2. Comparison of envelope genes among various species suggested that the significant variance of certain cyanobacterial envelope biogenesis genes should be the response to their environmental adaptation, which might be also related to the emergence of filamentous shapes with some new functions.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18253473      PMCID: PMC2211374          DOI: 10.1155/2007/25751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics        ISSN: 1531-6912


1. INTRODUCTION

As the oldest oxygenic phototrophs on the earth, cyanobacteria originated 2.8∼3.5 billion years ago [1]. Cyanobacteria are usually considered gram negative in traditional classification of prokaryotic envelopes [2], for the existence of outer membrane and lack of teichoic acid in cell walls. However, many unusual features exist in their envelopes. Cyanobacteria have a thick (15∼35 nm or more) and high cross-linking peptidoglycan layer, similar to gram-positive bacteria [3]. Some rare composition of gram-negative walls, such as carotenoid [4] and -hydroxypalmitic acid [5], has been found from in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of cyanobacteria. The archaic organisms contain cellulose indicative of vascular plants [6]. Phylum cyanobacteria has been well diverged in evolution. Some cyanobacteria have been evolved in a multicellular filamentous form, while others remained unicellular. Filamentous cyanobacteria are the oldest known multicellular organisms [7], and the divergence of cyanobacteria is a landmark in biological evolution. Transition from unicellular to filamentous cyanobacteria was a significant evolutionary event, as the organisms were equipped with an advantageous interior nutrition system able to interact with ambient factors [8]. The rise of genomics greatly promoted biological research, of which comparative genomics became an effective tool to explore different species. So far, 25 cyanobacterial genomes, both unicellular and filamentous, have been sequenced, ranging from 1.6 to 9.1 Mb [9]. However, a large difference exists in cell envelope between unicellular and filamentous species. At present, few comparative analyses have been made concerning the structure and function of cell envelopes of both. Therefore, to understand the diversity in cyanobacterial envelope, comparative genomic analysis is conducted in this paper by comparing envelope biogenetic genes between unicellular and filamentous species. As each of them occupies own ecological niche, cyanobacterial genome, the envelope structure, and environment adaptability were associated for inferring multicellular selection of cyanobacteria.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. The information management system

At the time of this study, 25 sequenced cyanobacterial genomes, including 21 unicellular and 4 filamentous were available for public online access into the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system provided by Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (http://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/pub/main.cgi) [10]. Unicellular Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, and filamentous Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 (also called Nostoc sp. PCC 7120) were chosen for this research. In each species, over 60% of genes have been already included into the database of Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) [11] based on orthology concept [12]. In a COG under the directory of “Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis,” gene sequences in FASTA amino acid format were selected, exported, and downloaded in November, 2006 (as IMG version often updates, the data may change).

2.2. Gene retrieval and annotation

Quite a number of genes directly available online have only accession or gene ID, but complete description. So it was hard to know their roles in cyanobacterial envelope biogenesis. What we tried to solve the problem was to online-use software InterProScan from the EMBL of European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/InterProScan) [13]. Unfortunately, this action alone could not provide enough information, such as the family to which the gene belongs and the impact by envelope biogenesis. Therefore, two online tools in NCBI, protein-protein BLAST (blastp), (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) [14] and reverse position specific BLAST (RPS-BLAST) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) [15], were also used as assistants. Putative conserved domains of the genes (without detailed description) were detected; and the genes were aligned up with other known genes, commonly with score > 80 bits and expect < 1e-10 at least. Finally, present references to the roles of particular domains or gene families involved in bacterial envelope biogenesis were combined; the unclear genes would be retrieved and annotated.

2.3. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

The sequences with similar domains were input and completely aligned using ClustalX 1.8. The produced files with “*.aln” extension were opened by BioEdit at the option of “Graphic View.” The same or similar residues were highlighted in black or dark shade. In this paper, only the most conserved area of gene sequences is shown in figures. In addition to Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, 15 FAS1-containing genes from other cyanobacteria, archaebacteria, eubacteria, yeast, filamentous fungi, and high plants were gained from NCBI. Sequence alignments of genes predicted for the same families were used as an input file for MEGA3 program [16]. Phylogenetic tree was built via the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method in evaluation with 1000 rounds of bootstrapping test [17, 18].

