OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to compare by light microscopy the effects of laser photobiomodulation (LPBM) at lambda = 660 nm and lambda = 780 nm on third-degree burns in diabetic Wistar rats. BACKGROUND DATA: Burns are severe injuries that result in fluid loss, tissue destruction, infection, and shock, that may result in death. Diabetes is a disease that reduces the body's ability to heal properly. LPBM has been suggested as an effective method of improving wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A third-degree burn measuring 1.5 x 1.5 cm was created in the dorsum of each of 55 animals, and they were divided into three groups that were or were not treated with LPBM (lambda = 660 nm or lambda = 780 nm, 35 mW, varphi = 2 mm, 20 J/cm(2)). The treatments were started immediately post-burn at four points within the burned area (5 J/cm(2)) and were repeated at 24-hour intervals over 21 d. The animals were humanely killed after 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 d by an overdose of intraperitoneal general anesthetic. The specimens were routinely cut and stained and analyzed by light microscopy. RESULTS: We found that healing in the animals receiving 660-nm laser energy was more apparent at early stages, with positive effects on inflammation, the amount and quality of granulation tissue, fibroblast proliferation, and on collagen deposition and organization. Epithelialization and local microcirculation were also positively affected by the treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of 780-nm laser energy was not as effective as 660-nm energy, but it had positive effects at early stages on the onset and development of inflammation. At the end of the experimental period the primary effect seen was on the amount and quality of the granulation tissue. The 660-nm laser at 20 J/cm(2), when used on a daily basis, was more effective than the 780-nm laser for improving the healing of third-degree burns in the diabetic rats beginning at the early stages post-burn.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to compare by light microscopy the effects of laser photobiomodulation (LPBM) at lambda = 660 nm and lambda = 780 nm on third-degree burns in diabeticWistar rats. BACKGROUND DATA: Burns are severe injuries that result in fluid loss, tissue destruction, infection, and shock, that may result in death. Diabetes is a disease that reduces the body's ability to heal properly. LPBM has been suggested as an effective method of improving wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A third-degree burn measuring 1.5 x 1.5 cm was created in the dorsum of each of 55 animals, and they were divided into three groups that were or were not treated with LPBM (lambda = 660 nm or lambda = 780 nm, 35 mW, varphi = 2 mm, 20 J/cm(2)). The treatments were started immediately post-burn at four points within the burned area (5 J/cm(2)) and were repeated at 24-hour intervals over 21 d. The animals were humanely killed after 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 d by an overdose of intraperitoneal general anesthetic. The specimens were routinely cut and stained and analyzed by light microscopy. RESULTS: We found that healing in the animals receiving 660-nm laser energy was more apparent at early stages, with positive effects on inflammation, the amount and quality of granulation tissue, fibroblast proliferation, and on collagen deposition and organization. Epithelialization and local microcirculation were also positively affected by the treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of 780-nm laser energy was not as effective as 660-nm energy, but it had positive effects at early stages on the onset and development of inflammation. At the end of the experimental period the primary effect seen was on the amount and quality of the granulation tissue. The 660-nm laser at 20 J/cm(2), when used on a daily basis, was more effective than the 780-nm laser for improving the healing of third-degree burns in the diabeticrats beginning at the early stages post-burn.
Authors: Helen Reinhart Camargo Catarino; Natália Pereira de Godoy; Nayara Kastem Scharlack; Lia Mara Grosso Neves; Fernanda Oliveira de Gaspari de Gaspi; Marcelo Augusto Marreto Esquisatto; Maria Esméria Corezola do Amaral; Fernanda Aparecida Sampaio Mendonça; Gláucia Maria Tech dos Santos Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Eduardo Tavares Lima Trajano; Larissa Alexsandra da Trajano; Marco Aurélio Dos Santos Silva; Neil Grant Venter; Luís Cristóvão de Porto; Adenilson de Fonseca; Andréa Monte-Alto-Costa Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: José Carlos Tatmatsu-Rocha; Carla Roberta Tim; Lucimar Avo; Rubens Bernardes-Filho; Patricia Brassolatti; Hueliton Wilian Kido; Michael R Hamblin; Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto Journal: J Photochem Photobiol B Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 6.252
Authors: R K Mathur; Khageswar Sahu; Siddharth Saraf; Pooja Patheja; Fareed Khan; P K Gupta Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Franciane B Fiório; Regiane Albertini; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior; Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Maria Emília de Abreu Chaves; Angélica Rodrigues de Araújo; André Costa Cruz Piancastelli; Marcos Pinotti Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.896