Literature DB >> 18251578

Accuracy of send-out test ordering: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of ordering accuracy in 97 clinical laboratories.

Paul N Valenstein1, Molly K Walsh, Ana K Stankovic.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Errors entering orders for send-out laboratory tests into computer systems waste health care resources and can delay patient evaluation and management.
OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the accuracy of send-out test order entry under "real world" conditions and (2) whether any of several practices are associated with improved order accuracy.
DESIGN: Representatives from 97 clinical laboratories provided information about the processes they use to send tests to reference facilities and their order entry and specimen routing error rates.
RESULTS: In aggregate, 98% of send-out tests were correctly ordered and 99.4% of send-out tests were routed to the proper reference laboratory. There was wide variation among laboratories in the rate of send-out test order entry errors. In the bottom fourth of laboratories, more than 5% of send-out tests were ordered incorrectly, while in the top fourth of laboratories fewer than 0.3% of tests were ordered incorrectly. Order entry errors were less frequent when a miscellaneous test code was used than when a specific test code was used (3.9% vs 5.6%; P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: Computer order entry errors for send-out tests occur approximately twice as frequently as order entry errors for other types of tests. Filing more specific test codes in a referring institution's information system is unlikely to reduce order entry errors and may make error rates worse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18251578     DOI: 10.5858/2008-132-206-AOSTOA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  5 in total

1.  Rapid clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric ICU: Genetic counselor impacts and challenges.

Authors:  Sarah V Clowes Candadai; Megan C Sikes; Jenny M Thies; Amanda S Freed; James T Bennett
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Decoding laboratory test names: a major challenge to appropriate patient care.

Authors:  Elissa Passiment; James L Meisel; John Fontanesi; George Fritsma; Samir Aleryani; Marisa Marques
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Impact of Rapid Exome Sequencing on Medical Management of Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Amanda S Freed; Sarah V Clowes Candadai; Megan C Sikes; Jenny Thies; Heather M Byers; Jennifer N Dines; Mesaki Kenneth Ndugga-Kabuye; Mallory B Smith; Katie Fogus; Heather C Mefford; Christina Lam; Margaret P Adam; Angela Sun; John K McGuire; Robert DiGeronimo; Katrina M Dipple; Gail H Deutsch; Zeenia C Billimoria; James T Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Paul L Epner; Janet E Gans; Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Reqscan: An open source solution for laboratory requisition scanning, archiving and retrieval.

Authors:  Eviatar Bach; Daniel T Holmes
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.