3. RESULTS

One hundred envelope biogenesis genes were obtained from Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, 186 from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, 266 from Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, and 294 from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, which are shown in the “total” column in Table 1. Known constituents of cyanobacterial cell walls, including peptidoglycan, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), exopolysaccharide (EPS), outer membrane protein, and so on, were respectively synthesized under the control of different genes. Thus we might as well divide above 846 envelope biogenesis genes into 5 major types: peptidoglycan biosynthesis-related (PBR) genes, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis-related (LBR) genes, exopolysaccharide biosynthesis-related (EBR) genes, outer membrane proteins (OMP) coding genes, and other unknown (OU) genes. The OU ones were loaded from the COG “Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis;” but not enough information was available to annotate them using the methods mentioned in the section “Gene retrieval and annotation.”
Table 1

Absolute and relative numbers of envelope related genes in four cyanobacteria. PBR, LBR, EBR, OMP, and OU represent peptidoglycan biosynthesis-related, lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis-related, exopolysaccharide biosynthesis-related, outer membrane proteins coding, and other unknown genes, respectively. The data in the brackets were the percentage of each group within the total envelope-related genes.

SpeciesTotalPBRLBREBROMPOU
Prochlorococcus marinus MED410029 (29.0%)40 (40.0%)14 (15.0%)16 (15.0%)2 (2.0%)
Synechocystis sp. PCC 680318637 (19.9%)73 (39.2%)28 (15.1%)40 (21.5%)8 (4.3%)
Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS10126647 (17.7%)90 (33.1%)48 (18. 0%)63 (23.7%)18 (6.8%)
Anabaena sp. PCC 712029448 (16.3%)113 (38.4%)61 (20.7%)60 (20.4%)12 (4.1%)
Table 1 shows the absolute and relative amounts of classified genes from unicellular and filamentous species. The appearance of filament naturally resulted in the enlargement of genome sizes and the addition of gene numbers; however, the percentage of each type of “total” varied, too. Therefore, the percentage of EBR increased in filamentous species (EBR percentage of Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 was 18.0% and 21.2% respectively, compared with 15.0% of Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 and 15.1% of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803). The percentage of other types changed simultaneously, which were discussed in detail in Section 4.

3.1. Percentage variation of peptidoglycan biosynthesis-related (PBR) genes

Being an important component of cyanobacterial envelope, peptidoglycan forms a covalently closed and net-like layer, for protecting cells against detrimental environmental influences, maintaining a high internal osmotic pressure, and serving as a barrier to transenvelope transport sometimes [19]. As the amount of envelope biogenesis gene from Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 to Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 increased, this increase was exclusively reflected on one gene family, which encodes class A high-molecular-weight penicillin binding proteins [20]. However, the percentage of PBR decreased instead. In filamentous cyanobacteria, envelope components (besides peptidoglycan) and structures could also protect the cells, such as exopolysaccharide and filamentous sheaths; so relatively fewer peptidoglycan genes were expressed.

3.2. Uneven increase of LBR genes in filamentous cyanobacteria

LPS also has a function of the protection, so the percentage of LBR genes of “total” decreased from unicellular to filamentous cyanobacteria, which is like PBR genes. This course is clearly expressed among Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, and Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101. However, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 did not obey the “trend.” It expressed relatively more LBR genes than that of Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, which is probable due to differentiation of some cells into heterocysts, forming special N2-fixing cells within O2-producing filamentous cyanobacteria [20, 21]. For nitrogen fixing, the heterocysts need extracellular LPS layers to protect oxygen invasion [22]. In terms of absolute amounts, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 had most of the LBR genes. Interesting is that most increased genes had the common conserved domain waaG (formerly RfaG). There were 43 waaG-containing genes found in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 (while only 5 in Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, 17 in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, and 24 in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101). The 43 genes and their multiple alignments in similar domain were shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, about 20 residues out of the 43 sequences were in common (black shading areas). These residues may have formed typical spatial structures that could be defined as active sites of waaG domain.
Table 2

waaG homologous genes in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Information of the 43 genes was provided.

