Literature DB >> 18251620

Maxillary protraction appliance effect on the size of the upper airway passage.

Hüsamettin Oktay1, Esengül Ulukaya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that maxillary protraction appliances (MPA) have no effect on the size of the upper airway passage and craniofacial structures in adolescent patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (5 male and 15 female; mean age 11.5 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusion were included in this study. The records of all patients who had maxillary protraction treatment and had lateral head radiographs taken before and after their protraction treatments were obtained from the files of treated cases. Treatment changes were determined by means of linear, angular, and area measurements. Data were analyzed statistically by means of paired t-test and correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Significant increases were observed in the width and area of the pharyngeal airway. Significant increases also occurred in the sagittal growth of the maxilla, while a clockwise rotation and inhibition of sagittal growth were observed in the mandible.
CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis was rejected. The size of the upper airway can be increased by means of MPA application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18251620     DOI: 10.2319/122806-535.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  17 in total

Review 1.  The effect of teeth extraction for orthodontic treatment on the upper airway: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhiai Hu; Xing Yin; Jing Liao; Chenchen Zhou; Zhenjin Yang; Shujuan Zou
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Arnim Godt; Bernd Koos; Hanno Hagen; Gernot Göz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of maxillary expansion and protraction on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in head posture and hyoid position : A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gökhan Çoban; Taner Öztürk; Merve Ece Erdem; Hatice Cansu Kış; Ahmet Yağcı
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Does the Alternate Rapid Maxillary ExpansionConstriction/Reverse Headgear Therapy Enhance Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions?

Authors:  Nivethitha Bhaskar; Shobha Sundareswaran; Latheef Vadakkeypeediakkal; Praveen Santhakumar; Sreehari Sathyanathan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

5.  Effects of chincup or facemask therapies on the orofacial airway and hyoid position in Class III subjects.

Authors:  Mehmet Akin; Faruk Izzet Ucar; Chousein Chousein; Zafer Sari
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Orofacial airway dimensions in subjects with Class I malocclusion and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Faruk Izzet Ucar; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Correlation between skeletal changes by maxillary protraction and upper airway dimensions.

Authors:  Ji-Won Lee; Ki-Ho Park; Seong-Hun Kim; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Rapid maxillary expansion effects on dynamic measurement of natural head position.

Authors:  Ahmet Yagci; Tancan Uysal; Serdar Usumez; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Three-dimensional alterations in pharyngeal airway and maxillary sinus volumes in Class III maxillary deficiency subjects undergoing orthopedic facemask treatment.

Authors:  Paschalis Pamporakis; Şirin Nevzatoğlu; Nazan Küçükkeleş
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Upper Airway Morphological Changes in Growing Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Treated by Protraction Headgear and Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Comparative Research.

Authors:  Xueling Chen; Dongxu Liu; Ju Liu; Zizhong Wu; Yongtao Xie; Liang Li; Hong Liu; Tiantian Guo; Chen Chen; Shijie Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.