Literature DB >> 18247883

Annoyance and disturbance of daily activities from road traffic noise in Canada.

David S Michaud1, Stephen E Keith, Dale McMurchy.   

Abstract

This study evaluated road traffic noise annoyance in Canada in relation to activity interference, subject concerns about noise and self-reported distance to a major road. Random digit dialing was employed to survey a representative sample of 2565 Canadians 15 years of age and older. Respondents highly annoyed by traffic noise were significantly more likely to perceive annoyance to negatively impact health, live closer to a heavily traveled road and report that traffic noise often interfered with daily activities. Sex, age, education level, community size and province had statistically significant associations with traffic noise annoyance. High noise annoyance consistently correlated with frequent interference of activities. Reducing noise at night (10 pm-7 am) was more important than during the rest of the day.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247883     DOI: 10.1121/1.2821984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Noise levels associated with urban land use.

Authors:  Gavin King; Marek Roland-Mieszkowski; Timothy Jason; Daniel G Rainham
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  2Loud?: Community mapping of exposure to traffic noise with mobile phones.

Authors:  Simone Leao; Kok-Leong Ong; Adam Krezel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Impact of road traffic noise annoyance on health-related quality of life: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Julia Dratva; Elisabeth Zemp; Denise Felber Dietrich; Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux; Thierry Rochat; Christian Schindler; Margaret W Gerbase
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Annoyance and activity disturbance induced by high-speed railway and conventional railway noise: a contrastive case study.

Authors:  Guo-Qing Di; Qi-Li Lin; Zheng-Guang Li; Jian Kang
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Annoyance from Road Traffic, Trains, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels.

Authors:  Martina S Ragettli; Sophie Goudreau; Céline Plante; Stéphane Perron; Michel Fournier; Audrey Smargiassi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  [Noise annoyance in the German general population : Prevalence and determinants in the Gutenberg Health Study].

Authors:  Omar Hahad; Manfred Beutel; Matthias Michal; Andreas Schulz; Norbert Pfeiffer; Emilio Gianicolo; Karl Lackner; Philipp Wild; Andreas Daiber; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.740

7.  Noise attenuation varies by interactions of land cover and season in an urban/peri-urban landscape.

Authors:  Justin M Gaudon; Michael J McTavish; Jonas Hamberg; Heather A Cray; Stephen D Murphy
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.686

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.