NCBI accessionIMG accessionLocus TagProductPosition in Genome
NP_4842034210510Alr0159Alr0159 protein163382–164575
NP_4842044210520All0160All0160 protein164558–165712
NP_4846264214800Alr0582Alr0582 protein676349–677545
NP_4846284214820Alr0584Alr0584 protein679928–681130
NP_4849624218190All0919All0919 protein1063224–1064513
NP_4850434219010Alr1000Alr1000 protein1171949–1173031
NP_4851604220180Alr1117Alr1117 protein1308038–1309267
NP_4853884222480All1345All1345 protein1596626–1597858
NP_4857084225730Alr1668Alr1668 protein1990621–1991904
NP_4860774229490All2037All2037 protein2435914–2437014
NP_4863054231820SqdXSulfolipid sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol biosynthesis protein2725143–2726279
NP_4863314232080All2291Glycosyltransferase2760187–2761173
NP_4863324232090All2292All2292 protein2761170–2762348
NP_4865474234260All2507All2507 protein3008236–3009423
NP_4865894234680All2549All2549 protein3051362–3052363
NP_4867604236410All2720All2720 protein3315625–3316713
NP_4868724237530Alr2832Alr2832 protein3448705–3449793
NP_4868794237600Alr2839Glycosyltransferase3459432–3460577
NP_4869044237850Alr2864Alr2864 protein3488401–3489579
NP_4869074237880Alr2867Alr2867 protein3491419–3492636
NP_4870974239800Alr3057Alr3057 protein3703378–3704592
NP_4870984239810Alr3058Alr3058 protein3704628–3705854
NP_4871044239870Alr3064Alr3064 protein3712759–3714171
NP_4874654243510Alr3425Alr3425 protein4133859–4135025
NP_4877384246270HepBHeterocyst envelope polysaccharide synthesis protein4465828–4466997
NP_4877394246280Alr3699Alr3699 protein4467059–4468207
NP_4882084251030Alr4168Alr4168 protein5015231–5016502
NP_4882184251140Alr4178Alr4178 protein5025948–5027096
NP_4884634253590All4423All4423 protein5300887–5302026
NP_4884664253620All4426All4426 protein5304172–5305425
NP_4884764253720All4436All4436 protein5320348–5321526
NP_4885344254300Alr4494Mannosyltransferase5380744–5381811
NP_4892344261400All5194Glycosyltransferase6192395–6193555
NP_4892354261410All5195Glycosyltransferase6193736–6194992
NP_4892414261470Alr5201Glycosyltransferase6201983–6203275
NP_4892424261480Alr5202Glycosyltransferase6203285–6204574
NP_4892634261690Alr5223Glycosyltransferase6236642–6237991
NP_4892754261810Alr5235Alr5235 protein6247505–6248551
NP_4892774261830Alr5237Alr5237 protein6249905–6251158
NP_4892784261840Alr5238Glycosyltransferase6251167–6252315
NP_4892794261850Alr5239Alr5239 protein6252417–6253586
NP_4893474262550Alr5307Alr5307 protein6328387–6329490
NP_4893814262900All5341All5341 protein6373814–6375079
Figure 1

Multiple sequence alignments of the 43 waaG homologous genes in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Only most conserved areas were shown. The number following the genus name was the gene accession in IMG database. NCBI accessions and other information of genes were provided in Table .

The waa family includes many members, such as waaP, waaY, waaA, waaT, waaO, waaQ, waaA, and waaC, and helps synthesize the LPS core oligosaccharide. At present, we only knew that the waaG product is a glucosyltransferase, and its mutation can truncated LPS at the phosphorylation sites and destabilized the outer membrane [23]. Probably, waaG can provide a selective advantage to Anabaena sp. PCC 7120.

