Literature DB >> 18249042

Determination of required content of the informed consent process for human participants in biomedical research conducted in the U.S. A practical tool to assist clinical investigators.

Cheryl M Chanaud1.   

Abstract

Clinical Investigators conducting biomedical research involving human participants in the U.S. are responsible for the content of the consent document(s) and for the conduct of the informed consent conference(s) with the human participants. The content of the consent forms and consent process may be governed by two different sets of U.S. regulations and may be impacted upon by separate, generally accepted, international guidelines. It can be difficult and confusing for an Investigator to determine which set(s) of regulations or guidelines apply to which studies. This article compares the two sets of U.S. regulations and two sets of well-respected international guidelines with respect to their requirements for the content of the consent document and consent conference. A practical decision tree is proposed as a tool to assist Investigators in determining which set(s) of requirements is applicable to a particular study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18249042     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Informed Consent Process of a Multicenter Tuberculosis Treatment Trial.

Authors:  Kimberley N Chapman; Eric Pevzner; Joan M Mangan; Peter Breese; Dorcas Lamunu; Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara; Joseph G Nakibali; Stefan V Goldberg
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-02-19

2.  Is informed consent related to success in exercise and diet intervention as evaluated at 12 months? DR's EXTRA study.

Authors:  Helena Länsimies-Antikainen; Anna-Maija Pietilä; Tomi Laitinen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Rainer Rauramaa
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.