Literature DB >> 18249591

Post-genomics studies and their application to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Neil D Avent1, Zoe E Plummer, Tracey E Madgett, Deborah G Maddocks, Peter W Soothill.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) offers the opportunity to eliminate completely the risky procedures of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. The development of NIPD tests has largely centred around the isolation and analysis of fetal cells in the maternal circulation and the analysis of free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Both of these techniques offer difficult technical challenges, and at the current moment in time the use of free fetal DNA is the simplest and most effective method of defining paternally inherited fetal genes for diagnosis. Post-genomics technologies that explore the proteins (proteomics) and transcripts (transcriptomics) released by the placenta into the maternal circulation offer new opportunities to identify genes and their protein products that are key diagnostic markers of disease (in particular Down syndrome), and might replace the current screening markers in use for prediction of risk of Down syndrome. In the ideal situation, these markers are sufficiently diagnostic not to require invasive sampling of fetal genetic material. Post-genomics techniques might also offer better opportunities for defining fetal cell-specific markers that might enhance their isolation from maternal blood samples. This review describes progress in these studies, particularly those funded by the Special Non-invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation (SAFE) Network of Excellence.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18249591     DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

1.  Light-scattering spectroscopy differentiates fetal from adult nucleated red blood cells: may lead to noninvasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Kee-Hak Lim; Saira Salahuddin; Le Qiu; Hui Fang; Edward Vitkin; Ionita C Ghiran; Mark D Modell; Tamara Takoudes; Irving Itzkan; Eugene B Hanlon; Benjamin P Sachs; Lev T Perelman
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies: new technologies and clinical applications.

Authors:  Elisavet A Papageorgiou; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  Non invasive prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy: next generation sequencing or fetal DNA enrichment?

Authors:  A Webb; Te Madgett; T Miran; K Sillence; N Kaushik; M Kiernan; Nd Avent
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.519

4.  Prenatal Diagnosis of β-Thalassemias and Hemoglobinopathies.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Rosatelli; Luisella Saba
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  MeDIP combined with in-solution targeted enrichment followed by NGS: Inter-individual methylation variability of fetal-specific biomarkers and their implementation in a proof of concept study for NIPT.

Authors:  Anna Keravnou; Marios Ioannides; Charalambos Loizides; Kyriakos Tsangaras; Achilleas Achilleos; Petros Mina; Elena Kypri; Michael D Hadjidaniel; Maria Neofytou; Skevi Kyriacou; Carolina Sismani; George Koumbaris; Philippos C Patsalis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biomarker development for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: predictive reliability and potential clinical application.

Authors:  Aggeliki Kolialexi; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos; Georgia Tounta; Aris Antsaklis; Ariadni Mavrou; George Th Tsangaris
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.543

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.