3.3. Analysis of EBR

During the progress from unicellular to filamentous cyanobacteria, the percentage of EBR genes increased clearly but unevenly in some particular genes. Most extra genes of filamentous species belonged to the family encoding glycosyl transferase 2 that involved in many metabolic processes, mainly in the cellulose biosynthesis [24]. The common conserved domain Glycos_transf_2 was detected for 36 times in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, and 27 in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, as shown in Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 2, whereas it was only 8 times in Prochlorococcus marinus MED4 and 14 times in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. It is believed that certain member in the family glycosyl transferase 2 was a key enzyme synthesizing cellulose in filamentous cyanobacteria.
Table 3

Genes encoding GT2 domain in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120. Information of the 36 genes was provided.

NCBI AccessionIMG AccessionLocus TagProductPosition in Genome
NP_4840864209330all0042All0042 protein44511–45458
NP_4841184209650alr0074Alr0074 protein78171–79187
NP_4841874210350all0143All0143 protein148503–149681
NP_4848194216740alr0776Alr0776 protein899704–900894
NP_4849574218140all0914All0914 protein1057871–1058884
NP_4849584218150all0915All0915 protein1058947–1059852
NP_4857774226430all1737All1737 protein2088106–2089074
NP_4858024226680all1762All1762 protein2117622–2118518
NP_4858064226720all1766All1766 protein2121006–2122007
NP_4858074226730all1767All1767 protein2122000–2123007
NP_4859264227930all1886All1886 protein2252568–2253362
NP_4863284232050all2288Glucosyltransferase2756810–2757841
NP_4863294232060all2289Glucosyltransferase2757927–2758916
NP_4864484233260alr2408Alr2408 protein2888194–2888949
NP_4868684237490alr2828Alr2828 protein3444428–3445441
NP_4868764237570alr2836Putative glycosyl transferase3456248–3457216
NP_4868774237580alr2837Glycosyltransferase3457336–3458310
NP_4868804237610alr2840Glycosyltransferase3460577–3461524
NP_4869064237870alr2866Glycosyltransferase3490561–3491400
NP_4871034239860alr3063Alr3063 protein3711770–3712762
NP_4871094239920alr3069Alr3069 protein3718782–3719963
NP_4871104239930alr3070Alr3070 protein3719986–3720942
NP_4871114239940alr3071Alr3071 protein3720982–3721938
NP_4871134239960alr3073Alr3073 protein3723391–3724365
NP_4872164241000alr3176Alr3176 protein3844812–3845753
NP_4872174241010alr3177Alr3177 protein3845774–3846715
NP_4874204243050alr3380Dolichol-phosphate mannosyltransferase4091498–4092511
NP_4884714253670all4431Glycosyl transferase5310064–5311017
NP_4885324254280alr4492Alr4492 protein5378788–5379816
NP_4888974257980all4857All4857 protein5785088–5786275
NP_4889734258750all4933All4933 protein5886142–5887548
NP_4891424260480all5102All5102 protein6079688–6080410
NP_4891584260640all5118All5118 protein6114366–6115355
NP_4892804261860alr5240Glycosyltransferase6253630–6254397
NP_4893824262910all5342All5342 protein6375223–6376452
NP_4893834262920all5343All5343 protein6376587–6377849
Table 4

Genes encoding GT2 domain in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101. Information of the 27 genes was provided.

