Literature DB >> 18246943

EPA's 2006 human-subjects rule for pesticide experiments.

Kristin Shrader-Frechette1.   

Abstract

Arguing that the 2006 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human-subjects rule allows use of unethical third-party research (on pregnant women and children) in setting pesticide regulations, this article first (a) provides a brief history of U.S. pesticide regulation, particularly regarding childhood safety. Next it (b) outlines ethical and scientific loopholes in the 2006 EPA rule; (c) shows how the Human Subjects Review Board, mandated by the 2006 rule, has been implemented in flawed ways; and (d) illustrates that one source of problems with the rule may be influence by those with conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18246943     DOI: 10.1080/08989620701670161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Conflict of Interest and Funding Disclosure Policies of Environmental, Occupational, and Public Health Journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Brandon Konecny; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Dollars and Deadlines: Rule Reforms in Short Time Frames.

Authors:  Toby Schonfeld; Melinda Gormley; Daniel K Nelson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Social Benefits of Human Subjects Research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  J Clin Res Best Pract       Date:  2008-11-01

4.  Taking financial relationships into account when assessing research.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Kevin C Elliott
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.