Literature DB >> 18250119

A comparison between cobalt and linear accelerator-based treatment plans for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

E J Adams1, A P Warrington.   

Abstract

The simplicity of cobalt units gives them the advantage of reduced maintenance, running costs and downtime when compared with linear accelerators. However, treatments carried out on such units are typically limited to simple techniques. This study has explored the use of cobalt beams for conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Six patients, covering a range of treatment sites, were planned using both X-ray photons (6/10 MV) and cobalt-60 gamma rays (1.17 and 1.33 MeV). A range of conformal and IMRT techniques were considered, as appropriate. Conformal plans created using cobalt beams for small breast, meningioma and parotid cases were found to compare well with those created using X-ray photons. By using additional fields, acceptable conformal plans were also created for oesophagus and prostate cases. IMRT plans were found to be of comparable quality for meningioma, parotid and thyroid cases on the basis of dose-volume histogram analysis. We conclude that it is possible to plan high-quality radical radiotherapy treatments for cobalt units. A well-designed beam blocking/compensation system would be required to enable a practical and efficient alternative to multileaf collimator (MLC)-based linac treatments to be offered. If cobalt units were to have such features incorporated into them, they could offer considerable benefits to the radiotherapy community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18250119     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/77023750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of the setup dependence of detector response functions for mega-voltage linear accelerators.

Authors:  Christopher Fox; Tom Simon; Bill Simon; James F Dempsey; Darren Kahler; Jatinder R Palta; Chihray Liu; Guanghua Yan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monte Carlo simulation of a multi-leaf collimator design for telecobalt machine using BEAMnrc code.

Authors:  Komanduri M Ayyangar; M Dinesh Kumar; Pradush Narayan; Fenedit Jesuraj; M R Raju
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-01

3.  International Conference on Advances in Radiation Oncology (ICARO): outcomes of an IAEA meeting.

Authors:  Eeva K Salminen; Krystyna Kiel; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Michael C Joiner; Eduardo Rosenblatt; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Jan Wondergem; Ahmed Meghzifene
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Monte Carlo Investigation of Photon Beam Characteristics and its Variation with Incident Electron Beam Parameters for Indigenous Medical Linear Accelerator.

Authors:  Subhalaxmi Mishra; P K Dixit; T Palani Selvam; Sanket S Yavalkar; D D Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

5.  Model for Estimating Power and Downtime Effects on Teletherapy Units in Low-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Rachel McCarroll; Bassem Youssef; Beth Beadle; Maureen Bojador; Rex Cardan; Robin Famiglietti; David Followill; Geoffrey Ibbott; Anuja Jhingran; Christoph Trauernicht; Peter Balter; Laurence Court
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-01-11

6.  Breast telecobalt beam therapy using multi-isocentric technique.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Ananthi; Rajasekaran Dhanabalan; Iyer Priya; Ganesarajah Selvaluxmy; Nagarajan Vivekanandan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-12

7.  Forward-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy using a cobalt source: A dosimetric study in breast cancer.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Joseph Kigula-Mugambe; Cinzia Digesù; Gabriella Macchia; Solomon Bogale; Mariangela Massaccesi; David Dawotola; Francesco Deodato; Milly Buwenge; Luciana Caravatta; Angelo Piermattei; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.