NCBI accessionIMG accessionLocus TagProductPosition in Genome
YP_720085636810880Tery_0115Glycosyl transferase, family 2155085–157763
YP_720116636811045Tery_0148Glycosyl transferase, family 2217777–218829
YP_720694636814360Tery_0804Glycosyl transferase, family 21279953–1280891
YP_720758636814755Tery_0883Glycosyl transferase, family 21403156–1404088
YP_720935636815825Tery_1097Glycosyl transferase, family 21725763–1726743
YP_721031636816345Tery_1201Glycosyl transferase, family 21875929–1876612
YP_721128636817045Tery_1340Glycosyl transferase, family 22040749–2041705
YP_721156636817205Tery_1372Glycosyl transferase, family 22104828–2106021
YP_721969636821740Tery_2268Glycosyl transferase, family 23529656–3534458
YP_722405636824155Tery_2749Glycosyl transferase, family 24257314–4258822
YP_722496636824655Tery_2849Glycosyl transferase, family 24430305–4432779
YP_722503636824690Tery_2856Glycosyl transferase, family 24447185–4448186
YP_722586636825160Tery_2950Glycosyl transferase, family 24584744–4585874
YP_722664636825630Tery_3040Glycosyl transferase, family 24692416–4693294
YP_722816636826565Tery_3225Glycosyl transferase, family 24937986–4938924
YP_722946636827300Tery_3371Glycosyl transferase, family 25168831–5170021
YP_722999636827610Tery_3433Glycosyl transferase, family 25251339–5252268
YP_723000636827615Tery_3434Glycosyl transferase, family 25252486–5253415
YP_723155636828495Tery_3609Glycosyl transferase, family 25550523–5551482
YP_723304636829395Tery_3784Dolichyl-phosphate beta-D-mannosyltransferase5816905–5817705
YP_723576636830965Tery_4095Glycosyl transferase, family 26315001–6316008
YP_723603636831105Tery_4122Glycosyl transferase, family 26360766–6361701
YP_723606636831120Tery_4125Glycosyl transferase, family 26363768–6364736
YP_723897636832695Tery_4437Glycosyl transferase, family 26839236–6842421
YP_724037636833455Tery_4588Glycosyl transferase, family 27057924–7058847
YP_724197636834370Tery_4771Glycosyl transferase, family 27329873–7332980
YP_724341636835285Tery_4954Glycosyl transferase, family 27547130–7548305
Figure 2

Multiple sequence alignments of homologous genes encoding glycosyl transferase 2 (GT2) domains in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 (27 genes) and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 (36 genes). Only most conserved areas were shown. The number following the genus name was the gene accession in IMG database. NCBI accession and other information of genes were provided in Tables 3 and 4.

Fasciclin-like (FAS1) family has been identified as hemicellulose synthase in fungi and high plants [25], and it was involved in the secondary wall biosynthesis [26]. Homologues of this conserved domain, closely relative to the formation of filaments and extracellular polysaccharides, has been found in archaebacteria, eubacteria, actinomycetes, yeast, filamentous fungi, and vascular plants. It was found that 2 genes in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS-101 and 6 in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 contained the domain. Representative FAS1-containing genes were found from NCBI, including Synechococcus, Crocosphaera, Nostoc, Methanosarcina, Dehalococcoides, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Flavobacteria, Physcomitrella, Streptomyces, Chaetomium, Magnaapothe, Arabidopsis, Gossypium, and Zea, as shown in Table 5. Phylogenetic tree of all 23 FAS1-containing genes in many species was constructed (See Figure 3). It is clear that genes in Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 were distant from other cyanobacteria (Synechocystis, Synechococcus, Crocosphaera, and Nostoc); and all the cyanobacterial genes were separated from fungi and plants. The FAS1-containing genes were paralogous in the Phylum Cyanobacteria.
Table 5

FAS1-containing genes from Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, and other 15 species.

NCBI AccessionIMG AccessionGeneSpecies
NP_4853634222220Alr1320 Alr1320 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
NP_4858594227250Alr1819 Alr1819 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
NP_4878374247260All3797 All3797 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
NP_4886874255850All4647 All4647 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
NP_4889344258350All4894 All4894 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
NP_4893044262100All5264 All5264 protein Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
YP_722947636827305Tery_3372 beta-Ig-H3/fasciclin Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101
YP_722948636827310Tery_3373 beta-Ig-H3/fasciclin Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101
AAF02137Unknown protein Arabidopsis thaliana
CAF32145Fasciclin I family protein, putative Aspergillus fumigatus
EAQ86204Hypothetical protein CHGG_07457 Chaetomium globosum CBS 148.51
EAM48409Beta-Ig-H3/fasciclin Crocosphaera watsonii WH 8501
AAW46332Hypothetical protein CNK01730 Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans JEC21
CAI83309.1Fasciclin domain protein Dehalococcoides sp. CBDB1
EAS19928Putative cell adhesion protein, fasciclin domain Flavobacteria bacterium BBFL7
AAO92753Arabinogalactan protein Gossypium hirsutum
BAC65875Putative membrane-associated or secreted protein Magnaporthe grisea
AAM05399Hypothetical protein MA_1996 Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A
ZP_00108174COG2335 Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102
CAH58718Fasciclin-like protein precursor Physcomitrella patens
CAA20163Putative secreted protein Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)
AAB62187Putative secreted protein MPB70 Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002
AAC49869Endosperm specific protein Zea mays
Figure 3

