Literature DB >> 18251329

Prediction of simulated battlefield physical performance from field-expedient tests.

Everett A Harman1, David J Gutekunst, Peter N Frykman, Marilyn A Sharp, Bradley C Nindl, Joseph A Alemany, Robert P Mello.   

Abstract

Predictive models of battlefield physical performance can benefit the military. To develop models, 32 physically trained men (mean +/- SD: 28.0 +/- 4.7 years, 82.1 +/- 11.3 kg, 176.3 +/- 7.5 cm) underwent (1) anthropometric measures: height and body mass; (2) fitness tests: push-ups, sit-ups, 3.2-km run, vertical jump, horizontal jump; (3) simulated battlefield physical performance in fighting load: five 30-m sprints prone to prone, 400-m run, obstacle course, and casualty recovery. Although greater body mass was positively associated with better casualty recovery performance, it showed trends toward poorer performance on all the other fitness and military performance tests. Regression equations well predicted the simulated battlefield performance from the anthropometric measures and physical fitness tests (r = 0.77-0.82). The vertical jump entered all four prediction equations and the horizontal jump entered one of them. The equations, using input from easy to administer tests, effectively predict simulated battlefield physical performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18251329     DOI: 10.7205/milmed.173.1.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  10 in total

1.  MODIFIED FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREENING AS A PREDICTOR OF TACTICAL PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL IN RECREATIONALLY ACTIVE ADULTS.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-10

2.  Physiological consequences of military high-speed boat transits.

Authors:  Stephen D Myers; Trevor D Dobbins; Stuart King; Benjamin Hall; Ruth M Ayling; Sharon R Holmes; Tom Gunston; Rosemary Dyson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  LOAD-ENHANCED MOVEMENT QUALITY SCREENING AND TACTICAL ATHLETICISM: AN EXTENSION OF EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Threshold of Energy Deficit and Lower-Body Performance Declines in Military Personnel: A Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Nancy E Murphy; Christopher T Carrigan; J Philip Karl; Stefan M Pasiakos; Lee M Margolis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Inalambric Biofeedback Devices to Analyze Strength Manifestation in Military Population.

Authors:  Rosa Delgado-Moreno; José Juan Robles-Pérez; Susana Aznar; Vicente Javier Clemente-Suarez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Content Validity Index and Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of a New Muscle Strength/Endurance Test Battery for Swedish Soldiers.

Authors:  Helena Larsson; Matthias Tegern; Andreas Monnier; Jörgen Skoglund; Charlotte Helander; Emelie Persson; Christer Malm; Lisbet Broman; Ulrika Aasa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Leg Power As an Indicator of Risk of Injury or Illness in Police Recruits.

Authors:  Robin Orr; Rodney Pope; Samantha Peterson; Benjamin Hinton; Michael Stierli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Associations between Fitness Measures and Change of Direction Speeds with and without Occupational Loads in Female Police Officers.

Authors:  Robin M Orr; Filip Kukić; Aleksandar Čvorović; Nenad Koropanovski; Radivoje Janković; Jay Dawes; Robert Lockie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Physical fitness, hormonal, and immunological responses during prolonged military field training.

Authors:  Tommi Ojanen; Petri Jalanko; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-09

10.  Effects of Task-Specific and Strength Training on Simulated Military Task Performance in Soldiers.

Authors:  Tommi Ojanen; Keijo Häkkinen; Jaakko Hanhikoski; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.