OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). METHODS: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. RESULTS:Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (theta for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. CONCLUSIONS: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). METHODS: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. RESULTS: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (theta for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. CONCLUSIONS: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.
Authors: Walker S C Poston; Christopher K Haddock; Katie M Heinrich; Sara A Jahnke; Nattinee Jitnarin; David B Batchelor Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Tracy Sbrocco; Kelly R Theim; L Adelyn Cohen; Eleanor R Mackey; Eric Stice; Jennifer L Henderson; Sarah J McCreight; Edny J Bryant; Mark B Stephens Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: N Jitnarin; V Kosulwat; N Rojroongwasinkul; A Boonpraderm; C K Haddock; W S C Poston Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Jonathan Peake; Susan Gargett; Michael Waller; Ruth McLaughlin; Tegan Cosgrove; Gary Wittert; Peter Nasveld; Peter Warfe Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: A M Adeoye; O Adebayo; M Nwosu; A Adebiyi; M O Owolabi; B O Tayo; B L Salako; A Ogunniyi; R S Cooper Journal: Ann Ib Postgrad Med Date: 2017-12