The phylogenetic tree of genes containing FAS1 domain in 17 species. Besides Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, other 15 species were from cyanobacteria, archaebacteria, eubacteria, actinomycetes, yeast, filamentous fungi, and vascular plants. To keep the figure clear and direct, the species were written in their genus name for short. The detailed information was described in Section 3 and Table .

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. General descriptions of 5 types of genes

In Table 1, remarkable changes could be seen from top to bottom lines, especially in columns of PBR, EBR, and OMP, which should be easily understood: to adopt better external environment and improve own nutrition status, cyanobacterial envelopes have to be modified. Adding outer membrane proteins could be a choice, as happened in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. From unicellular to filamentous cyanobacteria, the number of envelope biogenesis gene has increased. However, the increase was uneven, and gene duplication focused on in very few families. It is shown that in the evolution, only few families of genes expressed excessively, and they could be involved in generating novel structures and functions.

4.2. Role of waaG in filamentous cyanobacterial regulation

LPS is a characteristic component of gram-negative bacteria, which shows architecture of 3 covalently linked domains, namely hydrophobic lipid A, core oligosaccharide, and hydrophilic O-antigen [27]. In structural feature, the region of phosphorylated core oligosaccharide can be subdivided into inner and outer cores [28]. During LPS biosynthesis, waaG produces transferases, a glucosyl group from D-glucose I (Glc I) I to L-glycero-D-manno-heptose II (Hep II). The mutation of waaG destabilizes the LPS layer by interfering with core phosphorylation [23]; and the stability of LPS layer is necessary to the stabilization of heterocysts' external layers [22]. Unlike marine filamentous Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 usually lives in freshwater or wetland, which is considered as a less stable environment than marine ecosystem, with drastic changes of temperature and light, abundant but inconstant nutrient resources and more potential hazards. Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 is also able to produce heterocysts to fix N2 and actively adapt environment, making itself more mutable than in the ocean environment. Over-expression of waaG homologous genes would help stabilize the heterocysts, and improve the N2-fixing in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120.

4.3. Relation between EBR and cyanobacterial evolution

Cyanobacterial filaments were made up of mainly diverse polysaccharide molecules, containing cellulose and matrix polysaccharide. Most of the genes are from the glycosyl transferase 2 (GT2) family. In model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, over 10 members of the family catalyze glucan-chain elongation in cellulose, and they belong to the group of genes encoding catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase (CESA) [29]. Since cellulose and other EPS were also the main components of cyanobacterial filamentous sheath, the GT2 family may play a vital role in the formation of filaments. In the meanwhile, these results could further prove that the cellulose produced by cyanobacteria is, at least one of, the earliest origins of the most abundant biopolymer on the earth today [30]. At present, a little is known about the matrix polysaccharide (hemicellulose, pectin, and so on) in cyanobacteria. Surprisingly, several matrix polysaccharide biogenesis genes or their homologues were discovered in this study. The phylogenetic tree (see Figure 3) shows that the genes of fasciclin-like (FAS1) family are duplicated in evolution among different cyanobacteria, suggesting that the FAS1 family occurred after the branch point where cyanobacteria separated from other archaic species but before the divergence of different cyanobacteria. The family is very rare in oceanic unicellular cyanobacteria, but in filamentous Anabaena, Nostoc, and Trichodesmium, it cannot be neglected. Large difference in content of the family between unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria implied the family's contribution to filament formation, which provides us a clue to understanding the evolution of cyanobacteria.

