Literature DB >> 18248768

Increased frequency of micronucleated exfoliated cells among humans exposed in vivo to mobile telephone radiations.

Abhay Singh Yadav1, Manoj Kumar Sharma.   

Abstract

The health concerns have been raised following the enormous increase in the use of wireless mobile telephones throughout the world. This investigation had been taken, with the motive to find out whether mobile phone radiations cause any in vivo effects on the frequency of micronucleated exfoliated cells in the exposed subjects. A total of 109 subjects including 85 regular mobile phone users (exposed) and 24 non-users (controls) had participated in this study. Exfoliated cells were obtained by swabbing the buccal-mucosa from exposed as well as sex-age-matched controls. One thousand exfoliated cells were screened from each individual for nuclear anomalies including micronuclei (MN), karyolysis (KL), karyorrhexis (KH), broken egg (BE) and binucleated (BN) cells. The average daily duration of exposure to mobile phone radiations is 61.26 min with an overall average duration of exposure in term of years is 2.35 years in exposed subjects along with the 9.84+/-0.745 micronucleated cells (MNCs) and 10.72+/-0.889 total micronuclei (TMN) as compared to zero duration of exposure along with average 3.75+/-0.774 MNC and 4.00+/-0.808 TMN in controls. The means are significantly different in case of MNC and TMN at 0.01% level of significance. The mean of KL in controls is 13.17+/-2.750 and in exposed subjects is 13.06+/-1.793. The value of means of KH in exposed subjects (1.84+/-0.432) is slightly higher than in controls (1.42+/-0.737). Mean frequency of broken egg is found to be more in exposed subjects (0.65+/-0.276) as compared to controls (0.50+/-0.217). Frequency of presence of more than one nucleus in a cell (binucleated) is also higher in exposed (2.72+/-0.374) in comparison to controls (0.67+/-0.231). Although there is a slight increase in mean frequency of KH, BE and BN in exposed subjects but the difference is not found statistically significant. Correlation between 0-1, 1-2, 2-3 and 3-4 years of exposure and the frequency of MNC and TMN has been calculated and found to be positively correlated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18248768     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of the Genotoxic Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation using Buccal Micronucleus Assay: A Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Sumita Banerjee; Narendra Nath Singh; Gadiputi Sreedhar; Saikat Mukherjee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

2.  Terahertz electromagnetic fields (0.106 THz) do not induce manifest genomic damage in vitro.

Authors:  Henning Hintzsche; Christian Jastrow; Thomas Kleine-Ostmann; Uwe Kärst; Thorsten Schrader; Helga Stopper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Detection of Low Level Microwave Radiation Induced Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage Vis-à-vis Genotoxicity in Brain of Fischer Rats.

Authors:  Pravin Suryakantrao Deshmukh; Kanu Megha; Basu Dev Banerjee; Rafat Sultana Ahmed; Sudhir Chandna; Mahesh Pandurang Abegaonkar; Ashok Kumar Tripathi
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2013-01

4.  Significance of micronuclei in buccal smears of mobile phone users: A comparative study.

Authors:  M Vanishree; Vardendra Manvikar; Amrutha Rudraraju; K M Parveen Reddy; N H Praveen Kumar; Syed Jaffar M Quadri
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2018 Sep-Dec

Review 5.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

6.  Micronucleus Assay in Cell Phone Users: Importance of Oral Mucosa Screening.

Authors:  Melika Ghandehari; Donia Sadri; Sareh Farhadi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 7.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.