Literature DB >> 18251388

Serotype-specific and serotype-independent strategies for preharvest control of food-borne Salmonella in poultry.

Richard K Gast1.   

Abstract

Of more than 2500 identified Salmonella serotypes, only a small proportion are common in poultry flocks. However, there is an epidemiologically important connection between poultry products and human infections because many of the serotypes that are most prevalent in humans (such as Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Enteritidis) are similarly common in poultry. The scope of food safety efforts for poultry products has been broadened in recent years to include more attention to animal production (or preharvest) issues. The goal of preharvest poultry food safety is to minimize opportunities for the introduction, persistence, and transmission of flock infections with Salmonella and other human pathogens. This objective can be pursued either by general strategies directed against all Salmonella serotypes (and in some instances against other pathogenic microorganisms as well) or by more specific strategies that are designed to act with precision against particular Salmonella serotypes with distinctive public health or economic significance. Risk assessment studies have recommended intervention at multiple steps in the farm-to-table continuum as the most productive overall approach. A comprehensive quality assurance strategy, encompassing both broadly based risk-reduction practices and targeted testing to detect pathogens of concern, has been associated with a lower incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis infections in both egg-laying flocks and humans in a number of countries. Although the emphasis in these types of programs is primarily on risk reduction, testing provides essential verification of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of risk-reduction practices (and identifies flocks infected with uniquely problematic serotypes). Vaccination can enhance the short-term responsiveness of control programs to address problems involving specific serotypes of elevated significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18251388     DOI: 10.1637/8090-081807.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  21 in total

Review 1.  Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production.

Authors:  Steven L Foley; Rajesh Nayak; Irene B Hanning; Timothy J Johnson; Jing Han; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses from commercial broiler chicken flocks.

Authors:  Roy D Berghaus; Stephan G Thayer; Bibiana F Law; Rita M Mild; Charles L Hofacre; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Richard K Arsenault; Brent P Avery; Anne E Deckert; Sheryl P Gow; Nicol Janecko; David F Léger; E Jane Parmley; Richard J Reid-Smith; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Temporal changes in the expression of avian β-defensins in the chicken vagina during sexual maturation and Salmonella infection.

Authors:  Maria Anastasiadou; Melpomeni Avdi; Alexandros Theodoridis; Georgios Michailidis
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis pathogenicity island 1 is not essential for but facilitates rapid systemic spread in chickens.

Authors:  Taseen S Desin; Po-King S Lam; Birgit Koch; Claudia Mickael; Emil Berberov; Amanda L S Wisner; Hugh G G Townsend; Andrew A Potter; Wolfgang Köster
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Prevalence and characterization of motile Salmonella in commercial layer poultry farms in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Himel Barua; Paritosh K Biswas; Katharina E P Olsen; Jens P Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The O28 Antigen Gene Clusters of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Dakar and Serovar Pomona Are Different.

Authors:  Clifford G Clark; Christopher C R Grant; Keri M Trout-Yakel; Helen Tabor; Lai-King Ng; Kris Rahn; Kristyn Franklin; Andrew M Kropinski
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-28

Review 8.  Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?

Authors:  Guyue Cheng; Haihong Hao; Shuyu Xie; Xu Wang; Menghong Dai; Lingli Huang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Salmonella Characterization in Poultry Eggs Sold in Farms and Markets in Relation to Handling and Biosecurity Practices in Ogun State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Michael Agbaje; Patience Ayo-Ajayi; Olugbenga Kehinde; Ezekiel Omoshaba; Morenike Dipeolu; Folorunso O Fasina
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24

10.  Reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis in the spleens of hens by bacterins that vary in fimbrial protein SefD.

Authors:  Roxana Sanchez-Ingunza; Jean Guard; Cesar A Morales; Alan H Icard
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.