4.4. Species selection and gene classification

Contrast to Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101, and Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, the selection of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is more or less special. Although Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is usually unicellular in entire lifetime, it can hardly be recognized as a “pure” unicellular cyanobacterium. Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 can frequently congregate in dimer or in a loose group. The group members must communicate with each other in special mechanism with similar actions to multicellular filaments. Strong light or other external factors can stimulate numerous single cells to arrange in filamentous shape, showing semi-filamentous feature. That was why Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 was chosen for this study as it has clear transitional character. Selection of and comparison among the 4 cyanobacteria with own particular shape and status should be more persuasive on the issue of this paper. In addition to major components of typical gram-negative bacteria, the existence of EPS (mainly refers to cellulose and hemicellulose) in cyanobacteria is significant. Therefore, peptidoglycan, LPS, EPS, and outer membrane proteins become 4 major components of cyanobacterial envelopes. Over 93% of biogenesis genes of each cyanobacterial envelope were placed in correct place, leaving only <7% of other unknown genes, showing that the classification is scientifically acceptable and also practical. However, problem still remains as it is difficult to eliminate error or misplacement until all cyanobacterial genes are correctly annotated. For instance, some LBR coding proteins were localized in the outer membrane; so these LBR genes can also be considered as OMP genes. Therefore, the genes of the OMP defined in this paper represented mostly those genes whose expressing products are located in outer membrane and carry out functions other than the biosynthesis by peptidoglycan, LPS, and EPS. Moreover, previous reports believed that cyanobacterial cell wall did not contain teichoic acid [3], but the gene alr4011 in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 put the issue in argument. The amino acid sequence of alr4011 has a conserved domain DltE that is a short-chain dehydrogenase involved in the teichoic acid synthesis [31]; and alr4011 showed great similarity to the gene dltE in gram-positive Bacillus subtilis (146 bits [Expect = 7e-34]). No DltE-containing gene was found in Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, or Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101. A possible explanation is that alr4011 was transferred horizontally from gram-positive bacteria, or that the gene was regulated via a special pathway to produce another envelope constituent but teichoic acid. Whether teichoic acid exists in cyanobacterial envelopes is currently an open question that needs further research and experiment.
  28 in total

Review 1.  Building a multicellular organism.

Authors:  D Kaiser
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Mutation of the lipopolysaccharide core glycosyltransferase encoded by waaG destabilizes the outer membrane of Escherichia coli by interfering with core phosphorylation.

Authors:  J A Yethon; E Vinogradov; M B Perry; C Whitfield
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Genome-wide analysis of restriction-modification system in unicellular and filamentous cyanobacteria.

Authors:  Fangqing Zhao; Xiaowen Zhang; Chengwei Liang; Jinyu Wu; Qiyu Bao; Song Qin
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Biosynthesis of cellulose-enriched tension wood in Populus: global analysis of transcripts and metabolites identifies biochemical and developmental regulators in secondary wall biosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara Andersson-Gunnerås; Ewa J Mellerowicz; Jonathan Love; Bo Segerman; Yasunori Ohmiya; Pedro M Coutinho; Peter Nilsson; Bernard Henrissat; Thomas Moritz; Björn Sundberg
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 5.  Biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide O antigens.

Authors:  C Whitfield
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Cellulose in cyanobacteria. Origin of vascular plant cellulose synthase?

Authors:  D R Nobles; D K Romanovicz; R M Brown
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Isolation of the carotenoid-containing cell wall of three unicellular cyanobacteria.

Authors:  C M Resch; J Gibson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; Frank Korzeniewski; Krishna Palaniappan; Ernest Szeto; Greg Werner; Anu Padki; Xueling Zhao; Inna Dubchak; Philip Hugenholtz; Iain Anderson; Athanasios Lykidis; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  InterProScan: protein domains identifier.

Authors:  E Quevillon; V Silventoinen; S Pillai; N Harte; N Mulder; R Apweiler; R Lopez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mutations in Novel Lipopolysaccharide Biogenesis Genes Confer Resistance to Amoebal Grazing in Synechococcus elongatus.

Authors:  Ryan Simkovsky; Emily E Effner; Maria José Iglesias-Sánchez; Susan S Golden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A quantitative analysis of the direct and indirect costs of nitrogen fixation: a model based on Azotobacter vinelandii.

Authors:  Keisuke Inomura; Jason Bragg; Michael J Follows
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 10.302

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.