Literature DB >> 18249207

Diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome: a comparative analysis in an unselected sample of adult male population.

Pasquale Strazzullo1, Antonio Barbato, Alfonso Siani, Francesco P Cappuccio, Marco Versiero, Pierluigi Schiattarella, Ornella Russo, Sonia Avallone, Elisabetta della Valle, Eduardo Farinaro.   

Abstract

This analysis compares the performance of 7 different diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome (MS) with regard to the prevalence of the syndrome, the characteristics of subjects with a positive diagnosis, and the ability to correctly identify individuals at high calculated cardiovascular (CV) risk or with signs of systemic inflammation or early organ damage. The diagnostic criteria proposed by the World Health Organization (1998); European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR) (1999); Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) (2001); American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) (2003); ATP III (2004); International Diabetes Federation (IDF) (2005); and American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2005) were applied to the population of 933 men aged 59.5 years (range, 33-81 years) attending the 2002-2004 examination of the Olivetti Heart Study. Standardized measurements were available for body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting serum total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, glucose, insulin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and microalbuminuria. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment index; and CV risk, by the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster algorithm. The MS prevalence ranged from 8.6% (AACE) to 44.5% (IDF). Among MS-positive subjects, insulin resistance ranged from 94.8% (EGIR) to 49.2% (IDF), whereas type 2 diabetes mellitus (excluded by EGIR and AACE criteria) rated 59.9% by World Health Organization and 22% to 24% by ATP III, IDF, or American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. By most criteria, MS-positive subjects had greater calculated CV risk than MS-negative subjects; but in general, the ability to correctly identify individuals at high CV risk was dampened by limited sensitivity (maximum 60%). Lowering the cutoff for abdominal adiposity (waist circumference <94 cm by IDF) did not improve the performance in this regard but identified a larger number of individuals with microalbuminuria (56%) and elevated C-reactive protein (53%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18249207     DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  16 in total

Review 1.  Visceral obesity and metabolic syndrome: two faces of the same medal?

Authors:  Rosario Scaglione; Tiziana Di Chiara; Tiziana Cariello; Giuseppe Licata
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  A retrospective review of the metabolic syndrome in women diagnosed with breast cancer and correlation with estrogen receptor.

Authors:  Sarah V Colonna; L Douglas Case; Julia A Lawrence
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Comparison of different metabolic syndrome definitions and risks of incident cardiovascular events in the elderly.

Authors:  Celeste M Vinluan; Hala H Zreikat; James R Levy; Kai I Cheang
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 8.694

4.  Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Physical Fitness Among Subjects with Asymptomatic Colonic Diverticulosis.

Authors:  Offir Ukashi; Barak Pflantzer; Yiftach Barash; Eyal Klang; Shlomo Segev; David J Ozeri; Ido Veisman; Adi Lahat; Ido Laish; Uri Kopylov; Amit Oppenheim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and Frailty: Is There any Room for Good Outcome in the Elderly Undergoing Emergency Surgery?

Authors:  Pietro Fransvea; Gianluca Costa; Luca Lepre; Gabriella Teresa Capolupo; Filippo Carannante; Caterina Puccioni; Alessandro Costa; Antonio La Greca; Francesco Giovinazzo; Gabriele Sganga
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  Liver histology according to the presence of metabolic syndrome in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease cases.

Authors:  Hüseyin Saadettin Uslusoy; Selim-Giray Nak; Macit Gülten; Zeynep Biyikli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Improvement of metabolic syndrome following intragastric balloon: 1 year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Crea; Giacomo Pata; Domenico Della Casa; Luigi Minelli; Giovanni Maifredi; Ernesto Di Betta; Francesco Mittempergher
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  The 24-month metabolic benefits of the healthy living partnerships to prevent diabetes: A community-based translational study.

Authors:  Carolyn F Pedley; L Douglas Case; Caroline S Blackwell; Jeffrey A Katula; Mara Z Vitolins
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2017-09-23

9.  Dietary fibre improves first-phase insulin secretion in overweight individuals.

Authors:  Caroline L Bodinham; Leanne Smith; John Wright; Gary S Frost; M Denise Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mitochondrial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome and asthma.

Authors:  Ulaganathan Mabalirajan; Balaram Ghosh
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2013-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.