Literature DB >> 1824863

The role of dose intensity in determining outcome in intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

R M Meyer1, W M Hryniuk, M D Goodyear.   

Abstract

To determine whether the dose intensity of chemotherapeutic regimens correlates with the complete remission rate in adult patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma, reports of comparative trials of therapy were reviewed. Reports were identified using MEDLINE, through references from review articles, and through review of selected abstracts. Twenty-two studies including 14 randomized and eight cohort trials were analyzed to assess projected dose intensity. Four other studies were analyzed to assess the role of received dose intensity. Dose intensities were calculated using described methods and correlated with complete remission rates. Individual trials were assessed using "levels of evidence." A metaanalysis of randomized trials and a cross-trial analysis of all comparative trials using a weighted least squares linear regression were performed. Using levels of evidence, support was obtained for the hypothesis that dose intensity correlates with the remission rate from two trials in which dose intensity was "indirectly" tested. As these studies did not "directly" test dose intensity, confounding variables, including those arising from the assumptions made in calculating dose intensity, cannot be excluded. Metaanalysis showed a relative probability of achieving complete remission of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.58) favoring the pooled arm of high dose intensity. Cross-trial analysis showed a relatively weak association between dose intensity and remission rate (r = .49, P = .0001). Two of four reports retrospectively assessing received dose intensity suggested that increased dose intensity is associated with superior remission rates. These analyses suggest that dose intensity may correlate with the remission rate in advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma. However, properly designed trials directly testing dose intensity have not been performed and are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1824863     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.2.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

1.  Intensive chemotherapy in the treatment of aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Agustin Avilés; M Jesús Nambo; Natividad Neri; Alejandra Talavera; Claudia Castañeda; Edgar Murillo; Sergio Cleto; Judith Huerta-Guzmán
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  A randomized controlled trial investigating the survival benefit of dose-intensified multidrug combination chemotherapy (LSG9) for intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9002.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kinoshita; Tomomitsu Hotta; Kensei Tobinai; Tohru Kobayashi; Naoki Ishizuka; Masao Tomonaga; Toshiaki Sai; Youichiro Ohno; Masaharu Kasai; Michinori Ogura; Chikara Mikuni; Hironobu Toki; Masayuki Sano; Yasufumi Masaki; Tomoko Ohtsu; Yoshihiro Matsuno; Takeaki Takenaka; Shigeru Shirakawa; Masanori Shimoyama
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Long-term results of a multicenter randomized, comparative trial of modified CHOP versus THP-COP versus THP-COPE regimens in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Mayumi Mori; Kiyoshi Kitamura; Michihiko Masuda; Tomomitsu Hotta; Tamotsu Miyazaki; Akira B Miura; Hideaki Mizoguchi; Akira Shibata; Hidehiko Saito; Tamotsu Matsuda; Toru Masaoka; Mine Harada; Yoshiyuki Niho; Fumimaro Takaku
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  Failing to live up to the fanfare? A personal perspective on obstacles to the clinical development of thrombopoietic agents.

Authors:  R L Basser; C G Begley
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the elderly: a guide to drug treatment.

Authors:  N Niitsu
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Cost-benefit analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during CHOP antineoplastic therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  G Dranitsaris; C Altmayer; I Quirt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Implications of the European Organisation for Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for lymphoma care.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; Matti Aapro; Ercole Brusamolino; Dolores Caballero; Bertrand Coiffier; Michael Pfreundschuh; Marek Trneny; Jan Walewski
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Is Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-R Less Effective in Children Than Adults With Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma?

Authors:  Rahul Lakhotia; Christopher Melani; Mark Roschewski; Wyndham H Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 50.717

9.  High-dose intensity cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone by shortened intervals and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II study.

Authors:  P Pronzato; R Lionetto; F Botto; F Pensa; A Tognoni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Dose intensity analysis in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  V Torri; E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.