| Literature DB >> 18246943 |
Abstract
Arguing that the 2006 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) human-subjects rule allows use of unethical third-party research (on pregnant women and children) in setting pesticide regulations, this article first (a) provides a brief history of U.S. pesticide regulation, particularly regarding childhood safety. Next it (b) outlines ethical and scientific loopholes in the 2006 EPA rule; (c) shows how the Human Subjects Review Board, mandated by the 2006 rule, has been implemented in flawed ways; and (d) illustrates that one source of problems with the rule may be influence by those with conflicts of interest.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18246943 DOI: 10.1080/08989620701670161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622